Skip to Content


Council of Europe: No compulsory vaccinations and no discrimination against the unvaccinated

On 27 January, the Council of Europe signed Resolution 2361, which states that vaccinations in EU Member States should not be mandatory. Furthermore, persons who have not been vaccinated may not be discriminated against in any way. This effectively stops the notion of "vaccine passports".

Published: February 9, 2021, 9:31 am

    Read more

    The resolution goes so far as to order member states such as Sweden to actively inform citizens of these rights. The resolution has been ignored by mainstream politicians and the media.

    Many citizens have been worried about whether the untested vaccines will be mandatory, since it has already been proposed in several countries. In Sweden, however, it has not been, because of a law which prohibits involuntary medical interventions. But despite this law, governments could exert such strong pressure on their populations, that it could become almost impossible to live without being exposed to this experimental jab.

    In Denmark, a vaccine passport could soon be required to gain access to malls, sports events and other public places, public transport or travel abroad. Happily, the Council of Europe is now putting a firm stop to these plans, since involuntary medical experiments are prohibited by the Nuremberg Convention.

    The Council of Europe is an intergovernmental European cooperation organization with 47 Member States, which, despite its name and the same flag, is separate from the EU. Its resolutions are not legally binding, but recommendations to Member States are almost always complied with. For example, as recently as November last year, the government proposed that Sweden’s laws be amended as a result of the Council of Europe’s convention on cybercrime.

    The resolution on forced vaccination briefly describes the problems caused by the Covid-19 pandemic with the resulting unemployment, economic downturn and poverty. It also points out that there is a certain distrust among the European population regarding a forced vaccination programme. The resolution contains various recommendations for how to achieve a large vaccine intake, but also something unexpected – namely clear provisions for it.

    Point 7.3 of the resolution obliges all Member States to ensure that citizens are informed that Covid vaccinations are NOT (the only word written in capital letters throughout the resolution) mandatory and that no one is politically, socially or otherwise pressured to be vaccinated.

    Secondly – at least as important – Member States must ensure that no one is discriminated against for not being vaccinated because of possible health risks or because the person simply does not want to be vaccinated.

    The latter is particularly interesting given the current propaganda of vaccination passports by the system media and several European governments, which they claim is necessary. The Swedish government announced on February 4 that it has decided to introduce a digital vaccine certificate that will be ready by the summer. But what is it then to be used for, if it becomes illegal to discriminate against someone who does not have it?

    When the Swedish government summarized the most important things from the Council of Europe’s winter session on its website on 29 January, this was not mentioned – by far the most important in the entire resolution – in a single word. It is not difficult to understand why, given the unprecedented propaganda for mass vaccinations from the Swedish government and not least the system media, which is inflated to levels not previously seen even during wartime.

    In Germany, Bavaria’s Prime Minister Söder (CSU) is similarly pushing for compulsory vaccinations for certain professional groups, for example in nursing. And he has even called on the German Ethics Council to help him in this effort. There have in fact been rumours that Söder has been receiving kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies.

    According to the Nuremberg Convention, experimental vaccines can be seen as an experiment on the population. In the case of ModeRNA’s and Pfizer’s mRNA jabs, they have never been previously tested.

    The Convention consists of ten points and the first stipulates: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely necessary. But the question remains: Is it really voluntary if you are not allowed to work, send the children to school, travel or even visit the mall if you do not submit to the experimental vaccines?

    The fifth point states: No experiment should be performed where there is reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur. Countless health and control authorities in several countries stated how they expected this to happen on a fairly large scale. Deaths serious vaccine injuries have already been listed as a result of the vaccinations, including at the US Public Health Agency CDC.

    Readers should download the information on their smartphone to have on hand whenever it becomes necessary to remind government officials of the Council of Europe’s guidelines.

