Ukraine’s Attack on Russian Strategic Forces Will Harden’s Putin Resolve to Subdue It

He believes he can fight indefinitely and still has room for escalation

Published: June 5, 2025, 10:11 pm

    Tatiana Stanovaya is a pro-Western analyst with Carnegie Center.

    Many in Western audiences view Ukraine’s attacks on Russian strategic forces as a move that strengthens Kyiv’s negotiating position. These strikes demonstrate to Russia that Ukraine has capabilities previously thought unimaginable, and signal to the West that Ukraine retains “cards” with which to continue the fight. The idea is that the Kremlin—as a collective decision-making entity—will gradually be compelled to concede.

    However, in my assessment, the effect will likely be the opposite. Based on years—now decades—of observing Putin’s decision-making, I believe such attacks will only reinforce his determination to dismantle the Ukrainian state in its current form. He will respond by becoming more hardline and less compliant. The perception that Ukraine’s geopolitical orientation poses a long-term existential threat will harden, and his resolve to make it “friendly” will intensify, regardless of the cost.

    The West’s greatest weakness in facing a desperate and confrontational Russia lies in its credibility. The Russian leadership sees no plausible way in which the West can “win” the war. Weapons deliveries, authorisation for long-range strikes, completely unrealistic discussions of troop deployments (which, thankfully, have subsided), and funding packages do not convince Moscow that the West can reverse the situation on the battlefield. It will not change Putin’s calculus, incite a palace coup, or spark a popular revolution. The current policies reinforce anti-Western, anti-Ukrainian, and pro-state sentiment in Russia.

    To be clear, I am not arguing that the West should withdraw its support for Ukraine, nor that Ukraine should surrender. Rather, as a long-time Russian political analyst, I aim to explain the current trajectory: Putin’s Russia is now even more prepared to fight indefinitely, and increasingly convinced that it is winning and possesses the necessary resources to continue not only through 2025 but well into 2026 and beyond. Moreover, there remains considerable scope for further radicalisation and escalation. Striking at Russia’s vulnerable points without sufficient military agency to defend and secure Ukraine is a course of action that may carry consequences many currently underestimate.

    Source: X


    Putin on collapsed bridges:

    Tatiana Stanovaya

    editor@freewestmedia.com

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    No comments.

    By submitting a comment you grant Free West Media a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate and irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin’s discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.

    US Should Not Become a Pawn in Israel’s New War

    A pawn in Netanyahu's increasingly megalomaniacal moves to prolong his political life

    White House Says Tactical Nuclear Weapon vs Fordow Is Possible

    Psychological warfare, or?

    Trump’s False Binary of Deal or War Ignored a Better, Third Option

    The US could have just continued to live with a near-nuclear Iran as it had for many, many years

    Israel Is Running Low on Air Defense Interceptors, Rationing Has Started

    A night of missile defense burns through roughly $285 million — ultimately covered by Uncle Sam

    Trump Says Will Decide Whether to Attack Iran in Two Weeks, but Tells Netanyahu to “Keep Going”

    WSJ reported Trump has approved the attack plan but is waiting to give the final order

    Trump Delayed Iran Strikes Over Doubt About ‘Bunker Buster’ Bomb

    Netanyahu assures him the GBU-57 will be good enough. He's not convinced taking out access tunnels is enough to matter

    Zionism Is Not an American Principle

    Yet its stranglehold on DC has never been greater

    Strikes on Iran Ease Pressure on Israel to End Starvation in Gaza

    Europeans had been growing uneasy with their role in enabling the Gaza horrors. Now they're rooting for IDF vs Tehran

    Israel Says Police Actively Hunting Down Anyone Filming Missile Strike Locations

    War on footage of missiles getting through

    Super Influential, Pro-Israel General Kurilla Is the Major Force Behind the Push to Attack Iran

    Heads CENTCOM but wields influence far in excess of his lowly post

    Go to archive