Ukrainians with a captured Russian artillery piece. Source: RFE/RL

The Kupyansk-Izyum offensive: The defeat that forced Putin to mobilize

At the start of the Special Military Operation in Ukraine, Russians were outnumbered. But the balance of forces has changed with large numbers of Russian troops being amassed on the frontline.

Published: January 3, 2023, 9:12 am

    The Russian military sustained a severe loss in September in the Kharkov region, allowing Ukrainians to capture vast swaths of strategic territory in a lightning offensive resulting in at light loses. Territory that Russia had previously heavily bled for in protracted battles to win. In a rushed ad-hoc general retreat Russia even left behind considerable quantities of usable equipment.

    It will become clear the defeat – which was real – was much less the result of any incompetence on the part of the Russian soldier or even general, and much more the result of the objectively impossible situation the Russian political leadership had placed the military in, expecting it to fight the largest land war in Europe since WW2 without providing it with the manpower for the job.

    On September 6 the Ukrainians struck the Russian line of control around Balakleya in the Kharkov region headed east. Russian “lines” here consisted of outposts and tripwire forces. A mix of Russian Rosgvardia police, Lugansk mobiki, and some Russian regulars, particularly artillery and armor as a small “mobile reserve”.

    Against this colorful mix, the Ukrainians had amassed half a dozen full brigades, several of them mechanized. The Ukrainians had amassed easily five times the forces the Russians had here. Moreover, the Ukrainians were perfectly contended to bypass the defenders. To pour into any gaps, and head into Russian depth while leaving the bypassed defenders to be dealt with by follow-on echelons.

    The Ukrainian advance was swift. By nightfall of September 7, their vanguard was halfway to the Russian logistical hub of Kupyansk. On the next day, their scouts dipped their toes in the Oskil river just south of the city.

    The Russians side initially advertised that they would quickly pour in reinforcements and repel the attack. Russian state TV carried footage of supposedly massive reinforcements arriving by land and and by air.

    But quickly the exact opposite decision was made. A general Russian withdrawal was ordered and on the 9th the Ukrainians entered Kupyansk unopposed. In three days the Ukrainians had covered 60 kilometers. A pace of advance that Russia had last demonstrated in March.

    https://twitter.com/200_zoka/status/1568513828379586561

    Not just Kupyansk. To the south the Russians were also already withdrawing well ahead of the Ukrainians from Izyum, which now lay dangerously exposed. And from the border buffer near Kharkov to the north. Along 300 kilometers of the front, the Russians were falling back behind either the Oskil or the Russian border. A retreat between 20 and 60 km, depending on the sector.

    The reason the Russians opted to withdraw rather than to fight, as they first claimed they would, is that in reality they had very few reserves and these were far away. Once the Ukrainians had been allowed to mass against weak and second-tier Russian forces the game had already been lost.

    But lost now were also Izyum and Kupyansk. Izyum was the key city where the Russian army had crossed the Severskiy Donets river and had established a springboard for an advance on Slavyansk and Kramatorsk. Kupyansk meanwhile was the key railway hub to keep Izyum and northern Lugansk supplied.

    Kupyansk on the railway map. Source: Twitter

    To capture Izyum and expand its bridgehead had taken the Russians months of bloody battles. Now it was lost in the blink of an eye. And with it the springboard for a march on the last two remaining cities in the Donetsk region in Ukrainian hands from the easier and superior northern direction.

    In a matter of days between September 6th and 12th, the Ukrainians captured nearly 10,000 square kilometers. Not counting Russia’s own advances of February-March the last time this kind of blitzkrieg happened in Europe was in 1995 in Croatia’s Operation Storm. But where the Croatian army achieved this feat against a rebel Serb statelet, the Ukrainians did it against what had been considered the world’s second or third military.

    Territory captured/lost. Source: Twitter

    For the amount of territory that traded hands the personnel losses on both sides had been light. In the hundreds of dead rather than thousands. The Russian decision to withdraw, rather than to defend, meant that there was little fighting after the first three days. But the equipment losses on the Russian side were significant. So bad that Russia’s top military portal thundered against “Russian Lend-Lease” and called on the “supreme commander” to intervene.

    What made the equipment losses worse is that by and large the gear had been captured rather than destroyed in battle. This was no orderly, centrally-orchestrated, phased withdrawal. What appears to have happened is that when the Russian command realized by how much the Ukrainians outnumbered them, and with what ease they were driving into the Russian depth, an order went out to each individual unit beyond the Oskil to turn on its heels and get behind the river as soon as possible on its own.

