Skip to Content

Renaud Camus Renaud Camus. Flickr/Own work

The Great Replacement and the tragedy of Sweden

Published: October 23, 2016, 11:22 am

  • Français

I love Sweden passionately. I once dedicated a thick volume of my travel collection “Demeures de l’esprit” [Dwellings of the mind] to its homes of painters, writers, composers, poets, film makers. I think that life has rarely been as happy as in Pajala, at Læstadius’s place in Lapland by the shores of the raging Torne river, or on the road leading to the cottage of Dan Andersson, Loussastugan in Dalarna. This is why the fate of Sweden makes me suffer as much as that of France, or Great Britain or Belgium. But the case of Sweden is even more tragic, more extreme, more insane. Nowhere else do a people and a nation show a stronger will to suicide.

I am talking about replacement, as a common reference, of high culture by mass culture.

Why? Why? In ”La Deuxième Carrière d’Adolph Hitler” (The second career of Adolf Hitler) I argued that Europe never recovered from the Hitler trauma, that it was like a patient afflicted with a form of cancer, Nazism, and that overly zealous surgeons continued operating endlessly until, at the slightest indication of the disease, all vital organs were removed: no more heart, brain, lungs, nerves, virility, limbs. Hitler comes up in all our sentences, as an inverted reference, as the absolute figure of the negative; and his career as a ghost, his second career, reversed, though less criminal than the first one, has had even more severe consequences, since it means the death of Europe. That which racism had failed to accomplish in 1945 – the destruction of European civilization – antiracism is today a step away from achieving.

This antiracism draws its indisputable legitimacy from the death camps, and the ever so understandable ”never again”, but in the society that it builds it is no longer possible to teach the Holocaust, since the protégés of this antiracism won’t tolerate it, and Jews flee our continent every year by the thousands.

Is Sweden trying, more or less consciously, to atone for having been less firmly hostile to the Third Reich than perhaps it should have been? I don’t know. One may think that in its puritanical zeal to do the right thing it always goes too far in one direction or the other. Maybe this masochistic lunacy should be seen as Sweden displaying a new fit of the pious frenzy which wreaked so much havoc in Scandinavia during the second half of the 19th century, to which Ibsen, Dreyer, Munch or the very same Laestadius, have all borne witness, each in his own way. The neurotic dimension of the current situation appears unquestionable to me. Do we have to remind ourselves that hospitality obviously never consisted of letting oneself be invaded by uncountable guests, not particularly friendly, surrendering one’s home or homeland to them, and finally having to beg them to leave you a little spot somewhere and some rights, in what used to be your own country? Not only has no moral principle ever demanded that, but all morals have condemned it severely as a terrible complacency in the face of death, a renunciation of our ancestors and an unjust sacrifice of the generations to come.

The case of Sweden, though horrible in my eyes, is also totally fascinating. I am actually convinced that the phenomenon that I call The Great Replacement – the changing of people and population, the demographic submersion, the ethnic replacement – to which all of Europe is subjected, but especially Western Europe, is in fact, despite its enormity, only part of a larger movement, replacism, the ideology of general interchangeability, humans by humans, peoples by peoples, men by women, human beings by machines, the living by inanimate objects, animals by things, as in those horrible meat factories where poor animals who will never see neither grass nor sky are literally being produced, like inanimate objects and, even worse, will often meet the halal death. Replacism is a whole. Those who do not understand that replacism is a whole, cannot understand anything about The Great Replacement. And Sweden, if we are to believe the horrified echoes that reach our disbelieving ears, is the most advanced laboratory for this global replacism, the production industry of the undifferentiated human matter.

Is it true that little Swedish boys have been forbidden to pee standing up? Is it true that Arabic has overtaken Finnish as the second language in the country? Is it true that a little government film calls for Swedes of Swedish descent to merge into a new nation, in which they would only be one component among others, on equal standing with the others, probably waiting for the Islamic triumph to put them in an inferior position as a conquered and subjugated people, as dhimmis? It is not only the Nobel Prize in Literature being bestowed on Bob Dylan that evinces this global replacism, in this case The Small Replacement, which is a prerequisite for the Great one, since people who know their classics will not let themselves be thrown on the ash heap of history without rebelling. I am talking about replacement, as a common reference, of high culture by mass culture.

