Skip to Content

Mark Sedwill, British civil servant, Wikipedia

UK National Security Advisor tears up the Magna Carta

The UK National Security Advisor, Sir Mark Sedwill was asked by a Whitehall panel about the evidence available implicating Russia in the Skripal affair recently. The Q&A took place after Sir Mark’s speech to the Defence Committee of the UK parliament and provided much insight into how Britain functions today.

Published: May 10, 2018, 7:31 am

    The question to Sedwill: “Do you know who poisoned the Skripals?” To which Sedwill responded: “Not yet.” And despite this glaring lack of information, a huge and devastating campaign against Russia was launched.

    Sedwill served as the United Kingdom’s Ambassador to Afghanistan from 2009 to 2010 and the NATO Senior Civilian Representative in Afghanistan in 2010.

    He was the Private Secretary to the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs from 2000 to 2002 in the run-up to and preparations for the 2003 Iraq invasion also based on a false premise.

    Yet Sedwill did not hesitate to issue the following statement in the wake of the mysterious Skripal incident. “I set out the reasons for our clear assessment of Russian responsibility, the measured but clear response we were taking, the wider pattern of malign behaviour into which Salisbury fits, and the importance of a renewed and wider international focus, including from the EU, on the challenge Russia represents to our shared interests and values.”

    Sedwill’s speech to the Defence Committee addressed the application of the UK’s new security doctrine, called the Fusion Doctrine. It sounds like a culinary fad. In cooking the term implies a mixture of cultures, a bit the same as a restaurant that offers a mixed cuisine.

    The new UK doctrine however means no restrictions on ethical or legal limits, and by any means necessary. This is reflected in various British documents. For example, the UK’s National Security Capabilities Review, recently published, states: “ For modern purposes we use the full range of capabilities available to us.”

    In the following section, it also notes: “Many capabilities that can contribute to national security lie outside national security departments.”

    That suggests that the competent departments are in fact incompetent and do not know what to decide regarding national security. It seems surprising to think that law enforcement or intelligence services can not really ensure the safety of the UK.

    The Fusion Doctrine implies that a political choice informs decisions related to an act of deterrence. Such decisions are thus reinforced not by an investigation, but by political expediency. In the past no stone was left unturned to avoid this manner of making difficult choices because of its serious pitfalls.

    Negative PR campaigns currently shape the main thrust of British deterrence. Its adoption has enabled the UK to move with much greater speed in launching devastating international campaigns against a perceived enemy, especially where facts are lacking.

    Sedwill actually acknowledges this. “So we were much faster and acted based on intelligence data, instead of waiting for the [Skripal]investigation to be completed – it is still ongoing.” Naturally such “intelligence data” remains conveniently “classified”.

    He added: “We acted based on an intelligence assessment.” So deterrence is decided not based on any thorough investigation, but on an “assessment”. It means facts are no longer useful in informing action.

    “We demonstrated our initial position to Russia; there were only two explanations. Then as you know the Prime Minister introduced a whole series of measures, and we worked to bring our allies on our side.”

    Sedwill concluded: “That is essentially an example of the Fusion Doctrine.” So it seems that Perfidious Albion has prevailed and it know operates under a new name: Fusion Doctrine.

    Signed and sealed in the year 1215 the Magna Carta has always been viewed as the sole inception of the idea of limiting the power of the ruler through legal rules, confirming it as part of England’s statute law.

    Unlike the principle of legal state, the rule of law is closely linked to justice, separation of powers and legal certainty.

    Aristotle in his Politics submitted this theory of the separation of powers but the most famous version was being suggested by Montesquieu in De L’Espirit des Lois. His arguments indicate that there were three functions of government, Legislative as the law-making body, Executive as the law-applying body and Judiciary as the Law-Enforcing body.

    Since the UK was never invaded and colonized by other countries, the island has never needed a written constitution and this has been most convenient recently.

    Apart from a series of incidents including one where Margaret Thatcher departed from the convention, the convention seemed to be working reasonably well, until now.

    The fusion of powers is the uniqueness of the United Kingdom but there is clearly a need to adopt a US like constitution with Strict Separation of Powers to stop powerful lobbies from entertaining their narrow agendas.

    The British have torn up their famous document, the Magna Carta, with their new venture: First find a goal, then the justification and finally “ get the allies on board”, when facts tend to get in the way.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    • Dave S

      We haven’t torn it up, we have a constitution in the form of a series of constitutional acts, the magna carta, the bill of rights, but we are under occupation by a foreign power who do not respect our laws. Having them written down a second time would not change this.

      In 2002 in the case of Thoburn v Sunderland City Council, Lord Justice Laws reaffirmed that constitutional acts are not subject to the doctrine of implied repeal. This means they need a specific act of repeal rather than just being overwritten by newer laws. (you can see this working in the way some of the old parts of magna carta were repealed) Liars in the occupation government claim that any law which does not suit them is implicitly repealed, despite that not being the case, and thuggish pigs brutally enforce the unlawful whims of the occupation government with gratuitous violence.

      We need to start fighting back. We don’t need more paperwork, we need more people who are prepared to physically fight for their rights! The only thing UK occupation government listens to is people blowing up the buildings they need to fleece us all, if you’re not blowing shit up you’re unheard.

    Europe

    Marine rips into Macron’s failed policies in live interview

    ParisMarine Le Pen, leader of the Front National, was a guest on the political talk show on French television where she ripped into unpopular President Macron's failing policies.

    Scandal shakes German refugee authority: Cash for asylum

    More than 25 000 asylum cases will have to be re-processed after Germany's Federal Office for Refugees and Migration (BAMF) became mired in a corruption scandal at its regional office in the northern city of Bremen.

    Britain’s claims about Skripal affair ‘precarious’ says German media

    BerlinGerman intelligence already had a sample of the nerve agent used to poison the Skripals in the United Kingdom at least two decades ago. And so did the US and Britain.

    Crisis brewing in ‘parking lot for migrants’

    Some 120 000 migrants are currently heading towards Croatia, en route to enter the European Union via the popular Western Balkan route. Croatian police have been put on alert.

    US newspaper urges Ukraine to bomb Kerch Strait bridge

    As Russian President Vladimir Putin opened the Kerch Strait Bridge connecting Crimea with mainland Russia on Tuesday, an opinion piece in an American newspaper urged Ukraine to bomb the bridge.

    Large EU firms are pulling out of Iran

    Major European firms have started to pull out of Iran to avoid being hit by harsh US sanctions despite tough talk by EU leaders.

    Leaked Italian manifesto suggest lifting of anti-Russian sanctions

    RomeIn a leaked manifesto, entitled Government for Change, calls for sanctions against Russia to be scrapped in Italy have been revealed. If this happens, Germany and France, could soon follow suit.

    Hungary and Poland stand firm against EU’s immigration plans

    WarsawAt the beginning of this month, 58 European and African countries gathered in Morocco in Marrakech to discuss issues such as migration and development. The EU plans to support immigration to Europe, not to stop it.

    Italy inching towards forming new government

    Leader of Italy's 5-Star Movement (M5S), Luigi Di Maio said that a fresh meeting with League chief Matteo Salvini on the formation of a new government went well on Friday.

    ‘Ukraine is turning into a territory where nothing works’

    Former Ukrainian President Leonid Kuchma warned that Ukraine was rapidly becoming a lawlessness territory "where nothing works". But could that be impacting South Africa?

    Go to archive