    Anything else would have risked Russian forces becoming cut off and encircled. But with each unit now hastily withdrawing by itself a lot of heavy equipment that would have gotten in the way was left behind. Particularly any vehicles in a poor state of repair, many of them in repair yards.

    Captured Lugansk mobiks. Source: Rusovok.ru

    So in the final tally of the Kupyansk-Izyum Offensive the Russians lost nearly 10 000 sq km, including strategic areas they had bled for heavily. They had also failed to make the enemy pay a high price for the gains and to successfully trade space for time and enemy attrition. On top of that, they — conservatively speaking — lost 100 armored vehicles that will sooner or later be turned against them. On the other hand, they did succeed in preserving the great majority of their personnel.

    NATO-backed Ukrainians meanwhile captured strategic ground that averts danger to Slavyansk and Kramatorsk. But more than that, in their first large-scale offensive they showed that they are perfectly capable of carrying out competent combined-arms offensives of their own when the circumstances allow them. (There had been a previous Ukrainian offensive against the Kharkov buffer in May which was also successful but that was on a much smaller scale.)

    https://twitter.com/Syricide/status/1568541737903087619

    A particular feat was the way in which the Ukrainians were able to concentrate and layer their Soviet-era air defenses in a way that prevented the Russian air force from exerting its influence on the battle. You might have thought that Russian air assets could make moving large mechanized forces in the open during the day impossible for Ukraine but nothing like that transpired.

    What was the cause of such a Russian defeat? For one the Russian command was working under the condition of extreme manpower scarcity compared to the Ukrainians. The Russian side was still persecuting the war only with as many men as they had brought in originally, whereas the Ukrainians had kept calling up more and more men and expanding their forces since the start of war 7 months ago.

    In peacetime, Russia has over 900 000 men in the armed forces. But a lot of that falls on services like navy, air force, and strategic missile forces. The various land combat arms (ground army, airborne, naval infantry, and special forces) together have under 400 000 men in uniform. At the start of the war however, Putin forbade the military from deploying conscripts performing their mandatory 1-year national service. This left a pool of just 250 000 officers and kontraktniki to shoulder the brunt of Russia’s war effort on the land.

    On the other side, the estimates for the size of Ukrainian armed forces by September reach as high as 700 000. (I would probably put them lower at some 500 000.) Naturally, a force of 250 000 couldn’t sustain a deployment to the battlefield anywhere near the size of what could be sustained by a total force of 500 000 or 700 000.

    Aside from this general manpower superiority, the further secret to Ukrainians’ success lay in the fact that they amassed precisely against a sector of the front that the Russians had dangerously weakened.

    Some of the tanks advertised as captured in Izyum by the Ukrainians. Source: Военное обозрение/Voennoe Obozrenie/Military Review

    Izyum had once been home to a large concentration of Russian troops attempting to force their way to Slavyansk. But as growing Ukrainian numbers forced the Russians to abandon that ambition and to transition to defense numerous Russian regular units were transferred to frontlines in the south, particularly to Kherson. Their Kharkov right flank became a sideshow for the Russians which they hoped to hold with the most minimal numbers possible. Ukrainians had other ideas and amassed a credible assault force against it even as they amassed another such force against Kherson.

    Thus while overall the Ukrainian advantage of men in the theater was under 2:1 on this neglected Russian flank it might have been greater than 3:1, with overmatch on the point of the Kupyansk spearhead even 8:1. So it would be incorrect to say that it was just a matter of overall numbers — skillfull Ukrainian positioning also played a role.

    The strangest thing about this is that this Ukrainian positioning wasn’t entirely secret. For weeks leading up to offensive Russian Telegram channels were noticing heightened Ukrainian activity that suggested a build-up opposite of Kupyansk yet the Russian positions continued to be weakened. So the intelligence was there, it is just that the Russian command didn’t react to it.

    This caused a great deal of anger in the Russian military blogosphere when the battle concluded so unfavorably for the Russian side, but I feel that the Russian command may not have had a choice. As said, the Ukrainians were also amassing against Kherson. Indeed the Ukrainian attempt against Kherson started more than a week before the Kupyansk operation kicked off.

    The Russian command may have felt it simply didn’t have the forces to properly reinforce both its right flank in the Kharkov region and its left flank across the Dnieper around Kherson. I think that faced with an impossible choice it opted to prioritize Kherson and hope that the Kharkov buildup was a feint, or overblown, or that its rag-tag forces there could hold. But why would it prioritize Kherson in this manner?