The worst aspect is that the horror now taking place could still be avoided. It would be enough for the European peoples to wake up, to get out of the vegetative state in which the education of oblivion and the industry of stupor have put hem. I do not believe in the possibility, to paraphrase Stalin, of antireplacism in a single country. It is our entire continent that is being threatened as to its civilization and its independence. The whole of it has to rebel, and first of all against the traitors that deliver it to the invasion. If some talk of civil war, they are nevertheless mistaken. The fight we must lead resembles much more a classic war of independence, an anticolonial rebellion. The means and the ends are one and the same: remigration – the return of the conquering peoples to their own lands.

Renaud Camus

Renaud Camus (b. 1946) is one of the better-known writers and thinkers in France. He has published numerous novels, poems, travelogues and diaries, and is also known for having created the expression ”Le grand remplacement”, The Great Replacement. In 1977 he was awarded the Fénéon prize for his “Échange” (Exchange), in 2003 the “30 millions d’amis” (30 million friends) for the “Vie du chien Horla” (The life of Horla the dog) and in 2015 the Jean Ferré prize for his complete works and their defence of the French language.

Exclusively for

Consider donating to support our work

Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

  • Websurfer Cat

    Good luck with that.

  • anibanib

    What a load of lies and crap about Sweden

  • Is Sweden trying, more or less consciously, to atone for having been less firmly hostile to the Third Reich than perhaps it should have been? I don’t know. One may think that in its puritanical zeal to do the right thing it always goes too far in one direction or the other. Maybe this masochistic lunacy should be seen as Sweden displaying a new fit of the pious frenzy which wreaked so much havoc in Scandinavia during the second half of the 19th century, to which Ibsen, Dreyer, Munch or the very same Laestadius, have all borne witness, each in his own way.

    It was in fact Jewish moralistic terrorism that murdered the Swedish nation. It might be fair to say that a very common self-image as a “humanitarian nation” among the Swedes was a necessary precondition. And it might also be true that the totalitarian aspect of Swedish (and Norwegian, though to a somewhat lesser extent) would not have come about without that prehistory of Lutheran pietism. But the terroristic exploitation of that mindset and self-image by a certain Jewish clicque in Stockholm was the major active ingredient in this genocidal witches’ brew. The newspaper mentioned in the long quote below was, and still is, owned by the Jewish Bonnier family. In that sense they were the main instigators, by way of moralistic terrorism and extortion, of the murderous “multicult” in Sweden. And that same newspaper, still owned by that same family, has also been the most aggressive promoter of mass immigration during the last couple of decades.

    Lars-Erik Hansen’s dissertation Equality and freedom to choose. A study in the emergence of Swedish Immigration Policy (Stockholm University, Department of History, 2001) lists the actors who were a driving force in the debate to introduce the new multicultural policy. Regarding the actors, the study confirms previous academic research on how multiculturalism arose, such as Henry Román’s study En invandrarpolitisk oppositionell : debattören David Schwarz syn på svensk invandrarpolitik åren 1964-1993 [An immigration policy opponent: commentator David Schwarz’s view of Swedish immigration policy 1964-1993] who attributes Schwarz “a crucial role” in the game behind the introduction of the new policy. Thus, the ideological change started in 1964 when David Schwarz, a Polish born Jew and “Holocaust” survivor who immigrated to Sweden in the early 1950s, wrote the article “The Immigration problem in Sweden” in Sweden’s largest and most important morning newspaper – the Jewish-owned Dagens Nyheter (“Daily News”). It started a rancorous debate that mostly took place in Dagens Nyheter, but which subsequently continued even in other newspapers, on editorial pages and in books. Hansen (2001) writes in his thesis (p. 115):

    The leading debaters who were the first to claim minority rights and conditions were especially David Schwarz, Inga Gottfarb, Amadeo Cottio, Voldemer Kiviaed, Géza Thinsz and Lukasz Winiarki – all of which had an immigrant background.