    Council of Europe Resolution 2361 on vaccines:

    7.3 with respect to ensuring high vaccine uptake:
    7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
    7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    • LuciusAnnaeusSeneca

      This resolution by the Council of Europe is ill-advised at best. First, it means that EU countries will continue to use population control (quarantine and restrictions on movement) as a means to counter the spread of COVID-19, even where requiring vaccination may be the most obvious, sensible course of action. Second, per the non-discrimination clause, it does not eliminate the risk of continual reinfection with the virus from those entering the EU, including reinfection with new strains. Finally, it further erodes national sovereignty of member-states, by removing their discretionary use of an option for mandatory vaccination, and thus their right to protect their citizens. All these measures will have significant economic, social, and political consequences, and will likelyh prolong the duration, and likely the intensiveness, of the pandemic.

      • Ask

        But the vaccine after taking it you still have to keep 2m distance and were a mask. They also say it does not prevent 100% re-infection or first infections so restitutions are still needed.

        So my question is why would one take an experimental bio agent, that says can make you infertile? Has lots of side effects. Has shown can kill those that are old and have health issues already.

        Just asking the obvious questions. We as a population do not know what the long term effects are. It could make use all unable to make babies…It could kill off the human race? Can you garentee me that I can sue the pants off those that force that experimental bio agent? If not than I will pass. If you yourself take the vaccine why are you insisting others take it. After all you believe it protects you so you will be fine.

        Something does not add up.

        What I do know is that the globalists top priority is population reduction via vaccines. Even Bill Gates has said this.

        No thank you, but happy for you to do what you wish.

        • Kamisama

          ” Can you guarantee me that I can sue the pants off those that force that experimental bio agent?”

          Nobody can, for exactly this is part of the deal of vaccine makers being able to market the vaccine. That they cannot be sued when things go wrong. It was having that guarantee or they would refuse to even bring a vaccine to the market. They only do this when they know things will have bad repercussions.

          If that is not a major red flag I don’t know what is, and that’s on top of what the possible side effects can be.

          • Steve49

            You sue the politicians since they are the ones pushing it , along with the person actually does the injecting!

            • D La Placa

              Bit difficult to sue when dead.

          • monika adamowicz


      • Kata List Productions
      • Rylan Bannister

        That is, of course, if you are suffering the mass psychotic delusion that there is some new and deadly virus killing off people in droves. Those who suffer that delusion have far more urgent things to worry about, like how can you possibly survive a virus with a 99.97% survival rate.

        But, you are really good at repeating the propaganda they feed you…

        • LuciusAnnaeusSeneca

          My comment focuses on the impact of the Council of Europe decision, and its national sovereignty dimensions. Beyond that, I make no recommendations as to who should or should not be vaccinated. It’s a personal choice, and, as you say, one way or the other, it actually involves low risk.

    • Kata List Productions
    • Veroniqua

      Mandating or Coercing vaccinations is a war crime according to the Nuremberg Code. Stop all this Hitler Crap! Just stop it! Stop taking away peoples human rights and ask yourself why people are being forced to participate in this experiment.

    • Orpheus

      Yah!- COVID-19 did not get enough time to clean up the planet, like Spanish flue did in 1918 when the world had a very small human population.

    • Orpheus

      For those who don’t want to get immunize , I am not joking. If majority listen to them how can we control this disease.? As I have written to Climate Council FB we need to check on human population by limiting number of child births(max 2), to save the rain forests from been cleared, air pollution by more motor cars and more Air travel. In Sri Lanka there is an additional problem of Ethnic unrest unless the Government says “One Man can father only to 2 children, irrespective of Religion or Ethnicity”. When the population grows too much nature will cull them to maintain the balance of nature by sending diseases such as Corona, Tsunami, earth quake etc. China had this rule for 70 years. Can you imagine the population if they did not do it? When too many people swamp the earth, they will destroy the natural habitat of the animals and make the world dry, there will be more wars and diseases etc.

      • Rylan Bannister

        Start by doing the world a favor and removing yourself from it. Your brain has been washed beyond redemption…..

