Skip to Content

Sakari Linden. Screenshot from Kuva AfS video.

The geopolitical future of Nordic countries

Between unity and disunity, independence and foreign interference: Nordic countries have to either choose between creating an independent neutral block in the North, or seeing the region being divided between the great powers.

Published: March 25, 2019, 8:29 am

    Sakari Linden, Foreign Policy Advisor of the group Europe of Nations and Freedom in the European Parliament, argues that in order to become a stable and prosperous geopolitical unit of its own, the Nordic region should be militarily neutral, thus making it an attractive partner in international relations and trade.

    The Nordic countries have had times of unity and disunity. The wider European integration project has emphasized the importance of economic and political centers of Western Europe since the 1990s and left aside cooperation between the Nordic countries. However, the problems arising from European integration can become an opportunity for Nordic cooperation.

    From the Kalmar Union to the era of European integration

    The Kalmar Union is still considered to be the golden era of Nordic unity. It lasted from 1397 to 1523, even though there were several interruptions during the time that the union existed.

    Flags of the former Kalmar Union.Photo supplied

    A new golden era of Nordic cooperation started after the Second World War. The results of Nordic cooperation included the building of a passport-free travel area in 1952, the creation of the Nordic labour market in 1954, as well as the implementation of the Nordic Convention on Social Security in 1955.

    Finnish and Swedish membership in the European Union conclusively signaled the end of that era. European integration replaced Nordic cooperation as the main pillar of the Nordic countries’ international strategy.

    Almost 25 years after the paradigm shift by Finland and Sweden, Europe looks very different. The European Union is floundering and the United Kingdom will soon become the first member state to leave the EU.

    The European integration has reached a stalemate and is being torn apart by several centrifugal forces, i.e. differing views on migration, economic and monetary policies as well as foreign and security policies. It is no wonder, since there has never been a single political centre in Europe.

    The Nordic countries in the era of European turmoil

    The crisis of the European Union could turn into an opportunity to revive Nordic cooperation, which has slumbered since the mid-1990s. Deepening cooperation between neighboring countries is an alternative for European-wide integration. Thus, different European regions, e.g. the Nordic region, could establish its own European macro region.

    The deepening of integration on a regional basis, stems from a simple idea that geographically proximate states share a common history, values and goals in many instances. Nordic cooperation could be a mid-level option for Nordic countries, situated somewhere between individual nation states and an EU federation.

    However, the constraints stemming from the memories of history should be kept in mind. Nordic countries are different, and they should not be put in a single mould.

    It is a Nordic, not only a Scandinavian region!

    The ultimate success of reviving the significance of the Nordic dimension by forming a Nordic geopolitical unit, is conditional. In order for Nordic cooperation to succeed, it has to be acknowledged that the Nordic community is not only Scandinavian, i.e. not only the Scandinavian peninsula of Norway and Sweden plus Denmark, but also Finland, Iceland, Greenland and the Faroe Islands.

    Chairman of the Suomalaisuuden Liitto (Association of Finnish Culture and Identity, Finskhetens Förbund), Professor Emeritus Ilmari Rostila has written an article about the foreign policy background for the linguistic policy of Finland. According to Rostila, Sweden and the Nordic countries, as a prerequisite for Finland’s adherence to the Nordic bloc, required that there be a ”language peace” in Finland, which, according to Swedish media, was meant to keep Swedish as an obligatory subject in Finnish schools.

    The Nordic linguistic and cultural diversity should be recognised in order to make Nordic cooperation sustainable and enable Nordic countries to exist as a geopolitical unit. Nordic cooperation can function with the help of other lingua franca or translation.

    The Swedish language definitely has a place in Finland. Consequently, Swedish-speakers’ linguistic rights and public services in their own languages should be guaranteed. Moreover, Sami indigenous languages should be protected, as well as Meänkieli in Northern Sweden and Kven in Northern Norway.

    The Nordic countries in the dawn of a new geopolitical era

    Geographically speaking, Nordic countries are strategically situated between the Russian landmass, the European mainland, and the Atlantic Ocean and the North American continent. A neutral macro region, which does not want outside powers to interfere in its affairs, would benefit from other great powers’ support against any great power in case of military aggression. Yugoslavia relied on this strategy during the Cold War in its balancing act between NATO and the Warsaw Pact.

    Finland cannot be compared to Poland, the Baltic countries or Sweden in its anti-Russian bias, although its current foreign and security policy line is strongly Western-oriented. The fact that control of Finland passed from Sweden to Russia in 1809, increased its level of autonomy, strengthened the sense of a Finnish identity and made Finnish a language of culture and literature. A strategically close relationship with the Soviet Union during the Cold War was economically beneficial for Finland and strengthened Finland’s status as an independent state in a non-aligned position between West and East.