    Besides Schwarz, Gottfarb had Jewish descent. Kiviaed was Estonian, Géza Thinsz immigrated from Hungary in 1956 (the same year as the massive persecution of Jews started which would have the effect that within a few decades half of Hungary’s Jews had fled the country) and Lukasz Winiarki immigrated from Poland. Schwarz was by far the most active opinion-former and accounted for 37 of a total of 118 contributions to the debate on the immigration issue in the years 1964-1968. Schwarz and his co-thinkers were so dominant and aggressive that debaters with an alternative view were driven on the defensive and felt their views suppressed. For example, Schwarz played the anti-Semitism card efficiently in order to discredit his opponents. Hansen writes (pp. 114, 126-128, 217):

    An increasing number of commentators and publishers made similar criticisms against what they saw as the majority’s lack of understanding of minorities’ conditions, particularly in the non-clearly stated, yet what many saw as a real policy of assimilation, which they feared would lead to an erasure of the different minority cultures and life patterns to amount to the rectifying or conformist national majority’s established pattern. Strongest in this criticism was David Schwarz and Voldemar Kiviaed – they claimed that the assimilation zealots appeared in the spirit of the Russians in the Baltic states and that their approach could also be compared with Eichmann’s ‘final solution’, although in more humane shape. Increased government action was required to avoid assimilation, partly by direct financial support to minorities, partly by an official policy for a pluralistic society. […]

    The policy toward Jewish immigration to Sweden, especially during World War II, was put forward as a blot in the Swedish political history. Bruno Kaplan, head of the teaching of the Jewish community in Stockholm and represented in the World Jewish Congress, lined up a number of examples of this regulatory policy (exclusion model), partly student protest against importation of some Jewish doctors in 1938, partly a number of leading newspapers which warned of this immigration. Leif Zern [who, like Kaplan, is Jewish, blogger’s note] emphasized Kaplan’s view that it was clear from the then existing policy that there was anti-Semitism, and stressed: “Of course there are no statistics on how many Jews the feature (the regulation of Jewish immigration) led to the gas chambers.” […]

    Bruno Kaplan was convinced that the survival of a small Jewish minority depended on how the state and municipalities acted – a policy that advocated tolerance and respect for minority distinctiveness was necessary. In this spirit should the Jewish minority, in their efforts to preserve their identity, get the full support from Swedish society. […]

    David Schwarz was the most active debater in the immigrant issue, his views and values had a major impact. David Schwarz became the first and foremost spokesman of the pluralistic state intervention model […]

    In the official immigrant debate, some players played a big role in the policy process, especially adherents of multiculturalism. […] They encouraged the political parties to address the issue of ethnic equality on the agenda. Then, a veritable race began to see who was the biggest and best in the immigrant issue.

    The debate gave rise to government investigations such as Invandrarutredningen (The Immigrant Investigation) 1968 which formed the basis for the government’s bill (1975:26) on guidelines for immigrant and minority policy which was adopted by a totally unanimous Swedish Parliament in 1975. David Schwarz got what he wanted, which was to be a fateful decision whose consequences we see the results of today. Red Ice, 13 July2015. How and why Sweden became multicultural

    • Quantum Satis

      Until about an hour ago, I was firmly convinced to keep my arguments clean from pointing out the “usual suspects” even if I’m aware. Then by chance I came across something I at first thought was a “fake-fake-news” attempt – which it is CLEARLY not – called: JewTube | Curated Jewish Videos . Revealing as such, but what really pissed me off was their link and comment for this “jewish moralistic terrorism” video:

      “Google it if you want more details. Another explanation behind the lack of barely any mention of her strong Israeli background in her PR materials might be a reflection of the current international mood that is as reflexively critical of anything Israel-related as it has ever been.”

      • Lillemor

        Jeg har skrevet skjevt om (((feiil folk))) og får ikke lenger uttale meg eller stemme på doc. Men jeg liker historikken din 🙂

    • Lawrence

      My God! Never forget, never forgive…

  • Carol Stinkie

    The situation in Sweden today has nothing to do with the thinking of Ibsen or others in the 19th century or the Swedish relationship to the Third Reich 75 years ago. It has everything to with the fact that Sweden has had non-stop social engineering applied to it for since at least the 1950’s or earlier. Powerful tools like television and ultra-rich internationalist families like the Bonniers who control key positions in the media, with input from American internationalists like Barbera Lerner-Specter have transformed a once proud and noble people into a weak, effete, self-hating nation of weak fools. Sweden has been used as a test bed to learn about the weaknesses of the white man and all that has been learned in the past three quarters of a century in Sweden have been use with great effect on the white South Africans 30 years ago and now the rest of us now. The number one thing we need to teach ourselves is to get rid of feelings that it’s too late to do anything now. The dust has settled and we have to accept our lot and our destiny. It’s never too late, as long as there are any whites left. People need to turn off the televisions permanently, put the newspapers under the kitty litter where they belong and only use the computer for constructive purposes that further the interests of our race. If you are young or old, get strong, work out. Constantly teach yourself new skills that will be useful in the future struggle. If you can, get trained in the use of firearms and if you live in a country that still allows you to own one, buy one and become skilled in the use of it.

