Skip to Content

Cologne, Germany: Google stall at an event inviting participants to "skate and destroy". Photo: Rajeshwar Bachu
Washington

US Justice Department sues monopolist Google for violating antitrust laws

The Department of Justice — along with eleven state Attorneys General — filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the US District Court for the District of Columbia to stop Google from unlawfully maintaining monopolies through anticompetitive and exclusionary practices in the search and search advertising markets and to remedy the competitive harms.

Published: October 21, 2020, 7:30 am

    Read more

    The participating state Attorneys General offices represent Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, South Carolina, and Texas. They are all without exception, Republican.

    “Today, millions of Americans rely on the Internet and online platforms for their daily lives. Competition in this industry is vitally important, which is why today’s challenge against Google — the gatekeeper of the Internet — for violating antitrust laws is a monumental case both for the Department of Justice and for the American people,” said Attorney General William Barr. “Since my confirmation, I have prioritized the Department’s review of online market-leading platforms to ensure that our technology industries remain competitive. This lawsuit strikes at the heart of Google’s grip over the internet for millions of American consumers, advertisers, small businesses and entrepreneurs beholden to an unlawful monopolist.”

    “As with its historic antitrust actions against AT&T in 1974 and Microsoft in 1998, the Department is again enforcing the Sherman Act to restore the role of competition and open the door to the next wave of innovation—this time in vital digital markets,” said Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen.

    As one of the wealthiest companies on the planet with a market value of $1 trillion, Google is the monopoly gatekeeper to the internet for billions of users and countless advertisers worldwide. For years, Google has accounted for almost 90 percent of all search queries in the United States and has used anticompetitive tactics to maintain and extend its monopolies in search and search advertising.

    As alleged in the Complaint, Google has entered into a series of exclusionary agreements that collectively lock up the primary avenues through which users access search engines, and thus the internet, by requiring that Google be set as the preset default general search engine on billions of mobile devices and computers worldwide and, in many cases, prohibiting preinstallation of a competitor. In particular, the Complaint alleges that Google has unlawfully maintained monopolies in search and search advertising by:

    – Entering into exclusivity agreements that forbid preinstallation of any competing search service.
    – Entering into tying and other arrangements that force preinstallation of its search applications in prime locations on mobile devices and make them undeletable, regardless of consumer preference.
    – Entering into long-term agreements with Apple that require Google to be the default – and de facto exclusive – general search engine on Apple’s popular Safari browser and other Apple search tools.
    – Generally using monopoly profits to buy preferential treatment for its search engine on devices, web browsers, and other search access points, creating a continuous and self-reinforcing cycle of monopolization.

    These and other anticompetitive practices harm competition and consumers, reducing the ability of innovative new companies to develop, compete, and discipline Google’s behavior.

    The antitrust laws protect our free market economy and forbid monopolists from engaging in anticompetitive practices. They also empower the Department of Justice to bring cases like this one to remedy violations and restore competition, as it has done for over a century in notable cases involving monopolists over other critical industries undergirding the American economy like Standard Oil and the AT&T telephone monopoly. Decades ago the Department’s case against Microsoft recognized that the antitrust laws forbid anticompetitive agreements by high-technology monopolists to require preinstalled default status, to shut off distribution channels to rivals, and to make software undeletable. The Complaint alleges that Google is using similar agreements itself to maintain and extend its own dominance.

    The Complaint alleges that Google’s anticompetitive practices have had harmful effects on competition and consumers. Google has foreclosed any meaningful search competitor from gaining vital distribution and scale, eliminating competition for a majority of search queries in the United States. By restricting competition in search, Google’s conduct has harmed consumers by reducing the quality of search (including on dimensions such as privacy, data protection, and use of consumer data), lessening choice in search, and impeding innovation. By suppressing competition in advertising, Google has the power to charge advertisers more than it could in a competitive market and to reduce the quality of the services it provides them. Through filing the lawsuit, the Department seeks to stop Google’s anticompetitive conduct and restore competition for American consumers, advertisers, and all companies now reliant on the internet economy.

    Google is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google is owned by Alphabet Inc., a publicly traded company incorporated and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google today controls 91-92 percent of the search market.

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    Americas

    United States: White farmers deprived of aid to reduce their debt

    WashingtonPresident Joe Biden's federal aid program only offers “socially disadvantaged” farm owners who are victims of “historic discrimination” hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    Impeachment: Donald Trump acquitted in the Senate

    WashingtonThe United States Senate acquitted former President Donald Trump of impeachment charges. Fifty-seven senators voted to convict, while forty-three voted to acquit, but conviction would have required a two-thirds majority, or sixty-seven votes.

    Trump will never be allowed to return to Twitter even if re-elected president

    WashingtonMore than a month after the suspension of Donald Trump's Twitter account, immediately after the demonstration at the Capitol by his supporters, one of the leaders of the blue bird social network confirmed the absolutely final nature of this suspension.

    ‘A global surveillance state is emerging before our eyes’

    BerlinOn January 28, the AfD parliamentary group delivered a speech in the Bundestag under the title “Big Tech and freedom of expression on the Internet” following Donald Trump's Twitter ban. The deputy group leader of the AfD, Beatrix von Storch, warned of the "globalist left in alliance with Big Tech".

    Part three of damning ‘Navarro Report’ on US election fraud published

    WashingtonHarvard economist Peter Navarro (r.) has published the third part of his report on alleged electoral fraud in the US, just in time for the inauguration of the "elected" President Joe Biden on Wednesday.

    Will the Signal messaging app defy Tech Giant censorship?

    Available on Android and iOS, the application Signal is popular for being particularly secure, and for having no connection with Facebook, the owner of WhatsApp.

    Two major banks to close Donald Trump’s accounts

    WashingtonIn addition to being banned from every major social media platform and payment processor, the largest German bank, the most important creditor of the Trump Organization, has decided to no longer do business with the outgoing president or his companies.

    Twitter loses $5 billion in market value after Trump ban

    Washington, DCWhen the markets opened this week, the two most anti-Trump social networks posted a marked decline. Twitter lost a massive $5 billion in market value after the company decided to permanently ban President Donald Trump from the platform.

    Arrest warrant issued for Donald Trump

    US President Donald Trump has been a wanted man with an arrest warrant dated January 7, 2021. Interpol has received a corresponding search request. However, this arrest warrant was not issued by a US court.

    Leftist mayor calls National Guard to Washington – unarmed protester shot dead

    Washington, DCAn unarmed pro-Trump protester was shot dead by Capitol police on Wednesday. On the eve of the election of the US President in Congress on January 6, Washington DC saw a mega-demonstration by Trump supporters.

    Go to archive