White House Quietly Pressures Senate to Water Down Russia Sanctions

Not aboard the Lindsey Graham neocon loony train

Published: June 7, 2025, 8:13 pm

    Source: The Wall Street Journal

    The Trump administration is trying to get Sen. Lindsey Graham (R, S.C.) to significantly weaken his Russia-sanctions bill while the White House seeks to patch up its relationship with Moscow instead of punishing it for the continued invasion of Ukraine. A key provision in the legislation, backed by more than 80 senators, is the imposition of sanctions on key Russian officials and sectors, as well as penalties for countries that do business with Moscow. That, President Trump fears, could harm his goal of reviving relations between the U.S. and Russia even as he seeks to end the war in Ukraine.

    Over the past weeks, White House and other administration officials have quietly contacted Graham’s office, urging him to water down his bill, namely by inserting waivers that would allow Trump to choose who or what gets sanctioned, congressional aides said. Another way to weaken the legislation would be to turn the word “shall” into “may” wherever it appears in the bill’s text, removing the mandatory nature of the prescribed reprimands, congressional aides said.

    Any administration asks for changes to high-profile bills, often seeking language that gives the president more authority to make decisions instead of having foreign-policy actions thrust upon them. But removing the mandatory nature of the sanctions would render Graham’s bill toothless, the staffers said, noting that Trump already has the ability to impose sanctions at will.

    Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D., Conn.), the lead Democratic co-sponsor on Graham’s bill, confirmed the private negotiations with the White House but declined to comment on their substance. “We’re moving ahead and the White House is included in our conversations,” he said.

    A White House official said the Constitution “vests the president with the authority to conduct diplomacy with foreign nations. Any sanction package must provide complete flexibility for the president to continue to pursue his desired foreign policy.”

    Graham has publicly said he plans to make at least some changes to the bill, including by adding language that would enable carve-outs for countries that are providing military or economic assistance to Ukraine. Such a provision aims to protect Ukraine’s European allies from 500% tariffs the bill would impose on imported goods from any country that purchases Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products.

    But the staunch Trump ally hasn’t publicly endorsed the changes the Trump administration has privately pushed him to make.

    “I feel good about it. We’re working with the White House and our Democratic colleagues and the House,” Graham said on Thursday, adding that the measure was “still moving forward.” He declined to comment further.

    Trump, speaking in the Oval Office on Thursday, told reporters that the bill shouldn’t move forward without his express approval.

    “They’ll be guided by me. That’s how it’s supposed to be,” Trump said, sitting alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, a strong supporter of Ukraine. “They’re waiting for me to decide on what to do,” he continued, calling the Graham-led measure a “harsh bill.”

    The Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 currently has 82 co-sponsors in the Senate from both sides of the aisle-more than enough support to overcome a presidential veto. A companion measure, sponsored by Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R., Pa.) has been introduced in the House and now has 60 supporters, evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats.

    Graham has previously expressed confidence that the bill has broad enough support for a successful discharge petition-a parliamentary maneuver that allows rank-and-file members to circumvent House leadership and force a vote on the floor by collecting 218 signatures, a simple majority.

    But a petition might not be necessary. “There’s many members of Congress that want us to sanction Russia as strongly as we can,” House Speaker Mike Johnson (R., La.) said. “And I’m an advocate of that.”

    Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R., S.D.), also a co-sponsor of Graham’s bill, said this week there is “a high level of interest” in the Senate, on both sides of the aisle, on moving on the sanctions. “They’re still hopeful they’ll be able to strike some sort of a deal,” Thune said.

    U.S. support for Ukraine has been a rare point of agreement among most Republicans and Democrats in Congress. They have repeatedly expressed a desire to stand with Ukraine against Russia regardless of time or cost, with many lawmakers making the tough trek to Kyiv to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and see the damage to the capital city. But there has been no legislative movement to continue supporting Ukraine’s military with weapons or financial aid.

    Lindsay Wise

    editor@freewestmedia.com

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    No comments.

    By submitting a comment you grant Free West Media a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate and irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin’s discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.

    US Should Not Become a Pawn in Israel’s New War

    A pawn in Netanyahu's increasingly megalomaniacal moves to prolong his political life

    White House Says Tactical Nuclear Weapon vs Fordow Is Possible

    Psychological warfare, or?

    Trump’s False Binary of Deal or War Ignored a Better, Third Option

    The US could have just continued to live with a near-nuclear Iran as it had for many, many years

    Israel Is Running Low on Air Defense Interceptors, Rationing Has Started

    A night of missile defense burns through roughly $285 million — ultimately covered by Uncle Sam

    Trump Says Will Decide Whether to Attack Iran in Two Weeks, but Tells Netanyahu to “Keep Going”

    WSJ reported Trump has approved the attack plan but is waiting to give the final order

    Trump Delayed Iran Strikes Over Doubt About ‘Bunker Buster’ Bomb

    Netanyahu assures him the GBU-57 will be good enough. He's not convinced taking out access tunnels is enough to matter

    Zionism Is Not an American Principle

    Yet its stranglehold on DC has never been greater

    Strikes on Iran Ease Pressure on Israel to End Starvation in Gaza

    Europeans had been growing uneasy with their role in enabling the Gaza horrors. Now they're rooting for IDF vs Tehran

    Israel Says Police Actively Hunting Down Anyone Filming Missile Strike Locations

    War on footage of missiles getting through

    Super Influential, Pro-Israel General Kurilla Is the Major Force Behind the Push to Attack Iran

    Heads CENTCOM but wields influence far in excess of his lowly post

    Go to archive