  • Emilio Lamaar





    Over the past 40+ years, tens upon tens of millions of men’s lives have been destroyed through divorce. Hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of those men, upon realizing that their future was destroyed, committed
    suicide. How did this happen?

    Laws are already in place to specifically privilege women over men and to give women easy access to destroy men’s lives (no-fault divorce, Title IX, Yes Means Yes, Affirmative Action, the VAWA, etc).

    Men had overcome the middle ages, fought for human rights, liberal laws and freedom. All these achievements of humanity have been destroyed by feminism in few years.

    Normally, American’s can’t be jailed for debt because debtors’ prisons were thought to be a nonsensical and barbaric practice that was outlawed in 1833.

    Yet, the failure to pay child routinely lands American fathers in jail. Even if the fathers become unemployed or hospitalized, the judge could deny their petition to have their child support payments reduced.

    Feminism has created a dictatorship, destroyed civil rights and due process, equality under the law and presumtion of innocence, like in rape acusations and domestic violence laws, created dozens of new crimes
    (sexual harassment, offenses to women, DNA testing your own kid in Britain, afirmative consent, etc).

    Such men can either suffer the rest of their lives in poverty, in the Gulag jail of feminist dictatorship. Or they can act like men and fight back.

    Men are repressed cradle to grave. In kindergarten and primary school, boys fall behind because female-only teaching staff gears school towards girl’s preferences and punishes boys for being boys.

    Female indoctrination continues through University, where a terror regime of sexual harassment laws stifles academic freedom and research.

    It is a serious problem: how to defend your human rights against the terror regime of the majority? The Nürnberg process against Nazi henchmen convicted those who followed legitimate but inhumane orders. So what are the legal rights of a man destroyed by inhumane laws that are against democratic human rights traditions but that are the law of the land? What are the rights of a man convicted to painful death by medieval inquisition or Afghan religious courts that are the law of the land and supported by a wide majority?

    Men had the power for thousands of years. They did not enslave women. They did not invent crimes to lock them up in prison for decades. They fought for due process and other legal guarantees for men and women.

    Women managed to undo all this, imprison men, disappropriate men, enslave men, take over school education, drug boys with Ritalin, arrest 6 year old boys for sexual harassment and scare adult men with harassment
    charges and an entire sexual harassment industry. Finally false rape allegations that are always believed because “women don’t lie”.

    Additionally underage sex crime persecution for normal adolescent sex, false child abuse accusations, trumped-up child porn allegations for simple possession of movies of fully dressed 15 year old girls (Knox vs. USA)
    and minimum sentencing mandates that outrage even judges.

    State sponsor terrorism against the male population, the Spanish Nazi courts

    “False Accusations in Spain”

    Spain has 106 courts set up to punish men (but not women) for domestic violence.

    The last time a nation set up a demographic court to punish one particular demographic was in 1930 when the Nazis set up a system of courts to pass judgment on jews.

    The birthrate in countries that pander to feminism and misandry (man-hating) are, without exception, showing huge declines in their birthrates and net population increases.

    Spain, Denmark, Germany, France and the UK are all panicking because their fertility rates are so low, that their indigenous populations will be extinct within a century. In addition, all of those countries have huge
    social obligations to aging populations, and, those obligations are coming due as there are not enough young people to pay into socialist systems for the care of their elders.

    One of the ways that the elite, in Western European countries (and the US) are trying to see if it will improve the declining populations, is to have open borders so that men will come from North African countries (mostly)
    to have sex with Western European women.

    Feminism, in Western European countries, has been unchallenged for over 60 years, and, is now de rigeur in all institutions, especially Europe’s public indoctrination (education) system. Hatred of men, and masculinity, in
    Western European nations, is open and oppressive to men. It is one of the factors driving the gender suicide gap world-wide (in which men are committing suicide at 4 times the rate of women). It is also the
    principal reason behind the decline in birth rates, and, the net population decreases.

