Skip to Content

Photo from SAA, Facebook

Trump’s revised policy on Syria means staying

James Jeffrey, the US State Department’s special representative for Syria, has spelled out the Trump administration’s policy towards Syria quite clearly.

Published: September 9, 2018, 9:11 am

    The US has no intention to withdraw its military presence from Syria, as announced by the special representative for Syria, Jeffrey, on 6 September.

    According to Jeffrey, the Trump administration wants to remain in Syria in order to reduce Iranian influence and prevent Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad from consolidating power.

    President Donald Trump supports the strategy that envisions an indefinite military and diplomatic presence in Syria, contrary to the President’s previous inclination to withdraw US troops after defeating ISIS, Jeffrey said.

    “The new policy is we’re no longer pulling out by the end of the year,” he told the media in Washington.

    It was first stated that the 2 200 US troops deployed to eastern Syria in support of the multi-national coalition against ISIS, were going to leave. Now they will remain to bolster a combined military and diplomatic effort to limit Iranian and Russian influence over post-war reconstruction.

    “That means we are not in a hurry,” Jeffrey said, adding that he was “confident” Trump supports what he called a “more active approach” in Syria.

    The Daily Caller reported that the strategy had been under consideration for within the Trump administration for months, but stalled because of Trump’s reluctance to deepen the US involvement in Syria.

    “We’ve started using new language,” Jeffrey said, referring to previous warnings against the use of chemical weapons. This time, he added, the United States will not tolerate “an attack. Period”. But he did not elaborate on the “attack”.

    According to Turkish outlet Hurriyet daily, James Jeffrey’s remarks also hint at a more active US diplomacy against the Bashar al-Assad rule and its main supporters, Russia and Iran.

    This new policy has already been observed at the UN Security Council where the US, France and Britain have taken positions against the potential use of chemical weapons by the Syrian government in Idlib and elsewhere in the country.

    In support of the Idlib operation, Russia has deployed a significant naval presence in the eastern Mediterranean, with weaponry capable of reaching across Syria. The presidents of Russia, Turkey and Iran gathered in Tehran on Friday to hold their third summit on a Syrian settlement.

    US Marines have meanwhile conducted a live-fire aerial assault exercise in southern Syria on Friday, The Washington Post reported.

    It was designed as a warning to Russia and the Syrian government against a planned offensive in Idlib province in northwest Syria, the largest remaining pocket of jihadist fighters.

    Over the past seven years the jihadists with foreign backing, have tried but failed to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad.

    The Marine exercise took place near the US garrison at al Tanf, along the Syrian-Iraqi border near Jordan, in the area of a “deconfliction zone”. It followed a Russian notification – and subsequent US rejection – of a plan to enter the zone to pursue terrorists.

    Russian presidential aide Yuri Ushakov told TASS ahead of the meeting that the three leaders were going to discuss the expected chemical provocation by jihadists in the area.  “They will also touch upon the possibility of various provocations staging the use of chemical weapons by Damascus.”

    White Helmet surrogates delivered a large shipment of toxic substances to a warehouse used by jihadists in Idlib province, Maj. Gen. Alexei Tsygankov, head of the Russian Center for Syrian Reconciliation, warned last week.

    But their are still calls in the US for re-arming the jihadists. The “eminent scholar” Anthony Cordesman of CSIS just advised to re-up such supplies to al-Qaeda aligned Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the former Jabhat Al-Nusra Front, which has controlled large areas of Idlib since 2015, acting as de facto governmental authority, facilitating trade across the long border with Turkey and organising so-called aid deliveries.

    But any US attack on Syrian and Russian forces in Idlib would likely escalate into a conflict between nuclear powers.


    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    Middle East

    Trump accused of rape a day after he cancels strike on Iran

    New YorkPresident Donald Trump has been accused of "rape" by a journalist only a day after he pulled back on a decision to strike Iran.

    Attack on two tankers blamed on Iran after ‘US Government Assessment’

    WashingtonThe Trump Administration has officially concluded that Iran is responsible for Thursday's attacks in the Strait of Hormuz against two tankers, the Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Thursday during a press briefing. But his choice of words are quite telling.

    Pentagon admits that Russia is restricting US air sovereignty

    In response to the covert warfare waged by Western and Arab Gulf states for regime change in Syria, Russia has introduced its dreaded S-400 air defense system there. The Russian decision has had global consequences.

    Top US Israel lobby turns against Trump over Syria withdrawal

    WashingtonUS President Donald Trump’s decision to pull American troops out of Syria has created a serious policy dispute with Israel, with an influential pro-Israel lobby turning against the President for the first time since he took office.

    Will the US really withdraw from Syria?

    WashingtonAmerican troops are preparing to leave northeast Syria, according to President Trump. But will the US really leave Syria?

    Israel boasts most surveillance companies

    An article in an Israeli newspaper has documented how Israeli firms are supplying surveillance technology to countries across the world.

    Murder of Khashoggi: The straw that broke the camels back?

    Three traditional strategic positions in the Middle East have reached tipping points and are likely to change due to the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi's murder in Istanbul: US relations with Saudi Arabia, Turkey's role in the Middle East and Israel's strategic defenses.

    China to control all Israeli ports by 2021

    Tel AvivTwo Israeli port facilities being upgraded by China may have security ramifications for Israel and its closest ally, the United States.

    Taking money from murderers

    WashingtonSaudi Arabia employs - through consultants - a host of retired American generals, diplomats, intelligence experts that get paid exorbitant amounts of money.

    German analyst: ‘Saudi Arabia the most dedicated sponsor of terror’

    Saudi Arabia has been repeatedly accused of funding terrorism all over the world, including in Syria and Iran. Research by Edward Clifford in his book "Financing Terrorism: Saudi Arabia and Its Foreign Affairs", has shown the extent of Saudi support for terror.

    Go to archive