Skip to Content

Joachim Gauck; Norbert Hofer

Interview with Norbert Hofer on presidential role: ‘Balancing and non-partisan’

Norbert Hofer was a candidate in Austria for the office of Federal President in 2016. In the German newsmagazine ZUERST! he explains why he considers a direct election of the President the way forward.

Published: February 20, 2017, 12:47 pm

    Read more

    Sir, the next German President will be elected in February in the Reichstag building in Berlin. In contrast to Austria, in the Federal Republic of Germany, the people do not elect the president, but the so-called Federal Assembly. In Germany, the AfD, in particular, reopened the issue of directly electing the Federal President. What are your experiences in Austria?

    Hofer: The Federal President in Austria enjoys high regard among the people, not least because he is directly elected by the population and thus the degree of recognition is enormously high. His word weighs heavily and he is an essential balance in the power structure between parliament and government.

    The established political parties in Berlin strongly reject direct elections. It is alleged that this would protect the highest office from “populists”. What do you think?

    Hofer: I only recently explained in an interview with an American TV station that the FPÖ is doing so well in the polls because their approaches to the solution are popular. Just one example: about a year ago, we demanded a Burka ban in public spaces, which was dismissed as “populist”. These days, the government parties have agreed on such a ban against the fully veiled and suddenly it is no longer “populist”.

    In Austria, the Federal President is directly elected – you were a candidate for the FPÖ and have just lost against Alexander van der Bellen in the run-up. The country is divided, say the critics of a direct election in the Federal Republic of Germany. Is that so?

    Hofer: I do not believe that our country is divided. If two personalities are from completely different political camps, there is a public discussion and that is also good. The fact that two candidates represent the same views can only be found in totalitarian regimes, such as in North Korea or the former GDR. In any case, the long election campaign in Austria did not lead to a political disinclination or a decline in electoral participation. In this respect, he was of great use to democracy. What clearly emerged in the election campaign is the fact that a wide front – consisting of the Greens, SPÖ, large parts of the ÖVP, NEOS, parliamentarians, Haselsteiner – appeared against me.

    Is an alleged “division of society” at all an argument against a direct election?

    Hofer: People are right in a democracy. Therefore, no one needs to fear a direct democratic decision of the population.

    Another argument against the direct election of the Federal President in the Federal Republic of Germany is that the Office, which is merely representative as in Austria, would thus be charged with more importance and more political influence. But this does not correspond to the function of the Federal President, the critics say …

    Hofer: The Federal President can live out his political weight far better if he can build on the vote of the voters. Otherwise, he is hanging onto the government’s coat-tails. I can not speak here for the Federal Republic of Germany. If the Federal President represents the interests of the entire population, I think that the current regulation of direct elections as in Austria is the proper way.

    In the Federal Republic of Germany, the office of the Federal President is usually “negotiated” in the back room between the parties. Is the highest political office in the state not damaged thereby?

    Hofer: I think the Austrian regulation of direct elections is reasonable. For this reason, I am also a supporter of the expansion of direct democracies on the model of Switzerland. The Austrian Federal President, as a directly elected representative, has the opportunity to act in the best possible interests of the population. Regarding the regulation in the Federal Republic of Germany, I see the danger of too close a proximity to parties, which could lead to the fact that the President of the Federal Republic is not sufficiently independent to warn against a wrong turn.

    What do you think: Why are the government and the opposition parties in Berlin so mistrustful of their own people?

    Hofer: I believe it is not a question of distrust, but of the fact that some governmental individuals are obviously very far from the people. That is precisely why I am such a avid advocate of direct democracy. No politician is immune from going in the wrong direction, but the population can intervene as a corrective.

    Joachim Gauck has already polarized as Federal President: he advocated mass immigration and was more sympathetic towards migrants in eyes of many citizens than towards Germans. He was never impartial, but – especially in the fight against the AfD – very partisan and present in everyday political life. Has he misunderstood his office in your eyes?

    Hofer: I cannot evaluate the leadership style of Joachim Gauck. In any case, I would like the Austrian Federal President to remain equidistant to all political parties, and to be primarily committed to the Austrian population.

    How do you think the “perfect federal president” should act?

    Hofer: In any case, the Federal President should have a balancing and non-partisan view, and he should look to the entire state of the nation.

    Sir, thank you for the interview.

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.


    Vaccine wars: How a solution to end lockdowns is being ignored and criminalized

    LübeckDr Winfried Stöcker has created and produced, in a fast and targeted manner, a recombinant antigen construct for reliable detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. And a formula for a vaccine is "now available to everyone, free of charge," Stöcker's spokeswoman confirmed to FWM. But instead of being hailed as a true trailblazer, the doctor says he now fears for his life.

    Donbass: ‘The world needs to hear all sides’

    WashingtonFormer US diplomat Michael Springmann addressed the situation in Ukraine and Wednesday's online session of the UN Security Council where the foreign ministers of the two unrecognized republics of Donetsk and Lugansk got the opportunity to speak.

    Armenian soldier speaks to FWM: ‘Stabbed in our backs’

    YerevanArthur Danielyan is leader of the Armenian opposition movement “Adekvat”. He volunteered in the Nagorno Karabakh war. In an exclusive interview with FWM he speaks about the recent political turmoil in Armenia and the agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Danielyan was previously detained by the Armenian police for his political activity. This interview was conducted right after his release.

    Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict: ‘This is an attack on the civilized world’

    StepanakertIn the early morning hours of September 27, the conflict in the South Caucasus escalated. Azerbaijan attacked the Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) Republic. Armenia and Azerbaijan appear to be on the verge of war. In an exclusive interview, Manuel Ochsenreiter spoke with David Babayan, the international relations advisor to the President of the Artsakh Republic.

    Turkish agents in Germany ‘a ticking time bomb’

    BerlinIs Turkey spying on Germany? Does Ankara support Turkish extremists in Germany? Stefan Keuter, deputy in the Bundestag for the Eurosceptic AfD party, recently wanted to know exactly what was going on between the two countries. He has received rather disturbing answers from Berlin.

    Polish presidential elections: ‘We don’t like either…’

    WarsawJanusz Korwin-Mikke is one of the most controversial elder statesman, former member of the European Parliament and a politician in Poland. FWM spoke with him exclusively about the presidential elections being held in his country.

    Former Austrian vice chancellor: ‘We want to revive true values of freedom’

    ViennaHC Strache, former vice chancellor of Austria and long-term leader of the Freedom Party (FPÖ) reveals his future plans in an exclusive FWM interview.

    German politician: ‘Why should we risk our relations with China?’

    BerlinDr. Maximilian Krah, member of the European Parliament for the Eurosceptic Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) and Vice Chairman of the EP China Friendship Group in an exclusive FreeWestMedia interview.

    Turkey’s Libya policy: ‘Europe is in danger!’

    BerlinAfD Bundestag Member Stefan Keuter is most concerned about the security risks that Turkey's Libya policy holds for Germany as well as Europe. FWM spoke to Keuter about his reservations.

    Shugaley – ‘A canonical story about a martyr’

    Cinema made in Russia: FWM speaks with director Denis Neimand who produced the movie “Shugaley” about two Russian sociologists kidnapped and tortured in Libya.

    Go to archive