Skip to Content

2019 Gay Pride in Geneva, Switzerland. Photo: Delia Giandeini
Warsaw

Poland plans to withdraw from Istanbul Convention

Even if the political debate over The Istanbul Convention is also a uniquely Polish debate about the conservative orientation of the country's domestic politics, the criticism against this Convention is more than justified.

Published: August 10, 2020, 10:16 am

    There is certainly a reason why only 36 of the 47 member states of the Council of Europe have ratified this treaty so far. Countries such as Great Britain, Latvia, Lithuania, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and the Ukraine are among those who have refused to sign the treaty.

    The Istanbul Convention is an almost classic example of how the struggle against violence against women is strategically brought to the fore in order to promote a different agenda, since nobody would dare to contradict the main premise. The devil is in the detail, however  – in the small print of the treaty.

    Such lobbies with an emotional bent, have long been used as a strategy by international organisations and treaties to promote a distinct change in the definition of gender. UN Women, the women’s political arm of the UN, adopted a new definition of women in its daily work long ago and thus, analogously, an extension of the right to represent the enforcement of LGBT rights.

    The snappy formula on the website of the UN Women reads: “Gender equality and the abolition of violence against all girls and women, including lesbians, bisexuals, transsexuals and gender non-conformists must be achieved”. The chairwoman of UN Women, Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka – the scandal-ridden Deputy President of South Africa from 2005 to 2008 – declared that anyone who campaigns against violence against women and girls cannot exclude the LGBT community.

    During Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka’s tenure as Minister of Minerals and Energy the parastatal company PetroSA made an advance payment of ZAR15 million (approx. $1.5 million) to a private company Imvume, which in turn made a ZAR11 million donation to the ANC ahead of the 2004 elections. Imvume has close links to the ANC. These events have been dubbed the “Oilgate” scandal by South African media. In January 2006 it emerged that the globalist puppet Mlambo-Ngcuka went with her family and a friend Thuthukile Mazibuko-Skweyiya in December 2005, on a taxpayer-funded holiday at the cost of ZAR4 million to the United Arab Emirates. This was dubbed the “Gravy Plane” scandal by the South African media. Photo: Wikipedia

    The irony is that in South Africa, Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka’s constituents – the black population – is extremely hostile towards the LGBT community. It is one of the inside jokes in the “democratic” country which reveals the great divide between the puppet ANC kleptocracy and its voters.

    This is the main problem of the Istanbul Convention: While it may be positive that governments want to use it to combat sexual harassment, rape, female genital mutilation, forced abortion, sterilization and forced marriage, as well as psychological and domestic violence against women, these acts were also previously prohibited by national and international laws and treaties.

    So why should there be a new treaty?

    In the contract there is also, for example, Article 3c, which includes a new gender definition for all signatories, in which such banal words as “woman” or “man” or even just the biological gender no longer appear. Instead, it says: “For the purposes of this Convention, the term ‘gender’ denotes the societal roles, behaviors, activities and characteristics that a particular society deems appropriate for women and men.”

    This contradicts not only scientific findings and the views of the majority of the world’s population, but also all other definitions of “gender” in the previous EU treaties and national constitutions. With the convention, a pre-programmed collision between national and European legislation has been created.

    As if that weren’t enough, Article 12.1 also states: “The contracting parties shall take the necessary measures to bring about changes in social and cultural behavior patterns of women and men with the aim of eliminating prejudices, customs, traditions and all other approaches that may arise the idea of inferiority of women or based on role assignments for women and men.”

    The German government for example – one of the signatories – thus signed an agreement to take the “necessary measures” in order to change the “prejudices” of its population. Benevolent and non-violent German men – the majority –will soon discover that their previous notions of gender had been “wrong” and punishable because they no longer correspond to the current notions of “gender equality”.

    The English translation puts it even more clearly, as it speaks of “stereotypical roles” for men and women to be combated. In 2010 already, the Council of Europe tried in all seriousness to ban the further depiction of women as mothers and housewives in the media across Europe, because this depiction of women was supposedly an example of “sexist stereotypes”.

    What definition of a women will therefore be considered politically correct and free of prejudice?

    According to this document, all ideas of family or marriage are to be abandoned as stereotypes of a binary “forced heteronormative” world view; they are prejudices and traditions and thus obstacles on the way to an all-encompassing gender equality, the way forward to a genderless utopia.

    It is obvious why Poland does not want to sign this treaty. The real question is why countries would want to sign it at all.

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    Europe

    EU Migration Pact: Breaking Eastern European resistance

    Critics fear that this pact will not only accelerate immigration, but that the pact is intended to break the resistance of the Eastern European states to migration.

    Researchers sound the alarm: Swedes will be minority in 45 years

    HelsinkiA Swedish weekly has revealed figures from Statistics Sweden that show that in as many as 18 municipalities, children with two Swedish-born parents are already a minority. Minority status for Swedish newborns now prevail in large cities such as Malmö, Helsingborg and Eskilstuna, but also in rural municipalities such as Lessebo, Hylte and Fagersta.

    Merkel welcomes 3000 arsonists from Moria migrant camp

    BerlinThe CDU, under Angela Merkel, has developed into a party which permanently violates German law. This week, the chancellor announced the latest breach of law in welcoming the arsonists from Moria.

    Turkish agents in Germany ‘a ticking time bomb’

    BerlinIs Turkey spying on Germany? Does Ankara support Turkish extremists in Germany? Stefan Keuter, deputy in the Bundestag for the Eurosceptic AfD party, recently wanted to know exactly what was going on between the two countries. He has received rather disturbing answers from Berlin.

    Dutch legal experts comment on Wilders’ conviction

    LeidenPaul Cliteur is a professor in Leiden, The Netherlands, a member of the Senate with Forum for Democracy, and the author of, among others, The State vs Wilders. Cliteur commented on the curious verdict recently announced against Geert Wilders.

    Doubts about the official Navalny narrative

    International experts, journalists and politicians have all expressed considerable doubts and criticism about the official poisoning story of Alexei Navalny.

    The Wilders trial – a travesty of justice

    The HagueGeert Wilders, the leader of the Party for Freedom [Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV] in the Netherlands, has been convicted of disparaging a "racial" group - criminal Moroccans.

    German left-wing politicians justify violence in Leipzig

    LeipzigGerman President Frank-Walter Steinmeier has not yet condemned the left-wing extremist excesses of violence in Leipzig in which police officers were injured in battles against the "autonomist" Antifa sympathizers. And he is not the only politician supporting the extremists.

    EU pushes ahead with undemocratic and ideological UN Migration Pact

    The EU Commission has quietly and surreptitiously proceeded with its unpopular Migration Pact. The globalists obviously do not want to debate the issue in public.

    Mayor of Antwerp bets on heavy artillery against immigrant gangs

    Antwerp The mayor of Antwerp has mobilized great resources to put an end to the organized crime which is rampant in the Belgian port metropolis.

    Go to archive