    Therefore, history teaches us that Finland was not forced to look for Nordic allies, even though a neutral Nordic macro region would be an ideal choice for it. Moreover, a de facto alliance between Russia and China means that Russia can be a gateway to China and its huge markets, which makes an orientation towards the East more attractive.

    In order to become a stable and prosperous geopolitical unit of its own, the Nordic region should be militarily neutral. This would require that Denmark and Norway abandon their memberships of NATO. Simultaneously, Finland and Sweden should abandon their bilateral military treaties with two leading Atlantic states, the US and the UK. Military neutrality and exclusion of outside great power’s interests would make the Nordic region an attractive partner in international relations and trade.

    Can Nordic cooperation fulfill its promises?

    Opportunities for the revival of Nordic cooperation and for the formation of a Nordic geopolitical unit, does not seem realistic at the moment. Firstly, all Nordic countries should be attractive partners to each other in order to make the new rise of Nordic cooperation a success. It seems that Norway takes care of its wealth and Denmark is able to defend its interests. But if Sweden has destabilized its society with excessive and the wrong kind of migration and Finland has atrophied its economy as a Eurozone member state, they cannot expect other Nordic countries to base their international strategy on cooperation with them.

    Secondly, Denmark, Iceland and Norway are currently NATO members. Moreover, Finland and Sweden also have, to an increasing extent, aligned their foreign policies to support Euro-Atlantic interests. The two countries have concluded bilateral defense treaties with the leading Atlantic military powers, the United States and the United Kingdom. These defense treaties give an impression that the Nordic region is not an independent geopolitical unit, but that it has submitted to outside interests. The burden of belonging to the Euro-Atlantic community, could include defending the Baltic territorial integrity. Is this really what Nordic countries want? It remains a pivotal question.

    The willingness of the Nordic community to become the appropriately diverse and unified geopolitical unit, which aims to keep outside interests out and preserve its countries’ sovereignty, will determine the future of the Nordic region. As an alternative to a macro region consisting of independent and neutral nation states, there is the region with the presence of opposing great powers pursuing their own, possibly intrusive, interests.

    The writer/author is a Foreign Policy Advisor of the Europe of Nations and Freedom in the European Parliament

    The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of any other actor.

     

    opinion@freewestmedia.com

    Exclusively for freewestmedia.com

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    Europe

    Ukraine elects its first Jewish president

    KievA real comedian, Volodymyr Zelensky, better known for playing a president in a TV show, won the final round of the presidential election on Sunday. The incumbent President Petro Poroshenko has conceded defeat.

    Act XXIII: Journalists targeted by police in Paris

    ParisJournalists covering the Yellow Vest demonstration have reported that some of their colleagues have been arrested by the police. Others have been victims of police violence.

    Notre Dame: Was it arson?

    ParisOne of three jihadists involved in a foiled plot in 2016 to launch an attack on the Notre Dame cathedral in Paris was sentenced to eight years in prison by a French court just days before before a fire destroyed the iconic spire and roof.

    In a Yellow Vest through Paris

    ParisAn exclusive FWM reportage on the Yellow Vest movement that has riled French President Emmanuel Macron for months now. Our reporter joined a group of the famous gilets jaunes.

    Notre Dame blaze destroys French national unity

    ParisWhile French and Catholics mourn the tragedy that struck the cathedral of Paris on Monday, Internet users, especially Muslims, preferred instead to celebrate the fire with insults and shameful ridicule.

    Huge loss for France as iconic 850- year old Notre Dame embers smolder

    ParisThe origin of the gigantic fire, which devastated the Notre-Dame de Paris cathedral on Monday, is still unknown, but an investigation was opened for "involuntary destruction by fire," announced the Paris prosecutor's office in the evening.

    Finns Party wins second highest score in election

    HelsinkiA conservative political party that campaigned against open borders and climate change policies won the second-highest number of seats in Finland's parliamentary elections on Sunday.

    Austria warns of new mass migration wave being prepared

    ViennaAustrian Interior Minister Herbert Kickl (FPÖ) has warned in a letter to the EU Commission that Europe will be facing a new wave of mass immigration.

    Report highlights Russia’s advantage in GNSS spoofing capabilities

    The Russian Federation has a "growing a comparative advantage in the targeted use and development of GNSS spoofing capabilities to achieve tactical and strategic objectives at home and abroad," a new study has found.

    Polls show that Macron’s Great National Debate flopped

    ParisThe French president and his ministers seem to be paying a high price for their mismanagement of the Great National Debate.

    Go to archive