German Analysis of Weapon Transfers to Ukraine Makes Sober Reading

Leopard 2 and Pzh-2000 almost impossible to maintain in the field

Published: April 15, 2025, 6:08 pm

    The German news outlet Spiegel, citing a presentation given by the deputy military attaché of Berlin’s embassy in Kyiv to an audience at the Bundeswehr’s non-commissioned officer school in Delitzsch, Saxony in January, reported that he had given an unvarnished assessment of the performance of German weapons in combat in Ukraine.

    The good, the bad, and the indifferent

    The attaché’s words, based on feedback received from Ukrainian troops, have proved to be sober reading for both Germany’s military and its arms manufacturers. He described in clear terms what was good, bad and indifferent about the German weapons systems gifted to Kyiv.

    Ironically the weapons system that was commented on most favorably was the Gepard self-propelled anti-aircraft cannon system, that the Bundeswehr had written off and was in the process of decommissioning – many of the weapons provided to Ukraine were taken out of mothballs or purchased from third party users. It was assessed as the “most popular, most efficient, and most reliable weapon system” with Ukraine users.

    The IRIS-T air defense system was considered highly effective, but the cost of its missiles was too high, and they were not available in sufficient quantities to make a huge contribution to Ukraine’s defenses. Similarly, while the US Patriot systems provided by Germany were excellent, the MAN trucks on which Berlin’s versions were mounted were “too old “and spare parts were impossible to obtain meaning the systems were rarely available for combat.

    The older Leopard 1A5 main battle tank and its main armament was extremely reliable but its “weak armor” made it unsuitable for anything other than as a defensive weapon firing from entrenched positions except for those that Ukraine was able to “up-armor” by fitting Ukrainian designed explosive reactive armor (ERA) and “cope cages.”

    Meanwhile the newer German Leopard 2A6s, while superior to their predecessor, proved almost impossible to maintain in the field as did the Pzh-2000 self-propelled howitzer which Ukrainian gunners described as “outstanding” but technically so “vulnerable” and difficult to maintain that they questioned its suitability for combat.

    These inherent maintenance issues were exacerbated, according to Ukrainian feedback, by the rapid rate of training on equipment prior to it being deployed which gave only rudimentary preparation for in-the-field maintenance along with inadequate supplies of frontline infrastructure.

    Ukraine has, therefore, had to rely on establishing centralized repair hubs often positioned a long way back from the combat zones resulting in unacceptable delays in getting the equipment back into the field.

    Ukrainians also expressed problems with the five Mars II rocket launchers, supposedly an improved version of the US M270 system, which they said could have been a “game changer” but were unfortunately not compatible with US supplied cluster munitions – the German system had been modified to only allow missiles fitted with unitary warheads to be fired after Germany joined the cluster munition ban in 2010.

    Similarly, the fire control systems fitted to German howitzers had to be reprogrammed to allow “non-German” ammunition to be accurately used with them.

    A spokesperson for the German Ministry of Defense declined to comment on the news site’s report other than to say Berlin is in constant communication with the Ukrainian authorities regarding all delivered weapons systems, repair options, spare parts supply, and ammunition supply.

    Sara Nanni, the security policy spokesperson for Germany’s Green Party said: “We must enter into close, cooperative dialogue with Ukraine and look at precisely these deficiencies and take them into account for future procurement.”

    Summarizing its report, Spiegel commented that “Hardly any large German equipment [provided to Ukraine] was fully suitable for war.”

    Source: Kyiv Post

    Steve Brown

    editor@freewestmedia.com

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    No comments.

    By submitting a comment you grant Free West Media a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate and irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin’s discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.

    How the Creation of the ‘New Antisemitism’ Was Used to Shield Israel and Attack the Left

    Challenges to Zionism in the late 1960s and 1970s sparked an effort to redefine antisemitism in a way to make it a useful tool of counterinsurgency against international solidarity for Palestine

    mRNA COVID Jabs Often Cause Long-Term Thyroid Damage, a Big New Study Shows

    Hypothyroidism robs you of energy and leaves you more susceptible to gaining weight

    Ukraine Braces for Russia’s Summer Offensive

    An interesting realist analysis from the pro-NATO camp

    The Class Wars Are More Complicated Than Ever but No Less Intense

    Prostate Cancer Has a Right to Exist. Biden’s Tumor Has a Right to Defend Itself

    You're supposed to dehumanize mass-murder victims but have empathy for the perpetrator, how so?

    De-BREXIT: EU Sympathizer Starmer Surrenders Britain to Brussels

    UK signs up to conform to endless EU regulations once more but this time without representation in Strasbourg

    Where the Heck Is the ‘Pull-Forward Effect’? Western Mortality Remains Higher Than Pre-COVID

    Yet non-vaccinated Bulgaria now enjoys fewer deaths than before 2020

    Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin and Laura Loomer Warn of Foreign Influence… From Qatar

    America First indeed!

    The WHO Can Not Be Saved and Has Never Been Less Needed

    It's not 1948 anymore. The more obsolete it has become, the more power it has amassed

    Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis Is Very Strange, and a Medical Cover-up Is the Least of It

    Go to archive