    Spain’s approach has been to appoint a “sex czar” to encourage Spanish men to have sex with Spanish women.

    The problem is that Spain hates men, so much, that virtually every aspect of Spain’s institutions, its economy, its politics and its social interaction between men and women is now so toxic for men that only men with nothing to lose can afford to have sex with Spanish women.

    Let’s take an example. If a woman who is spiteful in Spain (a large number of women fall in this category) all she has to do is accuse a man of sexual misconduct, or “domestic violence” and he is thrown in prison. No questions asked. If he can prove he is innocent, he might get out.

    If he can’t, he’s branded a rapist, or a wife-beater, and, the rest of his life is ruined. Whether the accusations against him are true or false,the Government immediately pays the woman for making the accusations (at
    the rate of 400 euros per month). This scheme is reminiscent of the fascism of Franco’s rule when, in 1944, he enacted laws punishing “contempt for gender” (which were exclusively enforced against men).

    More than 60,000 men victims of feminist nazi courts have comited suicide in Spain, nobody knows how many more have killed themselves with drugs and alcohol abuse, two millions of orphan children and several millions of men in total poverty…….

    They have killed more men than the spainish inquisitionin during his terror regime

    “The ‘Inquisition’ was actually a series of tribunals set up, originally to combat what the Catholic Church considered heresy. The most famous of these was the Spanish Inquisition, and the limited evidence that survives suggests that around 5000 executions took place on the orders of the Spanish Inquisition. The Inquisition set up in the Netherlands was responsible for a further 2000 executions. Most other Inquisition
    tribunals resulted in far fewer executions, since most of their victims were sensible enough to recant their heresies and seek ‘forgiveness’. ”

    More men killed than american soldiers during Vietnam war

    “The Vietnam Conflict Extract Data File of the Defense Casualty Analysis System (DCAS) Extract Files contains records of 58,220 U.S. military fatal casualties of the Vietnam War. ”

    Did you know male suicides are registered as car accidents? did you know it is forbiden for the media to report it? or for the national media to report murders comited by women against men or children, you will find those
    only in the local media. That is how it is in the repugnant christianofeminazy spanish regime.


    As the night follows the day divorce follows marriage, 95% of people married ten years ago are divorced.

    National Survey of Family Growth:

    Separated and divorced men who end up impoverished or on the streets as they struggle to maintain themselves while keeping up child support and alimony payments.

    Stories about divorced Italian young fathers sleeping on the streets or in their cars is not exactly a strong advertising for fatherhood.

    Men see this and are turned off from pursuing becoming a father, Women see this and can’t find a suitable mate. No one gives a damn after this.

    In Italy, where nearly one-fourth of childbearing women will never give birth, it is nevertheless a pretty dramatic and disturbing trend. Across the Western world.

    The laughter of little children, whose disappearance from the streets and courtyards of this once flourishing country paints a dark future.

    So where have they all gone?

    You will cry after watching this video !

  • Emilio Lamaar

    Islam could save The West. One only needs to look to Russia, Chechnya and Team Putin/Kadyrov to see what Islam and Christianity, living together and not corrupted, can look like.

    What would happen if the entirety of Europe’s barbarian, “infidel” whites were to become Muslim?

    Would all of us suddenly sport power beards and yell Alla hu akbar? No.

    In fact, as of right now, the first and most immediate benefit to us as marginalized and attacked European, heterosexual white men would be that we become a protected group, 100% beyond criticism by liberals, feminists and the left. The best advantage for white women would be Muslims can no longer rape them, since they are no longer “whores.”

    Islam could save The West.

    One only needs to look to Russia, Chechnya and Team Putin/Kadyrov to see what Islam and Christianity, living together and not corrupted, can look like.

    I understand and respect many who fear Islam and Sharia law. If not Europeans as a race will completely disappear.

    As much as Westerners are fearing Islam’s takeover, I can guarantee you that puritanism and her sister feminism is far, far, far worst.

    Can you imagine the shock in mosques around Europe and America if they were to be flooded with white faces seeking to take the shahadah? If the European race conquered the whole of the world under a false, pagan interpretation of the One True God that was Christianity, what would Europeans be capable of if they converted to, by Islam’s own admission and call to faith, the true and final revelation of the One True God we already know and have a long historical relationship with?

