Salvini faces up to 15 years in prison for stopping illegal immigration
During his year at the head of the Italian Ministry of the Interior, Matteo Salvini never stopped fighting illegal immigration. The boss of the League in Italy is accused of kidnapping because he blocked a boat of illegal migrants off the coast of Sicily when he was Minister of the Interior.
Published: February 13, 2020, 8:25 am
This perfectly sound policy has now been turned against him – as a crime. In fact, the Italian Senate authorized on Wednesday, February 12, voted for legal action against the leader of the League, accusing him of kidnapping people, for having blocked a boat of illegal migrants, reported Italian daily Il Giornale. His parliamentary immunity was also lifted by the Senate.
It is a court in Catania (Sicily) which has been accusing the leader of the biggest party in Italy of “abuse of power and forcible confinement of persons” for having blocked 116 migrants for several days on board the Gregoretti, a ship of the Italian coast guard.
If convicted, he faces up to 15 years in prison and ineligibility to be elected as any party representative for six to eight years. But Matteo Salvini will undoubtedly have to wait several years before knowing the final verdict, given the slowness of Italian justice and the possibilities of appeal.
During his speech, before the vote, the strong man of the Italian rightwing “claimed with pride” his action as a minister. He explained that it was his “duty” to defend the country’s borders when he was Minister of the Interior.
“My two children have the right to know that, if their dad was often far from home, it was not to kidnap people but to defend the borders and the security of the country,” he said. “Opponents must be beaten in the ballot boxes, not in the courts,” he said.
Despite somewhat disappointing results in regional elections in the leftist fief of the Emilia-Romagna region recently, the leader of the League remains the most popular politician in Italy and the undisputed champion of political communication.
In his defense, his party could adopt a simple strategy which would be to involve Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, pointing out that blocking the ship was a collective decision. But the interested party disputes this version since according to him, he was not involved in the specific decision of whether to allow the migrants to disembark.
According to Conte the blocking was not made possible by him but by the “approval a new decree-law which strengthened his [Salvini’s] hand. Thus “the choice to make not to disembark the people aboard the Gregoretti, and also when to do it” was as a result of the Security Decree.
Indeed, the Minister of the Interior at the time had passed a law strengthening his powers and providing that “the Minister may limit and prohibit the entry, transit or stopping of ships in territorial waters for reasons order and public security,” reported French daily Le Figaro.
But Matteo Salvini recalled a case similar to Gregoretti, in August 2018, when 177 migrants were also prevented from disembarking. At the time, the government had defended the idea of a “collegial decision” and the Senate had blocked a request for referral to court against Matteo Salvini.
The Senate’s immunity panel had already given the OK for the Catania court of ministers’ request to parliament to proceed against Salvini for allegedly abusing his power and the floor of the Upper House has now ratified the decision to lift Salvini’s parliamentary immunity.
Salvini, who operated a closed ports policy also faced prosecution before but his parliamentary immunity was lifted, but he said he was not afraid of the consequences. “I’m absolutely relaxed about this and proud of what I did,” Salvini told ANSA after the vote, which members of his party did not take part in.
“I’ll do it again as soon as I get back in government. I swore on the Constitution, which says that defending the nation is every citizen’s duty. I will defended Italy,” Salvini said and as in other such cases, his decision was made with the rest of the government he was then part of.
On the day the Senate voted to grant authorization to proceed against Matteo Salvini, a video has popped up in which Prime Minister Conte admitted that the choices which made, were shared by the whole government.
In the video, published on Facebook by the leader of the League, the premier is questioned on the subject during a press conference, and he replies without hesitation: “As regards the Gregoretti ship, I demanded an investigation regarding the e-email. Certainly from the first response there was an involvement of the presidency as has always happened with relocation.”
Salvini told reporters present at Palazzo Madama on Thursday: “I will not run away.” He also wanted to highlight the differences that distinguishes him from his political opponents: “In life I will never ask for judges to judge Conte, Zingaretti or Di Maio. The judgment that matters is that of the people.”
Interviewed on Radio Radio, however, the ex-Minister of the Interior noted: “All those with whom we have always shared these choices, today have vanished, they were not in the Chamber. There was no Conte, Di Maio, Bonafede… Honor and dignity cannot be bought in the supermarket.”