    • Ron Angel

      Your legal rights in the UK regarding vaccines and employment.

    • Ron Angel
    • kenheart

      This is very interesting as the British government are hell bent on coercing people to take their vaccines intimating it will be compulsory for travel.
      There is a great deal of duplicity surrounding this whole farce and nobody should feel compelled to take vaccines that have not gone trough all the usual tests.
      Cases are now emerging of adverse reactions and death after the vaccines so people should be free to make up their own mind.

      • MarkPitrone

        The national governments of the member nations can override the EU parliament within their national borders.

    • EpicKing

      This article is fake news. The European council has no power and all they can do is come with recommandations.
      The Resolution 2361 URGES EU ect to do things. They dont command or tell them what to do, thereby this article is FAKE NEWS

    • MarkPitrone

      So, the seat of socialism in Europe is NOT going to mandate the Vaccine for COVID?

      I am just an American Constitutional conservative, and I WILL NOT comply with our CCP led Communist government, as it is my Constitutional right and duty to tell the federal govenrment that it has no Constitutional authority over the SOVEREIGN American people, singly or corporately.


    Protesters heckle Bill Gates before dinner with Boris Johnson

    LondonBritish Prime Minister Boris Johnson invited around 20 business people to dinner in London on Monday, including Bill Gates and Jamie Dimon, the boss of JPMorgan Chase. Together with these individuals, Johnson wants to build a “Global Britain”.

    Sweden Democrat stirs debate over vaccine ‘poison shot’ and climate

    StockholmIn the Sweden Democrats, a heated discussion has flared up after a Member of Parliament Roger Richthoff, who is also a regular member of the Defense Committee, attracted attention in the media for critical comments about Covid-19 vaccination.

    Hungarian opposition backs conservative Catholic figure to dethrone Orban

    BudapestIn the spring of 2022, the Hungarian opposition believe they will have the opportunity to defeat Viktor Orban, who has been in power since 2010.

    Record cold and snow expected in Northern Hemisphere

    Meteorologists are warning of an extremely cold and snowy winter. The amount of snow in the northern hemisphere is already hundreds of gigatons larger than normal for the season and the South Pole has measured the coldest winter ever since measurements began there. This is astonishing climate news that the system media has chosen to completely ignore.

    Islamist terror attack in Norway – five dead and two injured

    KongsbergA Muslim convert, Espen Andersen Bråthen, 37, is now suspected of having killed five people and injured two more with a crossbow as a weapon in Kongsberg, Norway. Questions are now being raised about the actions of the Norwegian police during the incident, the most important of them all: Could Espen, who was confronted by the police before the murders were committed, have been stopped?

    Who is to blame for the EU’s current gas crisis?

    MoscowThe EU itself is to blame for the gas crisis which is in full swing in Europe, due to "myopia" and because the bloc "ignored the role that natural gas should play as a transitional fuel for decarbonization" according to a UK daily.

    Reiner Füllmich: The pandemic is a global coup d’etat

    The famous lawyer Dr Reiner Füllmich speaks exclusively to Free West Media on the topic of the pandemic and the draconian measures that many countries have adopted, and how he and others will be challenging this in court.

    New evidence showing harmfulness of Corona vaccinations presented to International Criminal Court

    The HagueAn independent Dutch Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry set up in 2020, has new evidence it presented to the International Criminal Court in The Hague about the harmfulness of the Corona vaccinations.

    The effect of the vaccine is fading – more and more fully vaccinated people are dying from Covid-19

    StockholmA Swedish daily reported that more and more fully vaccinated people die from Covid-19 as more and more people vaccinated over time get such low antibody levels that the protection decreases.

    German Greens trip over their ‘gender as a speech act’ law

    Reutlingen David Allison applied as a member of the German Green party for a “women's seat” to make the absurdity of his party's trans politics clear. Allison, a research assistant, wanted to initiate a debate about gender as a "speech act" with his move. However, no debate was allowed on this issue and he was fired instead.

    Go to archive