    I leave you with the following quandary I don’t think I am alone in contemplating some nights before bed.

    If you had only two possible futures to choose from living in The West,

    (1) forced submission to the goddess and her leftist matriarchy, which includes feminism, LGBTism and the politics of race, identity and gender,


    (2) voluntary submission to the patriarchal God of Islam and his Prophet (PBUH), which is a return to an Abrahamic faith that includes recognition of Jesus, the heterosexual family unit and traditional gender roles where man is once again respected, which one would you choose.

    Albania women are probably the most attractive european type of women, attractive both physically and spiritually.

    Christopher Hitchens said that Islam is unique in its unchanging nature compared to other religions. Actually, there are many Muslim societies with their own culture mixed in but the core is the same among them all.

    And Islam doesn’t actually allow pedophelia, it allows marriage with someone over the age of prepubescence. Which was the way the West, and the whole of mankind, did until the recent age of consent concept (which reduces the chances of getting a high quality woman). That’s pretty much the only way to get a virgin in the west.

    The average cuck Christian I run into ever Sunday emphasizes your point. It is a religion that, while strong and proud in its heritage, has devolved into one run by feminine (weak) principles, and not by muscle as in centuries past. Which men are to defend this? The ones in their flip-flops and wispy beards, or the Crusaders of old — or even a reasonable facsimile?

    The Church has been colonised by feminazis. Now there are female bishops, expect the situation to get worse. In the C of E, men with third rate minds are afraid of women with second rate minds.

    Western men have ZERO desire to protect women from radical Islam. Think about it. What am I defending? No fault divorce? Transexualizing of children? Abortion on demand? “Democratic tyranny”? Sorry, I don’t feel motivated to maintain the factory that builds my chains.

    Since women are capable of standing by and watching men get ravaged by divorce courts, crap wars, suicide rates, double standards, Title 9, and 50 years of cultural bashing, I am capable of standing by and watching women and their cohorts in leftism the LGBT get stoned to death or thrown off buildings.

    They hate me? Well, I hate them.

    Now that men are opting out of marriage in record numbers and the birth rate is collapsing in Westernized nations, and men starting to convert to ISLAM, they are afraid. If you want to see the future of the US and all Westernized nations, look to Sweden.


Russia’s loss at Kharkov highlights crippling shortage of men

KharkovThe frontline in this case relied on heavily outnumbered 2nd rate Lugansk draftees plucked from the LPR.

A country without an honest media is lost

For some time I have reported to you that in place of a media, a media that our founding fathers relied on to protect our society, the United States has had a propaganda ministry whose sole purpose is to destroy our society.

Sweden’s decaying democracy

A journalist is arrested and dragged out of the Gothenburg Book Fair because he politely asked a powerful politician... the wrong questions about his support for the ethnically-cleansed Zimbabwean dictatorship. Not only journalists, but academics and bloggers are being hounded by the leftist establishment daily. And the leftists have all the nasty instruments of the state at their disposal. Citizen reporter Fabian Fjälling looks into their excesses.

The geopolitical future of Nordic countries

Between unity and disunity, independence and foreign interference: Nordic countries have to either choose between creating an independent neutral block in the North, or seeing the region being divided between the great powers.

Russian, Chinese intelligence: ISIS heading for Central Asia with US cover

Operatives of the crumbling Islamic State in Syria and Iraq (ISIS) are moving to new battlegrounds near the Russian border, intelligence sources have revealed.

The unraveling of US/Russian relations

Washington has taken nuclear war against Russia from a hypothetical scenario to a real danger that threatens the future of humanity. 

Hero commander killed in Syria – when the war is nearly won

For most Syrians it came as a shock: One of the most popular military commanders of the Syrian Arab Army, Issam Zahreddine, was killed on 18 October 2017.

What Is The Obama Regime Up To?

Obama has announced new sanctions on Russia based on unsubstantiated charges by the CIA.

Kevork Almassian: Aleppo resisted and triumphed

OPINIONEven the Western Mainstream Media couldn’t hide the celebrations and the joy of the civilians in Aleppo, who expressed their gratitude to the Syrian Army and Russia.

Lebanon’s new president: Michel Aoun


Go to archive