Skip to Content

EU Schengen border control. Photo: Daniel Schludi

European Court of Justice sets new obstacles for deportation

The latest judgment by the European Court of Justice (file number C-517/17 ), which was published on July 16, received little media attention. This decision calls into question the European asylum system.

Published: August 12, 2020, 9:30 am

    Read more

    The highest EU court, whose jurisprudence is binding for all member states, has granted stay to an asylum seeker from Eritrea who had applied for asylum in Germany, although he had already been recognized as a refugee in Italy.

    The responsible Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) in Germany therefore wanted to transfer the man to the Italian authorities as part of a retrial. According to the provisions of the relevant Dublin Regulation, responsibility for asylum-seeking third-country nationals usually lies with the member state in which the person first entered the so-called Schengen area.

    The accompanying procedural guideline 2013/32 therefore provides that an application for international protection in Germany, for example, can be regarded as inadmissible if this protection has already been granted by another EU country, in this case Italy. The ECJ has now significantly increased the hurdles for returning migrants in such cases.

    The Luxembourg judges emphasized that the rejection of an asylum application is only permissible if the person concerned has had the opportunity to be heard personally beforehand. At this hearing – and that is the real crux of the matter – the applicant can comment on whether another member state has actually granted him international protection.

    He is then able to present all the specific circumstances of his case so that the asylum authority can decide on the basis of this information whether the applicant is in “serious danger” if he is transferred to the EU country of first entry and subject to “inhuman or degrading treatment” according to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Should this be the case, the return of the person concerned as provided for in the Dublin Regulation would be inadmissible. The “refugee” is then likely to stay in the member state to which he illegally moved to.

    In the future, the BAMF will have to carefully check each individual case since the authority will have to prove in court that the relevant provisions of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights were adhered to – a long and arduous task. Moreover, whether this requirement is being met in practice is likely to lead to lengthy and controversial discussions. Inadequate accommodation options or hostility from the local population in a member state could be sufficient to make the deportation of a foreigner impossible.

    It is therefore foreseeable that the already comparatively small number of transfers from Germany to other EU countries will continue to decline as a result of this new ruling. In addition, many more “protection seekers” who have already been registered in Italy or other poor Schengen countries, will now make their way to rich EU countries.

    The Luxembourg judge’s verdict is also likely to sow a lot of discord in the EU since it does not value the so-called “European spirit”. The question arises as to how the ECJ made the assumption that the Charter of Fundamental Rights is not being respected by some individual countries. The observance of the fundamental and human rights as well as compliance with the European regulations on migration and asylum, have always been essential prerequisites for open borders in the Schengen zone.

    The decision of the European Court of Justice has yet another unintended consequence: If “refugees’ are not allowed to be sent back to other member states because they are threatened with inhuman or degrading treatment there, then the meaningfulness of the quota regulation wanted by Brussels and Berlin for the distribution of asylum seekers within the EU as the core of a new European asylum policy, would no longer be valid.

    Migrants who have been assigned to an “unattractive” host country, will obviously try to move to their “desired state” because this expectation is strengthened by the new ECJ ruling.

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    • LuciusAnnaeusSeneca

      The European courts sysem is certainly rife with individuals who are
      ideologically in sympathy with illegal migrants. But there are many who
      are even more damaging to the exercise of law and justice, namely those
      who have detached the reason for, and the consequences of, their judicial decisions from the real world and make
      them with no concern for the consequences of their actions, a mere academic exercise. They
      forget that the courts system serves the greater good (society and the
      body politic), and thus should be accountable to it. However, for many
      magistrates and judges, they take the definition of an “independent
      judiciary” to be that of an unaccountable one.

    Europe

    Terror attack near Charlie Hebdo offices: Two critically injured

    ParisTwo migrants injured two people with a butcher's cleaver on Friday morning in Paris. The two attackers were eventually arrested. The national anti-terrorist prosecution will be taking up the case.

    EU Migration Pact: Breaking Eastern European resistance

    Critics fear that this pact will not only accelerate immigration, but that the pact is intended to break the resistance of the Eastern European states to migration.

    Researchers sound the alarm: Swedes will be minority in 45 years

    HelsinkiA Swedish weekly has revealed figures from Statistics Sweden that show that in as many as 18 municipalities, children with two Swedish-born parents are already a minority. Minority status for Swedish newborns now prevail in large cities such as Malmö, Helsingborg and Eskilstuna, but also in rural municipalities such as Lessebo, Hylte and Fagersta.

    Merkel welcomes 3000 arsonists from Moria migrant camp

    BerlinThe CDU, under Angela Merkel, has developed into a party which permanently violates German law. This week, the chancellor announced the latest breach of law in welcoming the arsonists from Moria.

    Turkish agents in Germany ‘a ticking time bomb’

    BerlinIs Turkey spying on Germany? Does Ankara support Turkish extremists in Germany? Stefan Keuter, deputy in the Bundestag for the Eurosceptic AfD party, recently wanted to know exactly what was going on between the two countries. He has received rather disturbing answers from Berlin.

    Dutch legal experts comment on Wilders’ conviction

    LeidenPaul Cliteur is a professor in Leiden, The Netherlands, a member of the Senate with Forum for Democracy, and the author of, among others, The State vs Wilders. Cliteur commented on the curious verdict recently announced against Geert Wilders.

    Doubts about the official Navalny narrative

    International experts, journalists and politicians have all expressed considerable doubts and criticism about the official poisoning story of Alexei Navalny.

    The Wilders trial – a travesty of justice

    The HagueGeert Wilders, the leader of the Party for Freedom [Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV] in the Netherlands, has been convicted of disparaging a "racial" group - criminal Moroccans.

    German left-wing politicians justify violence in Leipzig

    LeipzigGerman President Frank-Walter Steinmeier has not yet condemned the left-wing extremist excesses of violence in Leipzig in which police officers were injured in battles against the "autonomist" Antifa sympathizers. And he is not the only politician supporting the extremists.

    EU pushes ahead with undemocratic and ideological UN Migration Pact

    The EU Commission has quietly and surreptitiously proceeded with its unpopular Migration Pact. The globalists obviously do not want to debate the issue in public.

    Go to archive