Skip to Content

European Court to decide if Islamic Sharia Law can override Civil Law

Can Islamic religious sharia law override a European country's domestic law? The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights is weighing that question as we write. Rulings handed down by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights cannot be appealed.

Published: December 10, 2017, 1:34 pm

    Read more

    The Court is expected to issue its decision in the next few months.

    The Court heard a case this past week where sharia law was applied to a disagreement between citizens of Greece who are Muslims.

    Christian Concern (CC), a non-profit organisation based in London, intervened in the case, “because of the importance of the case in European law and its implications for countries across Europe, including the UK,” according to a press statement by CC.

    “We intervened in the case in order to make clear that sharia law is fundamentally incompatible with human rights,” Tim Dieppe, head of public policy of Christian Concern, declared on its website. “We hope and pray that the judges will see this and act accordingly.”

    Christian Concern say sharia law is “discriminatory” and its intervention in this case reveals the pitfalls facing the judiciary with sharia law applied in the UK.

    According to Dieppe, an estimated 85 sharia courts operate in the UK. “The use of Sharia has led to the promotion of parallel societies within the United Kingdom,” he told CBN News. “Sharia itself has disproportionately affected women and gives no legal rights to non-Muslims.”

    “The United Kingdom has also become the European hub for Islamic finance,” he added. “Any Grand Chamber ruling promoting the use of Sharia would only further give weight to the growing segregation of the Muslim community in England and its disassociation with democratic and British values.”

    The particular case in Greece, Molla Sali v. Greece, involved a dispute over an inheritance. After her husband died, Sali inherited his entire estate under his will written according to Greek law.

    But two sisters of the husband maintain that sharia law should govern how the inheritance is divided because the man was a member of the Muslim community in Thrace. Also, a mufti must oversee that process, they say. A mufti is regarded as a Muslim legal expert in religious law.

    “They relied in particular on the 1920 Treaty of Sèvres and the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, which provided for Islamic customs and Islamic religious law to be applied to Greek nationals who were Muslims,” the European Court of Human Rights stated in a news release.

    “A ruling that sharia law should have precedence over the state’s civil law would set an alarming precedent for the Council of Europe’s 47 Member States, including the United Kingdom,” Dieppe responded. “By contrast, a ruling that civil law should overrule sharia law would have legal benefit throughout the Council of Europe.”

    “We are hoping that the Court continues its line of precedent that Sharia is incompatible with a democratic society,” he told CBN News. “However, if the Court were to rule that Sharia law should have been applied in Miss Molla Sali’s case, it would in essence be ruling that Sharia can enjoy legal supremacy over a nation’s domestic legislation even where the consent of all of the parties to its use in a matter is not present.”

    Meanwhile, the Greek prime minister announced a bill that would make applying sharia law in Thrace optional. The measure says civil law overrides sharia law, unless everyone involved agrees to abide by sharia law.

     

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    • Andy C

      “Meanwhile, the Greek prime minister announced a bill that would make applying sharia law in Thrace optional. The measure says civil law overrides sharia law, unless everyone involved agrees to abide by sharia law.”
      Similar system in the UK. Shouldn’t be permitted.

    Europe

    The Bellingcat phenomenon: how to declare a war against free speech and be awarded for ‘advances in journalism’

    At the end of March an American journalist Brenna T. Smith published a controversial article which consisted of revealing the personal data of people who took part in the storming of the US Capitol on January 6.

    Race for the title of ‘global savior’ – US dials back its hegemony during the pandemic

    The actions of the White House to support its European allies during the pandemic raise questions both from political elites who are loyal to the United States and from those who represent anti-American positions.

    Asylum seekers in Denmark can be sent 700km away – to Rwanda

    CopenhagenPeople who immigrate to Denmark illegally and seek asylum will soon be transported 700 km away and placed in a Danish asylum centre in a Central African country.

    Oxford study finds correlation between blood clotting events and most current vaccines

    MoscowThe developers of Sputnik V, the Russian vaccine against Covid-19, have urged health regulators to look into a University of Oxford study on the correlation between the occurrence of rare blood clotting and vaccines currently injected on a mass scale globally.

    EU countries agree on a uniform vaccination passport

    BerlinAccording to media reports, the member states of the European Union have agreed on a uniform vaccination card for travel within the Union. The EU states are therefore defining their position on the so-called "Green Passport", which should be operational by the end of June.

    Japan as a model for zero immigration

    DresdenDr. Jan Moldenhauer is a member of the AfD state board in Saxony-Anhalt and district chairman of the AfD Magdeburg. In May 2018 he published a study entitled "Japan's policy of zero immigration - a role model for Germany?"

    Development aid funds rise to a record high

    ParisGlobal funds for development aid reached a new high in the past year. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) announced in Paris on Tuesday, that public funds from donor countries rose to more than 161 billion US dollars (around 136 billion euros).

    Vaccine-immune Corona variants conceivable say researchers

    GöttingenCorona variants, against which current vaccines are less effective or no longer effective at all, can also arise in Germany, according to researchers. This is particularly possible with the virus spreading in a third wave, according to Stefan Pöhlmann and Markus Hoffmann from the Leibniz Institute for Primate Research in Göttingen.

    Study: No black goalkeepers in German Bundesliga equals discrimination and ‘racial stacking’

    According to a study, the absence of dark-skinned goalkeepers in the Bundesliga is due to racial discrimination not talent. The reason why individual clubs do not employ black goalkeepers, could be a coincidence, explained integration researcher Tina Nobis from Humboldt University in Berlin. "That there isn't a single black goalkeeper in the Bundesliga, means it's not a coincidence."

    European Court of Human Rights gives the green light for compulsory vaccinations

    StrasbourgIt is the first time that the European Court of Human Rights has dealt with the issue of compulsory vaccination. According to the ECHR, the mandatory vaccinations are in the "best interests" of society. According to experts, the judgment could play a role in the enforcement of Covid vaccinations.

    Go to archive