Skip to Content

Steve Bannon in Europe: No hope, no Pope. Picture: Thor Brødreskift / Nordiske Mediedager (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Betrayal by Bannon

A story of failures: How Steve Bannon tried to split the Vatican and dragged Matteo Salvini into his misfortune.

Published: September 11, 2019, 7:17 pm

    Read more

    Steve Bannon had won many accolades before he arrived in Europe. Bannon was the “shadow president of the White House”, the “great manipulator” and of course the “devoted Roman-Catholic”. When Bannon entered Europe, it was a bit like a Columbus setting foot on the American continent. That is… he was admired by local tribes: the various right wing populist movements.

    Here was the man who had made Donald Trump president. The strong and smart conservative, the man of thought and action united in a single human body. Instead of glass pearls and the Bible, Bannon brought “wisdom” and “secrets of success”. His arrival coincided with Marine Le Pen’s running for the office of French president, and Norbert Hofer from the right wing populist FPÖ, standing a fair chance to win the election for the Austrian presidency. The popularity of both the German AfD and Italian Lega were also rising fast.

    The European tribes were not really sure how to deal with Bannon. For some, he was the ambassador of Trump himself, for others the “man of intellect”. Most saw in him a steadfast and strong Roman-Catholic who would bring God back, instead of Allah who has been busy choosing the furniture for his new European home. Bannon the Christian, Bannon the Catholic, Bannon the Crusader.

    His crusade led him to Italy, one of the last countries with a strong right-wing populist movement which was obviously interested in his advice, while others were more cautious – for various well-considered reasons. Only a few mid-level functionaries from the AfD and other populist parties would pause to take selfies with Bannon.

    Steve Bannon chose Italy as his stronghold, the cradle of Roman Catholicism, the bastion of the Pope, of so many Catholic Saints and of the old battles between the Catholic clergy and the German-dominated Empire of Medieval Times. And he discovered his new arch-enemy there: Pope Francis.

    To avoid any misunderstanding, one should note that it is not known whether Bannon had been an ardent supporter of certain Catholic circles challenging the Vatican in the wake of the Second Ecumenical Council (1960s), or sympathetic to those who doubt or even reject the authority of contemporary Popes. As a loyal Roman-Catholic, Bannon had insisted that he was a devout servant of the Holy See. But the closer he came to the Sancta Sedes, the more he started identifying the Pope as the enemy of humanity.

    In Italy, Bannon launched an attack on the Pope and recommended this very ill-considered strategy to Lega leader and former Minister of the Interior, Matteo Salvini.

    To be clear: There may be many reasons why the Pope is deserving of criticism, or at least reasons enough to ignore him. Maybe the latter would have been the better choice in a country which hosts around 80 percent of Catholic followers and where the Vatican and the Pope himself are national symbols of pride. Yes, that balding individual with his extravagant headgear and red shoes uttering his frequent pronouncements.

    Pope Francis has since morphed into an avid supporter of the autistic teenage climate activist, Greta Thunberg, who also embraces illegal mass migration to Europe and never misses a chance of attacking right-wing populist movements in the hushed tones of a sacred shepherd.

    It was the perfect target for Bannon who had craved increasing attacks on the Pope, and even enunciated some strange notions of perhaps “splitting” the Catholic church with the help of conservative Catholic clerics.

    But attacking the Vatican is akin to attacking the national football team [Die Mannschaft] in Germany or demanding the demolition of the Eiffel tower in France. In other words: There are some smarter strategies to garner public support with.

    Therefore, even the conservative Catholic clerics such as Cardinal Raymond L. Burke have distanced themselves from Steve Bannon. And Salvini? He joined in with Bannon’s rants against Francis, attacking Pope Francis harshly for his pro-migration statements. The Pope fired back and attacked right-wing movements, saying in interviews that he was concerned “because we hear speeches that resemble those of Hitler in 1934”.

    Insiders of the Lega are certain that Bannon – by means of “consultations” – was trying to coax Salvini into starting an anti-Papal campaign. How many elderly Italian women and frequent church visitors would forgive him for that? Bannon certainly did not seem to care. He fantasized about “two churches” in Italy, the “progressive-liberal” Francis church on the one side and the “Catholic working class” community on the other with no sense at all of the ensuing liberal hocus-pocus. It was simply a 1:1 copy of “the people against the elites” strategy that Trump had used during his presidential campaign in the US.