    I think they would do that because their right-flank at least had depth. Its Kherson flank was in a much more precarious position owing to its different geography. If the worst came to worst in Kupyansk at least the forces there could be safely pulled back. But if the enemy ever managed just a 30-kilometer march in Kherson the Russian retreat would be cut off against the Dniester. While just a 10-km advance would put Ukrainian guns in range of Russian-held bridges.

    There was no buffer in Kherson, no margin for error. The stakes in Kherson were simply higher. If Kherson was not strengthened to where the Ukrainians could not even get a good start, eventually losing tens of thousands to an enemy encirclement was a possible outcome. The worst-case scenario for Kherson was worse and more realistic than the worst-case scenario for Kupyansk.

    With the benefit of hindsight, we can say that the Russian command didn’t do an optimal job of shifting around forces. But we must understand that they were working under the incredible strain of not having enough troops to begin with, and then having the Kherson problem hanging over their heads to boot.

    Ironically the debacle in the Kupyansk-Izyum offensive ended up working in the Russian military’s favor. On September 12th the Ukrainians reached the border opposite of the Russian city of Belgorod. On September 21st Vladimir Putin declared the partial mobilization of 300 000 citizens into the ranks.

    For 7 months after starting the war Putin watched as the Ukrainians generated more and more forces through successive waves of mobilization while doing nothing himself. He did not even move to make the 250 000 conscripts already in the military (150 000 in the land combat arms) deployable.

    But as Kharkov-Izyum demonstrated just how unfavorable the correlation of forces had grown for the Russian side, Putin was finally forced to end his indecision.

    But as it turned out, Russia was not yet done paying the price of Putin having waited so long. It would take time for the 300 000 mobiki to be trained and make their presence felt in the theater. Before that would happen Russia would suffer two more losses in Liman and Kherson.

    Izyum had once been home to a large concentration of Russian troops attempting to force their way to Slavyansk. But as growing Ukrainian numbers forced the Russians to abandon that ambition and to transition to defense numerous Russian regular units were transferred to frontlines in the south, particularly to Kherson. Their Kharkov right flank became a sideshow for the Russians which they hoped to hold with the most minimal numbers possible. Ukrainians had other ideas and amassed a credible assault force against it even as they amassed another such force against Kherson.

    Thus while overall the Ukrainian advantage of men in the theater was under 2:1 on this neglected Russian flank it might have been greater than 3:1, with overmatch on the point of the Kupyansk spearhead even 8:1. So it would be incorrect to say that it was just a matter of overall numbers — skillful Ukrainian positioning also played a role.

    Izyum and Liman (red) were vantage points on to Slavyansk and Kramatorsk (blue) but are now lost. Source: Livemap.ua

    The strangest thing about this is that this Ukrainian positioning wasn’t entirely secret. For weeks leading up to offensive Russian Telegram channels were noticing heightened Ukrainian activity that suggested a build-up opposite of Kupyansk yet the Russian positions continued to be weakened. So the intelligence was there, it is just that the Russian command didn’t react to it.

    This caused a great deal of anger in the Russian military blogosphere when the battle concluded so unfavorably for the Russian side, but I feel that the Russian command may not have had a choice. As said, the Ukrainians were also amassing against Kherson. Indeed the Ukrainian attempt against Kherson started more than a week before the Kupyansk operation kicked off.

    The Russian command may have felt it simply didn’t have the forces to properly reinforce both its right flank in the Kharkov region and its left flank across the Dnieper around Kherson. I think that faced with an impossible choice it opted to prioritize Kherson and hope that the Kharkov buildup was a feint, or overblown, or that its rag-tag forces there could hold. But why would it prioritize Kherson in this manner?

    I think they would do that because their right-flank at least had depth. Its Kherson flank was in a much more precarious position owing to its different geography. If the worst came to worst in Kupyansk at least the forces there could be safely pulled back. But if the enemy ever managed just a 30-kilometer march in Kherson the Russian retreat would be cut off against the Dniester. While just a 10-km advance would put Ukrainian guns in range of Russian-held bridges.

    There was no buffer in Kherson, no margin for error. The stakes in Kherson were simply higher. If Kherson was not strengthened to where the Ukrainians could not even get a good start, eventually losing tens of thousands to an enemy encirclement was a possible outcome. The worst-case scenario for Kherson was worse and more realistic than the worst-case scenario for Kupyansk.

