Monsanto, EPA colluded to kill cancer findings
The chemical powerhouse Monsanto's controversial herbicide, Roundup is carcinogenic, court documents revealed.
Published: March 15, 2017, 8:02 am
Some 17 cancer experts from 11 countries reviewed the evidence and already unanimously came to this conclusion in 2015 about the blockbuster weedkiller. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) had called for the review.
Monsanto has touted the approval of the chemical by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), but newly unsealed court documents released this week, show a startling effort on the part of both Monsanto and the EPA to work in concert to discredit independent cancer research conducted by the World Health Organisation’s International Agency the IARC.
Excerpts from the document show how the EPA effectively declared Roundup safe for use without conducting tests on the actual formulation, but instead relying on industry research on just one of the product’s active ingredients.
“EPA’s minimal standards do not require human health data submissions related to the formulated product – here, Roundup. Instead, EPA regulations require only studies and data that relate to the active ingredient, which in the case of Roundup is glyphosate. As a result, the body of scientific literature EPA has reviewed is not only primarily provided by the industry, but it also only considers one part of the chemical ingredients that make up Roundup.”
Glyphosate, the main ingredient in the Monsanto’s flagship product Roundup, the most widely applied pesticide worldwide.
Donna Farmer, Monsanto’s lead toxicologist, however admitted in her deposition that she “cannot say that Roundup does not cause cancer” because “[w]e [Monsanto] have not done the carcinogenicity studies with Roundup.”
Farmer’s actual email, from back in 2009, states: “You cannot say that Roundup does not cause cancer.. we have not done carcinogenicity studies with “Roundup”.
And while the revelations above are quite damning by themselves, other related issues have also come to the fore: In early 2015, once it became clear that the World Health Organisation’s IARC was working on their own independent study of Roundup, Monsanto immediately launched their own efforts to preemptively discredit any results that might be deemed “inconvenient”.
Monsanto decided to “ghost-write” key sections of their report themselves and plotted to have the independent scientists “sign their names so to speak” to these sections.
“A less expensive/more palatable approach might be to involve experts only for the areas of contention, epidemiology and possibly MOA (depending on what comes out of the IARC meeting), and we ghost-write the Exposure Tox & Genetox sections…but we would be keeping the cost down by us doing the writing and they would just edit & sign their names so to speak.”
Jess Rowland, the EPA’s Deputy Division Director for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention and chair of the Agency’s Cancer Assessment Review Committee, assured the company that he would kill any potentially damaging research. “If I can kill this I should get a medal,” Rowland boasted.
The US. Department of Agriculture does not monitor American food for glyphosate residues, reportedly because testing is “extremely expensive”.
Research in 18 European countries found that 44 percent of tested city-dwellers had glyphosate residue in their urine and testing of 35 urine samples from US women found glyphosate levels 10 times higher than those in the European report. The testing, done by Moms Across America and Sustainable Pulse, also found glyphosate in three of 10 samples of breast milk from US women.
Samples tested by the US Geological Survey show that glyphosate contaminates air and water in agricultural areas.
Glyphosate is also used as a desiccant to dry wheat before harvest. Government testing in Britain showed that more than 60 percent of nearly 3 000 bread samples contained pesticide residues, with glyphosate being one of the most frequently detected chemicals.
But Monsanto CEO Hugh Grant denied the link: “Roundup is not a carcinogen. It’s 40 years old, it’s been studied,” he told Here & Now’s Jeremy Hobson in an interview last year a month after 94 scientists from around the world came out in defense of the IARC’s original findings.
The scientists published their findings in an article for the peer-reviewed Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. The paper argues that the authors of the EFSA’s Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) dismissed incidences of glyphosate-induced cancer in lab animals as chance occurrences and also ignored important laboratory and human mechanistic evidence of genotoxicity.
Government officials in France, The Netherlands, Sweden and Italy are pushing firmly against the herbicide’s relicensing in the European Union over health and safety risks.
All rights reserved. You have permission to quote freely from the articles provided that the source (www.freewestmedia.com) is given. Photos may not be used without our consent.
Keep your language polite. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in, for example, Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.
If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violations of any law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.
If your comments are subject to preview by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.
We reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.
WashingtonThe number of illegal immigrants that voted in recent US elections was likely far greater than previous estimates, a new study revealed. As many as 5.7 million illegals may have voted in the 2008 election, securing the White House for Barack Obama.
WashingtonAmericans are not happy with their news media, as almost six in 10 say it makes them angry and dissatisfied in a new poll. It may also be the trending topic from the appearance by ex-FBI director James Comey in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
New YorkThis week the New York Times misrepresented Putin's denial Russia that engages in hacking to insinuate an admission of a Russian role in hacking the Democratic campaign to stop Hillary Clinton from being elected.
WashingtonHillary Clinton once famously said "We came, we saw, he died" cackling about the murder of Muammar Ghaddafi of Libya her country unleashed. But her daughter Chelsea for one, does not appreciate gags about killing presidents:
WashingtonAmerican Senator Rand Paul blasted the Paris climate accord on Thursday for being unfair after President Donald Trump made good on his campaign promise to withdraw from the Paris climate agreement.
WashingtonHenry Kissinger once called Zbigniew Brzezinski a "total whore", the Washington Post revealed. His legacy in Washington's foreign policy lives on after Afghanistan, today in Ukraine.
WashingtonThe FBI director that was fired by President Trump, James Comey, was a Hillary Clinton insider. His career actually highlights the unhealthy relationship that exists between major corporations and the political elite.
Another huge cyberattack is underway after last week's assault on computers worldwide, according to a global cybersecurity firm, suggesting military-grade cyberweapons are now being deployed for cyber crime.
WashingtonThe American author of a best-selling book about the Clinton's dark secrets, believes president Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner has created "a massive, massive problem " for the White House.
SeongjuThe newest, the American anti-ballistic system THAAD, just went operational in South Korea, but both sides of the 38th Parallel and above the Yalu River, that is North as well as South Korea is unhappy about the president Trump's latest move and it could swing the outcome of elections in South Korea.