British foreign secretary derided and mocked in Russia
When UK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss gave a speech against Russia and China to the Lowy Institute, a think tank funded by the Australian government, Rothschild and some commodities groups, it provoked derision and laughter in Russia.
Published: February 16, 2022, 9:10 am
The German weekly Der Spiegel, had dutifully praised the British Foreign Secretary’s speech under the headline “”Global aggressors” – London accuses Russia and China of campaign against democracy”. The speech contained the usual clichés: Russia and China are “global aggressors” on a “campaign against democracy”.
Of course, Britain promised to stand with Ukraine against the alleged “Russian troop build-up“.
Foreign Minister’s knowledge of history
In the speech text published by the British Foreign Office, there is the following paragraph in connection with the alleged imminent Russian attack on Ukraine:
“Ukraine is a proud country with a long history. It has seen invading powers before – from the Mongols to the Tartars. They have suffered from state-sponsored famine. Their resilience is deeply rooted. If need be, Ukrainians will fight to defend their country.”
This indeed sounds wonderful, but anyone with even the most rudimentary grasp of history would rub their eyes in wonder. Russia (Ukraine did not exist as a state or even a principality at that time) may have been overrun by the Mongols in its time, who penetrated as far as Europe in the Middle Ages, but the Tatars…?
Since Russia attaches great importance to education – also and especially historical education – the speech had a great resonance in Russia, even if it was not what the British Foreign Minister had in mind. Maria Zakharova, the spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry, reacted to the speech on Telegram.
“British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss, who recently rode through the Baltics in a tank, said today that Ukraine had experienced many invasions – ‘from the Mongols to the Tatars’.”
Some questions from her Russian colleagues were put to the British diplomat: “How many years have passed between the two invasions, of the Mongols and the Tatars?” and “What educational institution did Ms Truss graduate from?”
How are Western politicians to be taken seriously when they so openly and proudly display their ignorance and lack of education that their speeches on international crises elicit not respect or thoughtfulness but laughter from their counterparts?
At the beginning of the month, Truss once again made a fool of herself with a speech in which she confused the Russian regions of Rostov and Voronezh as being part of Ukraine. Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov was thus subjected to negotiations with this warmongering ignoramus who had accused Russia of deploying troops on the “Ukrainian border”, without her knowing which areas are on that border.
The Russian foreign minister, a career diplomat with many decades of experience, said the meeting could have been broadcast live on television because absolutely nothing was said beyond the usual British slogans. But he added that he had never experienced a meeting like this before.
Lavrov described the talks succinctly as “a conversation between a mute and a deaf”. According to the newspaper Kommersant, when it came to the stationing of Russian troops in the Rostov and Voronezh regions, Liz Truss suddenly announced that London would never recognize these regions as sovereign Russian territories.
PR stunts in a fur hat
For Truss, posing on the Red Square in a fur hat in warm weather was much more important than delivering content: Wearing a fur hat à la Russe, the head of the Foreign Office laid flowers at the grave of the Unknown Soldier. The day before, Elizabeth Truss had strolled through Red Square in the same look. Before the meeting at the Foreign Ministry, the British minister also visited Moscow State University, pretending to want to “improve” relations.
“Our embassy in Moscow is now trying to strengthen ties in areas such as science, mathematics and culture, but strengthening these ties will depend on improving overall Russia-Britain relations,” Truss said.
But during the meeting Truss resorted to threats instead: “A war in Ukraine would be a catastrophe for the Russian and Ukrainian people and for European security. NATO has made it clear that war will have consequences and cause great casualties.”
When Truss spoke about the withdrawal of Russian forces from the border, Lavrov categorically stated that Russian troops could move freely on Russian territory. Then he quipped: “You recognize Russia’s sovereignty over the Rostov and Voronezh regions, don’t you?”
After a brief pause, the oblivious Truss declared that her country would never recognize Russia’s sovereignty over these regions. Deborah Bonnert, the British ambassador to Russia, had to intervene and patiently explained to Truss that these were indeed Russian regions and had nothing to do with Ukraine.
“It’s kind of like Russia waiting for the ground to freeze and turn to stone so tanks can safely enter Ukrainian territory. That seems to me to be the attitude of our British colleagues today, from which the numerous facts that we presented today rebounded,” Lavrov said.
Truss showed the same level of education about the Minsk agreements as for the Baltic states, “on the Black Sea”. She said Russia should implement the ceasefire agreement, despite the fact that Russia is not a party to the conflict. The diplomat also failed to answer the question of why the Chechen separatists who carried out terrorist attacks were supported by Britain, while the Donbass rebels were not.
Beating war drums
Truss also refused to dispute the leak in her Foreign Office that London was running a whole program to “undermine Russian influence”, essentially confirming the information.
The British Defence Secretary Ben Wallace and the chief of the Defence Staff, Admiral Sir Antony Radakin, also flew to Moscow, and The Times issued their warning: “The defence secretary will fly to Moscow today with a new package of sanctions in an attempt to persuade the Kremlin to step back from the brink of war.”
