Republika Srpska challenges the federal government with controversial referendum
The recent referendum on the issue of the national day of Republika Srpska brought old tensions to the fore as to its relationship with the rest of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which the republic is a part of. The successful plebiscite showing overwhelming support for the “national interest” of the enclave republic strengthened the hand of its president Milorad Dodik. His meeting with Russia’s President Vladimir Putin also seems to reveal a keen interest taken by Russia in the issue and potential future support from the Kremlin for the Serbian inhabitants of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Published: October 9, 2016, 6:59 pm
On September 25th a referendum was held in Republika Srpska (an entity inside the federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina) for the first time in its history. At issue was the celebration of the Day of Republic – January the 9th. An overwhelming majority voted in favor of the national celebrations. The holiday of Republican Day was earlier held in the Serbian entity annually, but in November of 2015 the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina declared it unconstitutional.
The federal government in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina, voiced it’s dissatisfaction with the plebiscite to be held in Republika Srpska. Also Brussels and Washington took a critical stance. The High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina, Valentin Inzko, condemned the Referendum and threatened the President of RS Dodik with sanctions.
There were also threats of outright violence. The ex-head of Bosnia and Herzegovina‘s military staff, Sefer Halifovic, said that if there was a Referendum, military reaction would follow, and Republika Srpska would be eliminated. Representatives of the ruling party of Bosnia and Herzegovina however hastened to remark that the General’s opinion did not reflect the official position of Sarajevo, but that they “understands the concern of Bosnian patriots”.
The reaction of the Srpska government in Banja Luka to such threats was harsh: President of Republika Srpska Milorad Dodik warned that if force was used against the Republic, it would at once declare independence. “We are not for a single moment going to stay on as a constituent part of the state, in which our counterparts use violence against us”, he emphasized. However, the Referendum was held in a peaceful atmosphere without any incidents.
The attendance of the plebiscite reached 55.7 per cent, which is close to the usual attendance for elections in the country, with 99.81 per cent of participants voting in favor of continued celebration of the day of Republika Srpska on January 9.
On the one hand it became a resounding success for the ruling elite of Republika Srpska, as just about for the first time in the post-Dayton period Banja Luka did not kowtow to Sarajevo and persisted in defending its national interest, although it all started from a very symbolic issue. On the other hand, many members of the ruling party – the Union of the Independent Social-Democrats, SNSD – expected greater enthusiasm on the part of the citizens. On the sidelines of the party meetings they even talked about the so-called “quiet boycott” carried out by the opposition parties that gave instructions to their local branches to try to marginalize the Referendum and keep it out of public view. Their reaction was personal, having labeled it “the vote of confidence in Dodik”. This detail is especially interesting in the light of the fact that all the parties without exception voted in favor of holding the nation-wide plebiscite in the parliament earlier.
The initiative of questioning the legality of the Republican holiday, which had resulted in the ban of the celebrations, had been put forward by a member of the Presidium of Skupstina, Bakir Izetbegovic, representing Bosnian Muslims and leader of the biggest Bonin political party, the Party of Democratic Action (SDA). He happens to be the son of Alija Izetbegovic, the founder of the SDA, who played a significant role in instigating the Bosnian war in the early 1990s. The representative of Bosnian Muslims was also displeased by the fact that the date of the Republican holiday coincides with the Orthodox St Simeon’s day (the saint, who, due to this coincidence, is the patron of Republika Srpska) – allegedly it encroaches on the rights of representatives of other confessions (Catholic Croats and Muslim Bosnians).
Officially the government of Serbia assumed a reserved and somewhat restrained stand in order to not sour the relations with Sarajevo, whereas in fact the Serbian leader had secretly expressed support for the fraternal republic. Probably, the support of Moscow became the decisive one for Banja Luka (the capital of the RS) in this situation. The President of RS, Milorad Dodik, visited Moscow on the eve of the Referendum on September 23 in response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s invitation. The very fact of their meeting became a strong enough signal for Bosnian Serbs that Republika Srpska can count on Russia’s support. The details of the meeting are not widely known but reports have surfaced of a discussion on bilateral cooperation and the situation in the Balkans. The perception was however that Republika Srpska could count on the support from Russia in the face of threats from Sarajevo.
If we put aside the issue of the national holiday itself, we should note the following real consequences of the Referendum: firstly, for the first time after the Dayton Agreement, Banja Luka had worked out and tested the mechanism of a plebiscite, which will now be used to solve other, more important issues – for instance, joining NATO or recognition of the jurisdictions of the centralized Court and Prosecutor’s Office; secondly, not only a symbol of the Serbian entity was protected, but a sample of public opinion was carried out that demonstrated that the authorities do not have to make further ruinous concessions to Sarajevo as they enjoy significant support from the people.
All rights reserved. You have permission to quote freely from the articles provided that the source (www.freewestmedia.com) is given. Photos may not be used without our consent.
Keep your language polite. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in, for example, Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.
If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violations of any law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.
If your comments are subject to preview by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.
We reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.
ParisThe mayors of seven major French cities warned that the continued flood of migrants have them "backed up against a wall". They urged the government of Emmanuel Macron Paris to address the mounting strain on their communities.
German pilots have refused to carry out the planned deportations of rejected asylum seekers.
Christians are currently one of the most persecuted religious groups in the world. US Vice President Mike Pence addressed the In Defense of Christians' fourth-annual national advocacy summit in Washington, DC this week, promising aid.
Two of Italy’s wealthiest regions will soon hold referendums on whether or not its leaders should push for greater autonomy.
ParisOn Friday morning 2 500 migrants were evacuated from the Port de la Chapelle, in Paris after reports of growing tensions and their squalid living conditions had surfaced.
Bill Gates has warned that Europe's open-door immigration policy is heading for a disaster.
OPINIONOpinion: French Lawyer Dr. Elie Hatem on the latest crisis between Qatar and its neighbours – and the role of Ankara
ParisMarine Le Pen, the French presidential frontrunner, questioned the Pope for pressuring European countries to open their borders to migrants, accusing him of meddling in politics.
ParisAll eyes were on a key election debate broadcast live last night in France between the presidential candidates.
OPINIONUkraine's key “nationalist” forces signed the so-called National Manifesto — a solid plan to demolish what’s left of failed Ukrainian statehood, which has been barely keeping its head above water since EuroMaidan.