    The Russian Kherson bridgehead across the Dnieper. Source: Militaryland.net

     

    Swedish weekly Nya Tider’s Foreign Editor Christer Ericsson highly recommends anti-empire.com for Russia-Ukraine news and analysis from the realist, questioning perspective.

    With the benefit of hindsight, we can say that the Russian command didn’t do an optimal job of shifting around forces. But we must understand that they were working under the incredible strain of not having enough troops to begin with, and then having the Kherson problem hanging over their heads to boot.

    Ironically the debacle in the Kupyansk-Izyum offensive ended up working in the Russian military’s favor. On September 12th the Ukrainians reached the border opposite of the Russian city of Belgorod. On September 21st Vladimir Putin declared the partial mobilization of 300 000 citizens into the ranks.

    For 7 months after starting the war, Putin watched as the Ukrainians generated more and more forces through successive waves of mobilization while doing nothing himself. He did not even move to make the 250 000 conscripts already in the military (150 000 in the land combat arms) deployable.

    But as Kharkov-Izyum demonstrated just how unfavorable the correlation of forces had grown for the Russian side, Putin was finally forced to end his indecision.

    But as it turned out, Russia was not yet done paying the price of Putin having waited so long. It would take time for the 300 000 mobiki to be trained and make their presence felt in the theater. Before that would happen Russia would suffer two more losses in Liman and Kherson.

    https://twitter.com/200_zoka/status/1568575201754882048

     

    Marko Marjanović is a commentator, analyst and the publisher of the news site Anti-Empire. Marjanović was an editor at Russia Insider 2014-2019. He has been writing on geopolitics and Eastern Europe since 2009. 

    Marko Marjanovic

    opinion@freewestmedia.com

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    No comments.

    By submitting a comment you grant Free West Media a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Inappropriate and irrelevant comments will be removed at an admin’s discretion. Your email is used for verification purposes only, it will never be shared.

    Europe

    New App Helps Locate Sweden’s Historic Runestones

    A new app called Swedish Runestones will help locate historical gems.

    Swedish military wants to remilitarize the Åland Islands

    The demilitarized autonomy has previously been known as 'the islands of peace.

    DESTRUCTIVE HAILSTORMS will become more frequent and violent with increasingly larger hail, predicted solar researcher Valentina Zharkova back in 2019 when she stated that it's one of many signs of an impending Grand Solar Minimum. This is exactly what we have witnessed this year in both Europe and the world. Here is the German town of Benediktbeuern in Bavaria after a hailstorm on August 26th. Almost all rooftops and cars were damaged. The centuries-old church and monastery were damaged for the first time ever. Interestingly, the monastery was rebuilt in 1699 during the Maunder Minimum. Combined with heavy rainfall, extreme weather will devastate a significant portion of our food production. For instance, heavy rainfall destroyed a quarter of all crops in Greece in just two days in September. However, mainstream media remains silent. Photo: X @safe0007/Sandor Feher

    NOAA Predicts Zero Sunspots for Almost the Whole 2030s

    CLIMATEThe United States' government scientific organization, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), predicts zero sunspots from 2031 to 2040. This is an extreme situation that has not occurred in as long as humanity has been counting sunspots, and it leads us into uncharted territory in terms of our solar system. However, this prediction aligns with the warnings of the world-renowned solar researcher Valentina Zharkova for many years, who indicated in 2019 various signs of this catastrophic phenomenon, including the extreme hailstorms we have seen in Europe and the world this summer. The forecast and various observations this year give cause for very significant concern. In this unique analysis, Free West Media explains why.

    NATIONALIST COLLABORATION TAKES SHAPE. Six parties met in Budapest on August 26th to sign a joint declaration confirming the friendship and political unity among the parties. The goal is to either form a new group in the European Parliament after the EU elections in June next year or to reconstitute the existing Identity and Democracy (ID) group with the new parties. Pictured from left to right: Mikael Jansson (Alternative for Sweden), Thierry Baudet (Forum for Democracy, Netherlands), László Toroczkai (Mi Hazánk, Hungary), Kostadin Kostadinov (Vazrazhdane, Bulgaria), and Josef Nerušil (Svoboda a přímá demokracie, Czech Republic). Also included is Mass-Voll from the non-EU country Switzerland (inset image). Photo: Free West Media

    European Nationalist Parties Forge Cooperation Ahead of EU Elections

    EUROPEAN ELECTIONSOn Saturday, August 26, representatives of six European nationalist parties gathered in Budapest. The meeting was initiated by the Hungarian party Mi Hazánk and took place in the national parliament. Representatives of the parties signed a joint declaration that not only reaffirms the parties' friendship but also their unity on a range of complex political issues. A surprisingly clear and radical manifesto was established. The hope is that this cooperation will lead to success in the EU elections and eventually result in the formation of a group in the European Parliament. For Swedish nationalism, this meeting marks a success as Sweden, for the first time, has a party represented in a leading nationalist cooperation in Europe. Free West Media was present at this historic event.

