Skip to Content

Cologne, Germany: Google stall at an event inviting participants to "skate and destroy". Photo: Rajeshwar Bachu
Washington

US Justice Department sues monopolist Google for violating antitrust laws

The Department of Justice — along with eleven state Attorneys General — filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Columbia to stop Google from unlawfully maintaining monopolies through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices in the search and search advertising markets and to remedy the competitive harms.

Published: October 21, 2020, 7:30 am

    Read more

    The participating state Attorneys General offices represent Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, South Carolina, and Texas. They are all without exception, Republican.

    “Today, millions of Americans rely on the Internet and online platforms for their daily lives. Competition in this industry is vitally important, which is why today’s challenge against Google — the gatekeeper of the Internet — for violating antitrust laws is a monumental case both for the Department of Justice and for the American people,” said Attorney General William Barr. “Since my confirmation, I have prioritized the Department’s review of online market-leading platforms to ensure that our technology industries remain competitive. This lawsuit strikes at the heart of Google’s grip over the internet for millions of American consumers, advertisers, small businesses and entrepreneurs beholden to an unlawful monopolist.”

    “As with its historic antitrust actions against AT&T in 1974 and Microsoft in 1998, the Department is again enforcing the Sherman Act to restore the role of competition and open the door to the next wave of innovation—this time in vital digital markets,” said Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen.

    As one of the wealthiest companies on the planet with a market value of $1 trillion, Google is the monopoly gatekeeper to the internet for billions of users and countless advertisers worldwide. For years, Google has accounted for almost 90 percent of all search queries in the United States and has used anticompetitive tactics to maintain and extend its monopolies in search and search advertising.

    As alleged in the Complaint, Google has entered into a series of exclusionary agreements that collectively lock up the primary avenues through which users access search engines, and thus the internet, by requiring that Google be set as the preset default general search engine on billions of mobile devices and computers worldwide and, in many cases, prohibiting preinstallation of a competitor. In particular, the Complaint alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained monopolies in search and search advertising by:

    – Entering into exclusivity agreements that forbid preinstallation of any competing search service.
    – Entering into tying and other arrangements that force preinstallation of its search applications in prime locations on mobile devices and make them undeletable, regardless of consumer preference.
    – Entering into long-term agreements with Apple that require Google to be the default – and de facto exclusive – general search engine on Apple’s popular Safari browser and other Apple search tools.
    – Generally using monopoly profits to buy preferential treatment for its search engine on devices, web browsers, and other search access points, creating a continuous and self-reinforcing cycle of monopolization.

    These and other anticompetitive practices harm competition and consumers, reducing the ability of innovative new companies to develop, compete, and discipline Google’s behavior.

    The antitrust laws protect our free market economy and forbid monopolists from engaging in anticompetitive practices. They also empower the Department of Justice to bring cases like this one to remedy violations and restore competition, as it has done for over a century in notable cases involving monopolists over other critical industries undergirding the American economy like Standard Oil and the AT&T telephone monopoly. Decades ago the Department’s case against Microsoft recognized that the antitrust laws forbid anticompetitive agreements by high-technology monopolists to require preinstalled default status, to shut off distribution channels to rivals, and to make software undeletable. The Complaint alleges that Google is using similar agreements itself to maintain and extend its own dominance.

    The Complaint alleges that Google’s anticompetitive practices have had harmful effects on competition and consumers. Google has foreclosed any meaningful search competitor from gaining vital distribution and scale, eliminating competition for a majority of search queries in the United States. By restricting competition in search, Google’s conduct has harmed consumers by reducing the quality of search (including on dimensions such as privacy, data protection, and use of consumer data), lessening choice in search, and impeding innovation. By suppressing competition in advertising, Google has the power to charge advertisers more than it could in a competitive market and to reduce the quality of the services it provides them. Through filing the lawsuit, the Department seeks to stop Google’s anticompetitive conduct and restore competition for American consumers, advertisers, and all companies now reliant on the internet economy.

    Google is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google is owned by Alphabet Inc., a publicly traded company incorporated and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google today controls 91-92 percent of the search market.

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    Americas

    How did a bankrupt Spanish company count American votes?

    WashingtonAccording to unconfirmed reports, the server of a Spanish company, which was used for large parts of the US election count, was in Frankfurt am Main. According to the US Member of Congress Louie Gohmert, the server is said to have been confiscated after the election in a raid.

    Joe Biden stands ready to heighten global conflict

    WashingtonThe Pentagon, the State Department and an array of intelligence agencies have been sabotaging President Trump in order to wage endless wars. They are now boasting about it.

    US election glitch: Dominion voting machines and Democratic lobbyists

    WashingtonWhen Hillary Clinton brazenly declared before the 2020 US election that  "Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out," she must have had insight into what the Democrats had prepared for victory.

    ‘Real competitive struggle’ – Navalny either blind or biased in assessing US elections

    Undoubtedly, the attention of the whole world is riveted on the presidential election in the USA and the disarray which has followed. This being said, the US electoral process is traditionally an issue which is not only interesting in itself but also because of estimations and reactions from some third parties.

    The legitimacy of the US electoral system has suffered a huge blow

    WashingtonThe climate around the outcome of the US presidential election continues to deteriorate. Accusations of fraud by the Trump clan continue, due to the many irregularities in voting and counting.

    Evidence mounts of a stolen US election

    WashingtonAmericans are experiencing a well designed and successful coup against American democracy and accountable government and this is not a conspiracy theory, says Paul Craig Roberts. "It is a revolution against red state America."

    Another USPS worker steps forward amid widespread reports of voter fraud

    Erie, PennsylvaniaAnother United States postal worker from Erie County, Pennsylvania, has stepped forward on Thursday with evidence of fraudulently back-dated election ballots.

    US election: Whistleblower reveals USPS mail voter fraud in Michigan

    An US Postal Service insider told Project Veritas – a conservative media organization dedicated to secretly infiltrating leftist organisations to expose their underhanded dealings – that postal clerks in Michigan were told to fraudulently hand-postmark all new ballot envelopes for November 3.

    Bookmakers and traders are betting on a Trump victory

    WashingtonBookmakers and traders are betting on a reelection victory for the incumbent president. And Democratic Party supporters in Washington are getting ready for violence.

    Looters in Philadelphia target whites after police shooting

    PhiladelphiaTwo white reporters following the riots in Philadelphia, were chased down by black looters.

    Go to archive