    Actually, what Bannon disliked was a Pope who had criticized his political views, while rejecting the tradition represented by the Pope. What he coveted most was the status of being a “Pope” himself.

    Bannon’s ambition was to replace Francis and become some kind of a “Pope of Honour”, the Pope of the “Catholic working class”. The idea that someone would “pop up” to challenge the Pope, is not a novel one in European history. In Medieval Times, European Christianity actually witnessed two Popes who bitterly fought each other.

    Bannon’s reputation in Europe took a turn for the worse with him posing daily as some kind of religious authority.

    The focus on Bannon’s extroverted “Catholicism” was perhaps misguided, since he is rather driven by another religion, that of Vanity. It is no coincidence that especially Vanity and Vainglory are part of the seven deadly sins of Christianity. Both are seen as odious expressions of self-exaltation.

    Steve Bannon made nothing better but instead he made many things worse on the European continent, a bit like Columbus. He left some glass pearls and other worthless “presents” for the indigenous peoples he had come into contact with. In addition, he may unwittingly have spread some viruses and bacteria.

    Let us hope that Bannon’s expedition to Europe will not deeply harm European sovereigntists. His viruses and bacteria include hypocrisy, vanity and turmoil. Europe certainly does not need a Steve Bannon.

    carlfriedrich@freewestmedia.com

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    • Stev60

      What’s supposed to be the point of this screed? Bannon has proven to be a fairly impotent windbag, but Francis is a Communist-Globalist-Satanist acting in a Joker capacity to wreck Christendom and Europe in service of chaos, Islam, and tyranny. Bannon and Salvini should have sent forces in to clean out the Vatican while they still could.

    • American Disinformation News

      “Bannon’s ambition was to replace Pope Francis”?

    Europe

    Epidemiologist rips ‘increasingly burdensome verification’

    MarseilleIn an interview with a French newspaper, the director of the Marseille University Hospital Institute (IHU), Professor Didier Raoult, defended the effectiveness of chloroquine and said further studies on the drug were just a waste of time.

    Nine major European hospitals now require assistance

    "We will soon be short of important drugs" in the fight against the new Coronavirus, Europe's largest hospital warned in a letter to its respective governments.

    Spain announces highest daily increase in Covid-19 deaths

    MadridSpain's health ministry has announced 838 Covid-19 deaths, the country's highest daily increase in fatalities, bringing the total to 6 528.

    Putin bravely dons hazmat suit to visit Covid-19 patients in Moscow

    MoscowPresident Vladimir Putin donned a yellow hazmat suit to explain to the public the emergency measures taken by the Russian government.

    Italian infections on the rise again despite curfews

    RomeAfter a few days of decline, the number of new cases in Italy have increased again. Wednesday's rise in the number of dead were 683, while on Tuesday the rise was 743. The number of confirmed cases in the US has however surpassed China and Italy to become the largest outbreak in the world.

    How the East fights against the Coronavirus

    MoscowEurope currently appears to be drowning in chaos and dysfunction when it comes to the fight against the Coronavirus. But how is Russia handling the challenge right now?

    Italy faces new emergency as it runs out of disinfectants

    RomeIt will no longer be possible to disinfect hospitals, ambulances, public transport and schools. The League has urged the EU to step in. "The government and Europe must intervene as soon as possible."

    Immigrants revolt against confinement in France, Germany

    ParisWhile drastic containment measures came into effect on March 17 at noon in France, carelessness and incivility persist in the immigrant districts of Paris. The police dispatched on the spot are exasperated with the inhabitants.

    Famous virologist explains risky ‘logic’ of herd immunity

    A virologist twice nominated for the Nobel Prize explains the British strategy of "herd immunity" claiming it may have a logical explanation, but is still too risky.

    Italian specialist: Three diseases that invite risk faced with the Coronavirus

    RomeIt seems that there are no more doubts since the data are clear: The mortality from Covid-19 is higher "for hypertensive patients, patients with cardiac arrhythmias, diabetics and patients with cardiovascular diseases".

    Go to archive