    Sweden's Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson participated in the Pride parade in Stockholm where Erdogan was ridiculed, something that Turkey took particularly badly. Photo: Nya Tider

    Turkey Believes Sweden Hasn’t Done Enough

    Sweden will have to wait a bit longer for NATO membership, according to Turkey's Justice Minister Jilmaz Tunc. First, Sweden must extradite the "terrorists" Turkey wants and stop the desecration of the Quran.

    Ka-52 crashes after being hit by a Swedish RBS 70. Russian sources report that one of the two pilots died in the crash. Image: Telegram

    Swedish Weapon Takes Down Russia’s Best Attack Helicopter

    The Russian attack helicopter Ka-52 is considered one of the world's best and has struck fear in Ukraine, where it has hunted down tanks and other armored vehicles, often beyond the range of many light anti-aircraft systems. However, it has met its match in the Swedish air defense missile system RBS 70, which has quickly led to significant losses for the Russian helicopter forces.

    The Sun has been found to be the main driver behind Earth's cliamte - and it's getting colder. Photo: iStockPhoto

    The Sun Drives Earth’s Climate, Not Carbon Dioxide

    Top Researchers Push Back Against Climate Lies."The correlation is as clear as day," explained the Israeli astrophysicist Nir Shaviv, who was hailed by the establishment, before his interview with Forbes was hastily deleted. What he says contradicts the climate narrative, which points to humans as responsible for Earth's climate. Shaviv firmly asserts that it is the sun that controls the climate, something that can be scientifically proven in many ways. Contrary to the popular belief, the sun's influence on Earth has, in recent years, caused unusually cold and rainy weather, a trend that solar researchers warn will worsen significantly in the coming decades. The sun has exhibited an unusually low activity since 2016, during Solar Cycle 24, which was the weakest in a century.

    Alternative for Germany held its conference during the last weekend of July in the thousand-year-old city of Magdeburg, located by the Elbe River in the eastern German state of Saxony. The first of the two conference days began with a strong program speech by the party's male spokesperson. Subsequently, party officials were elected and motions were addressed. The second day was entirely devoted to candidate selection and positioning for the EU election in June next year. Screenshot: AfD on Facebook

    Strong Confidence in German AfD

    Alternative for Germany (AfD) held a party conference on July 29-30 to select candidates for the upcoming EU election next year. EU Parliament member Maximilian Krah, belonging to the party's more radical, ethnonationalist faction, was appointed as the top candidate. The party's two spokespersons delivered powerful speeches criticizing the EU's failed migration policy and trade sanctions that isolate Europe and Germany from the rest of the world. They argued that it's time for the EU to return a significant portion of its power to national parliaments. However, they have dropped the demand for Germany to exit the EU.

    Maximilian Krah is one of the AfD politicians who is singled out as an ethnonationalist, as he has stated that there is a distinction between ethnic Germans and immigrants who have obtained German citizenship. Krah is a Member of the European Parliament and AfD's top candidate for the upcoming European Union election next year. Still image: AfD on Facebook

    The Establishment Wants to Ban Germany’s Second Largest Party – for the Sake of Democracy

    The rising popularity of AfD has raised strong concerns within the establishment. Despite lies and demonization in the media and isolation from the overall political establishment, the party continues to grow. Certain representatives of the party are accused of becoming increasingly "extreme," and in an unusual move, the influential weekly newspaper Der Spiegel demanded that AfD be "banned."

    FvD was quick to support the protests against covid restrictions. Today, the party also stands behind the farmers protests against the governments’ plans to close a big portion of the farms in the country for the sake of “climate”. The picture is from a protest against covid restrictions in Amsterdam in January of last year. Photo: Wion

    Dutch FvD break through the media blockade

    What is happening in the Netherlands? It is often difficult to follow events in other countries, especially when distorted by system media. We give Forum for Democracy (FvD) the opportunity to speak out on the political situation in the Netherlands and the staunch resistance they face in trying to save the country.

    Go to archive