Skip to Content

Mark Sedwill, British civil servant, Wikipedia

UK National Security Advisor tears up the Magna Carta

The UK National Security Advisor, Sir Mark Sedwill was asked by a Whitehall panel about the evidence available implicating Russia in the Skripal affair recently. The Q&A took place after Sir Mark’s speech to the Defence Committee of the UK parliament and provided much insight into how Britain functions today.

Published: May 10, 2018, 7:31 am

    The question to Sedwill: “Do you know who poisoned the Skripals?” To which Sedwill responded: “Not yet.” And despite this glaring lack of information, a huge and devastating campaign against Russia was launched.

    Sedwill served as the United Kingdom’s Ambassador to Afghanistan from 2009 to 2010 and the NATO Senior Civilian Representative in Afghanistan in 2010.

    He was the Private Secretary to the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs from 2000 to 2002 in the run-up to and preparations for the 2003 Iraq invasion also based on a false premise.

    Yet Sedwill did not hesitate to issue the following statement in the wake of the mysterious Skripal incident. “I set out the reasons for our clear assessment of Russian responsibility, the measured but clear response we were taking, the wider pattern of malign behaviour into which Salisbury fits, and the importance of a renewed and wider international focus, including from the EU, on the challenge Russia represents to our shared interests and values.”

    Sedwill’s speech to the Defence Committee addressed the application of the UK’s new security doctrine, called the Fusion Doctrine. It sounds like a culinary fad. In cooking the term implies a mixture of cultures, a bit the same as a restaurant that offers a mixed cuisine.

    The new UK doctrine however means no restrictions on ethical or legal limits, and by any means necessary. This is reflected in various British documents. For example, the UK’s National Security Capabilities Review, recently published, states: “ For modern purposes we use the full range of capabilities available to us.”

    In the following section, it also notes: “Many capabilities that can contribute to national security lie outside national security departments.”

    That suggests that the competent departments are in fact incompetent and do not know what to decide regarding national security. It seems surprising to think that law enforcement or intelligence services can not really ensure the safety of the UK.

    The Fusion Doctrine implies that a political choice informs decisions related to an act of deterrence. Such decisions are thus reinforced not by an investigation, but by political expediency. In the past no stone was left unturned to avoid this manner of making difficult choices because of its serious pitfalls.

    Negative PR campaigns currently shape the main thrust of British deterrence. Its adoption has enabled the UK to move with much greater speed in launching devastating international campaigns against a perceived enemy, especially where facts are lacking.

    Sedwill actually acknowledges this. “So we were much faster and acted based on intelligence data, instead of waiting for the [Skripal]investigation to be completed – it is still ongoing.” Naturally such “intelligence data” remains conveniently “classified”.

    He added: “We acted based on an intelligence assessment.” So deterrence is decided not based on any thorough investigation, but on an “assessment”. It means facts are no longer useful in informing action.

    “We demonstrated our initial position to Russia; there were only two explanations. Then as you know the Prime Minister introduced a whole series of measures, and we worked to bring our allies on our side.”

    Sedwill concluded: “That is essentially an example of the Fusion Doctrine.” So it seems that Perfidious Albion has prevailed and it know operates under a new name: Fusion Doctrine.

    Signed and sealed in the year 1215 the Magna Carta has always been viewed as the sole inception of the idea of limiting the power of the ruler through legal rules, confirming it as part of England’s statute law.

    Unlike the principle of legal state, the rule of law is closely linked to justice, separation of powers and legal certainty.

    Aristotle in his Politics submitted this theory of the separation of powers but the most famous version was being suggested by Montesquieu in De L’Espirit des Lois. His arguments indicate that there were three functions of government, Legislative as the law-making body, Executive as the law-applying body and Judiciary as the Law-Enforcing body.

    Since the UK was never invaded and colonized by other countries, the island has never needed a written constitution and this has been most convenient recently.

    Apart from a series of incidents including one where Margaret Thatcher departed from the convention, the convention seemed to be working reasonably well, until now.

    The fusion of powers is the uniqueness of the United Kingdom but there is clearly a need to adopt a US like constitution with Strict Separation of Powers to stop powerful lobbies from entertaining their narrow agendas.

    The British have torn up their famous document, the Magna Carta, with their new venture: First find a goal, then the justification and finally “ get the allies on board”, when facts tend to get in the way.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    • Dave S

      We haven’t torn it up, we have a constitution in the form of a series of constitutional acts, the magna carta, the bill of rights, but we are under occupation by a foreign power who do not respect our laws. Having them written down a second time would not change this.

      In 2002 in the case of Thoburn v Sunderland City Council, Lord Justice Laws reaffirmed that constitutional acts are not subject to the doctrine of implied repeal. This means they need a specific act of repeal rather than just being overwritten by newer laws. (you can see this working in the way some of the old parts of magna carta were repealed) Liars in the occupation government claim that any law which does not suit them is implicitly repealed, despite that not being the case, and thuggish pigs brutally enforce the unlawful whims of the occupation government with gratuitous violence.

      We need to start fighting back. We don’t need more paperwork, we need more people who are prepared to physically fight for their rights! The only thing UK occupation government listens to is people blowing up the buildings they need to fleece us all, if you’re not blowing shit up you’re unheard.

    Europe

    Why does Switzerland’s UN representative want open borders?

    Jürg Lauber, the representative of Switzerland at the UN, was instrumental in writing The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, together with the representative from Mexico.

    Orban: ‘Europe without nations will cease to exist’

    HelsinkiEurope would lose its spiritual and cultural identity without its nations, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban told his audience at a European People’s Party (EPP) congress in Helsinki on Thursday.

    Salvini already has a plan to cut Italy’s debt

    RomeThe European Central Bank chief Mario Draghi said at Monday's Eurogroup meeting with Economy Minister Giovanni Tria, that Italy needs to cut its high debt, EU sources said on Wednesday. The country's Interior Minister already has a plan.

    Dutch daily exposes cross-border grooming gangs

    AntwerpThe Dutch chapter of aid an organisation dealing with underage prostitution is working together with the Flemish municipality of Antwerp to tackle the increase in human trafficking and grooming gangs.

    Marine Le Pen beats Macron in latest poll

    ParisSovereignist parties secured a combined 30 percent of support in the latest poll with Marine Le Pen’s National Rally ahead of French President Emmanuel Macron’s party for the European Parliament elections.

    UK war propaganda outfit to move to The Netherlands

    The HagueThe pro-war British research collective Bellingcat is planning to expand into the Netherlands and to open a permanent office in The Hague, DutchNews.nl reported on Friday.

    French politician attacks UN Global Compact: ‘Time for change!’

    BrusselsNicolas Bay, member of the European parliament and co-president of the group “Europe of Nations and Freedom” gave an exclusive comment to FreeWestMedia on the “Global Compact for Migration”.

    French magazine outlines new hyperviolence linked to immigration

    ParisOne of France’s leading conservative news magazines has highlighted the "denial, abandonment and powerlessness" of the French state faced with hordes of foreigners who do not fit in and do not want to become French.

    Germany: Horror rapes and sexual assaults

    Yet another horror rape case in the Bavarian capital Munich, has caused outrage in Germany. Once again, the suspects are foreigners, asylum seekers from Afghanistan. Sadly, it is one of many such cases.

    AfD a clear winner in German regional election

    FrankfurtThe clear winner in Hesse's state elections this weekend was the AfD. Unlike the Greens and the FDP, the AfD now sits in all 16 state parliaments - five and a half years after its founding in Hesse's Oberursel.

    Go to archive