The legislative branch in Italy has meanwhile restarted their full assault on Salvini. In Milan, the prosecutor’s office on Wednesday ended an investigation related to a request by Carola Rackete for Salvini to stand trial on charges of defaming the captain of the Sea Watch 3 migrant rescue ship.
È normale un Paese in cui una signorina tedesca sperona una barca militare e, invece di andare in galera, a processo ci manda il Ministro?
Surreale…https://t.co/691xEduphn— Matteo Salvini (@matteosalvinimi) February 12, 2020
Rackete’s lawyers filed the lawsuit in July 2019. Salvini told ANSA that even if he had to stand trial in another case, “it will simply be yet one more. It isn’t a problem. Someone who rams into Italian military patrol boats has nothing to teach me”.
He added that “in a normal country, would a German lady hitting a military boat result in the interior minister going to trial instead of her? This is surreal.” On this Wednesday, in fact, the request for a six-month extension in investigations by the local prosecutor arrived from Agrigento, where Rackete herself is under investigation for resistance to public officials, ramming a warship and aiding and abetting illegals.
Rackete had ignored all warnings and a ban as she rammed a patrol boat of the Guardia di Finanza at the entrance to the port of Lampedusa last June 29, last year.
The members of the Sea Watch announced the lawsuit through a post published on Twitter: “Salvini will be judged for the defamation to which he made himself responsible towards Carola Rackete. A personal aggression that has endangered the safety of our captain. We will become a civil party in the proceedings.”
For the leader of the League, two trials have emerged within a few hours of each other. But while the one on the Gregoretti has made headlines in the country, the defamation suit brought by Rackete has been largely ignored by the media.
The complaint against Salvini was filed in Milan by Carola Rackete on July 12, 2019. According to the captain of the Sea Watch 3, the reasons for her lawsuit lie in the fact that the former minister “did not use his legitimate right of criticism”, but made aggressive and defamatory statements “to me as a person with direct and indirect threatening tones”. Some words used by Salvini, such as sbruffoncella which means “clown”, “outlaw” and “delinquent” were singled out.
All rights reserved. You have permission to quote freely from the articles provided that the source (www.freewestmedia.com) is given. Photos may not be used without our consent.
Consider donating to support our work
Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.
Keep your language polite. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in, for example, Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.
If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violations of any law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.
If your comments are subject to preview by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.
We reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.
Trump Heralds In New Era: No jus soli
With the stroke of a pen, US President Donald Trump has now made a fundamental decision regarding US citizenship
Digital IDs Coming Despite Previous Disasters
Digital IDs are on the rise. During the pandemic, health was the pretext used by those in power to introduce privacy-violating technology that could quickly exclude people from social functions.
Danish State TV: Ethnic Danish Children Are Undesirable
Eugenic advice from Denmark's TV: "One should probably choose something more exotic" to avoid inbreeding
UK Church Schism Looms with Female Archbishop
The Anglican Church in England has decided to elevate the Bishop of London, a woman, to the rank of archbishop.
Von der Leyen Plans Her Own EU Intelligence Service
Behind the scenes at the European Commission, a power struggle is apparently raging between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and EU High Representative Kaja Kallas
Survey: National Sovereignty is Important to Most Europeans
The notion of an unelected Brussels-led 'empire' is not popular
Britain’s Two-Party System on the Verge of Collapse
Britain is facing a political earthquake – and the winner could be Nigel Farage
Postponed Budapest Summit: Warnings of Assassination Attempt
The planned summit, announced on October 16, 2025, following a phone call between the two leaders, has been indefinitely postponed.

One comment
Let’s see how fast the notoriously slow Italian legal system moves forward with this. This prosecution is purely a political one, by Salvini’s long-time political enemies on the left, and the Italian public is well aware of what is going on. The main aim is to discredit Salvini, and keep this thing over his head as long as possible. If a trial actually materializes, it will be a show trial that clearly indicates the political nature of the prosecution. Any conviction would of course be immediately appealed, adding much more time to the eventual outcome of the case. Meanwhile, Salvini and his allies will be able to make as much or more political capital from this case as his opponents.
By submitting a comment you grant Free West Media a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate and irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin’s discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.