Despite successful strikes in Russia’s rear and significant enemy personnel losses, Russian forces continue to advance. Amid growing concerns over a potential summer offensive, criticism is mounting against Ukraine’s Commander-in-Chief, Oleksandr Syrskyi. In a recently published article, Ukrainska Pravda spoke with several unnamed sources within the Ministry of Defense about Syrskyi’s leadership and his strained relationship with the commander of the Ground Forces, Mykhailo Drapatyi.
Syrskyi wants to be in control of everything
“Instead of planning strategic and operational actions, Syrskyi is engaged in writing combat orders for restoring positions at the squad level. The General Staff, in violation of logic, common sense, and regulatory documents, sends coordinates specifying where to place a squad’s position. Determining a squad’s position is a task for a platoon commander at most. Moreover, these orders come with a clarification: if you don’t place the position there, you will face criminal liability,” one well-informed source in the Defense Forces told Ukrainska Pravda.
According to sources close to Ukrainska Pravda, the Ministry of Defense proposed that Syrskyi withdraw from unfavorable positions near Toretsk and reestablish defensive lines closer to Kostiantynivka. The move was intended to prevent potential encirclement and free up much-needed forces for other areas. Syrskyi, however, declined the proposal.
“Because how can we possibly leave something behind? How can we — I emphasize — be forced to abandon a settlement? And the fact that the front line could actually become shorter due to the terrain features, such as a water obstacle like a reservoir, doesn’t interest anyone,” one well-informed source in the Defense Forces told Ukrainska Pravda.
Drapatyi had only limited powers
Between Syrskyi and Drapatyi, the working relationship is cold. The Commander-in-Chief often considers his own management decisions to be the best and sidelines Drapatyi from part of his authority.
Some of UP sources suggest that there is a difference in views between them regarding the future actions of the Defense Forces: Syrskyi believes that the Ukrainian army should go on the offensive, while Drapatyi thinks there aren’t enough resources for offensive operations and that it’s better to take up defensive positions. Others are convinced that Syrskyi, or the President’s Office, fears competition from Drapatyi, as he has a reputation among the troops as a humane and strong commander.
“When Syrskyi was the commander of the ‘Khortytsia’ group, he had significantly more authority than Drapatyi does now. He was delegated the power to appoint any official in the Ground Forces; he alone decided where reinforcements would go, where reserves would be sent. Meanwhile, Drapatyi is working with minimal resources. Syrskyi still decides where 10, 20, 100 people go after finishing at the training center, who joins which corps — even though this should be handled by the Ground Forces. He is deliberately and consciously tying Drapatyi’s hands.” one of the previously mentioned sources shared to UP.
Mykhailo Drapatyi submitted his resignation over the tragedy at the 239th Training Range Center, where a Russian strike killed soldiers from a training battalion on June 1, 2025. His resignation latter has not yet been accepted by Syrskyi.
Source: Military Land
So, to sum up: General Drapatyi submitted his resignation as Commander of the Ukrainian Ground Forces following a Russian strike on a training camp.
After meeting with Zelensky, he posted a message saying he was “staying in the fight,” which many interpreted to mean Zelensky —…
— Illia Ponomarenko 🇺🇦 (@IAPonomarenko) June 3, 2025
One comment
The AFU was formed in 2014 and has no ‘institutional’ knowledge. NATO, which has ‘institutional’ knowledge, depends on a lot more resources than the AFU has to draw on so their tactics don’t work in the Ukraine. Neither Syrskyi and Drapatyi had previous combat experience. Now, with very unwilling conscripts, most seasoned soldiers are dead or maimed he is playing at games. No doubt their loyalty to Azov has a lot to do with their promotion which makes them political. Do they feel bad for whoring out to the Globalists as their proxy against a far-superior Russian Army whose resources are endless; they did all become more wealthy. The West has ‘shot its wad’ and has no more to give yet these political die-hards are still playing with men’s lives. The Ukraine will not be on the right side of history when all is said and done.
By submitting a comment you grant Free West Media a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate and irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin’s discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.