Twitter has shaped a generation of politicians with short attention spans, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said when commenting on British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss’ visit. “Accustomed to expressing themselves in 140-character tweets, the new politicians believe that the entire situation surrounding Ukraine can be captured in two or three tweets, if not just one. That is why the Tatar-Mongols at Truss invaded medieval Ukraine with such crazy ease, Rostov and Voronezh left Russia, and the Baltic States are on the Black Sea.”
The Budapest Memorandum, an agreement signed in 1994 under which Ukraine renounced nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees from the signatory parties, was signed by four countries: Ukraine, Russia, The US and Great Britain.
The implementation of the treaty gives the West a legal basis for intervention and the possibility of organizing a full-fledged military presence in the country, bypassing the NATO charter. The US and UK have relied on this agreement to deploy their troops in Ukraine in an effort to provoke a war.
All rights reserved. You have permission to quote freely from the articles provided that the source (www.freewestmedia.com) is given. Photos may not be used without our consent.
Consider donating to support our work
Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.
Keep your language polite. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in, for example, Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.
If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violations of any law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.
If your comments are subject to preview by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.
We reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.
CLIMATEThe United States' government scientific organization, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), predicts zero sunspots from 2031 to 2040. This is an extreme situation that has not occurred in as long as humanity has been counting sunspots, and it leads us into uncharted territory in terms of our solar system. However, this prediction aligns with the warnings of the world-renowned solar researcher Valentina Zharkova for many years, who indicated in 2019 various signs of this catastrophic phenomenon, including the extreme hailstorms we have seen in Europe and the world this summer. The forecast and various observations this year give cause for very significant concern. In this unique analysis, Free West Media explains why.
EUROPEAN ELECTIONSOn Saturday, August 26, representatives of six European nationalist parties gathered in Budapest. The meeting was initiated by the Hungarian party Mi Hazánk and took place in the national parliament. Representatives of the parties signed a joint declaration that not only reaffirms the parties' friendship but also their unity on a range of complex political issues. A surprisingly clear and radical manifesto was established. The hope is that this cooperation will lead to success in the EU elections and eventually result in the formation of a group in the European Parliament. For Swedish nationalism, this meeting marks a success as Sweden, for the first time, has a party represented in a leading nationalist cooperation in Europe. Free West Media was present at this historic event.
Sweden will have to wait a bit longer for NATO membership, according to Turkey's Justice Minister Jilmaz Tunc. First, Sweden must extradite the "terrorists" Turkey wants and stop the desecration of the Quran.
The Russian attack helicopter Ka-52 is considered one of the world's best and has struck fear in Ukraine, where it has hunted down tanks and other armored vehicles, often beyond the range of many light anti-aircraft systems. However, it has met its match in the Swedish air defense missile system RBS 70, which has quickly led to significant losses for the Russian helicopter forces.
Alternative for Germany (AfD) held a party conference on July 29-30 to select candidates for the upcoming EU election next year. EU Parliament member Maximilian Krah, belonging to the party's more radical, ethnonationalist faction, was appointed as the top candidate. The party's two spokespersons delivered powerful speeches criticizing the EU's failed migration policy and trade sanctions that isolate Europe and Germany from the rest of the world. They argued that it's time for the EU to return a significant portion of its power to national parliaments. However, they have dropped the demand for Germany to exit the EU.
The rising popularity of AfD has raised strong concerns within the establishment. Despite lies and demonization in the media and isolation from the overall political establishment, the party continues to grow. Certain representatives of the party are accused of becoming increasingly "extreme," and in an unusual move, the influential weekly newspaper Der Spiegel demanded that AfD be "banned."
What is happening in the Netherlands? It is often difficult to follow events in other countries, especially when distorted by system media. We give Forum for Democracy (FvD) the opportunity to speak out on the political situation in the Netherlands and the staunch resistance they face in trying to save the country.
After a criminal complaint in Belgium against the President of the European Commission, the so-called SMS-case, now takes a new turn. The judge responsible for the investigation will likely gain access to the secret messages exchanged between Ursula von der Leyen and Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, at least if they haven't been deleted.
Arktos has distinguished itself by publishing groundbreaking philosophers and social critics. Now, the publisher's international distributor has abruptly terminated the cooperation, and more than 400 already printed titles cannot reach their audience. There is strong evidence that the distributor has been under pressure, something that has also happened in Sweden. We have spoken with Arktos founder Daniel Friberg about the ongoing struggle for freedom of speech in a shrinking cultural corridor.
The Catholic bishops of the Scandinavian countries presented an open five-page letter criticizing transgender ideology on March 21, just before Easter. The document primarily expresses care and advice and was read aloud in Catholic churches in Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland. Cardinal Anders Arborelius, Bishop of Stockholm, is one of the signatories of the document.