Skip to Content

‘Consensus’ on climate science takes a hit in 2017

Climate change research for 2017 revealed that the alleged "consensus'" on the so-called dangers of anthropogenic global warming has not yet been established as far as all climate scientists are concerned.

Published: January 11, 2018, 10:38 am

    Read more

    Author Kenneth Richard looked into research conducted in 2017, and found that at least 485 scientific papers were published that in some way questioned the supposed consensus.

    These papers questioned the human contribution to CO2 emissions or the efficacy of climate models to predict the future and showed that significant limitations and uncertainties remain.

    According to Richard’s analysis, the 485 new papers highlight “significant limitations and uncertainties inherent in our understanding of climate and climate changes,” suggesting that climate science is not as clear as media reports and climate activists would have people believe.

    More specifically, the papers support the four main skeptical positions which question climate alarm.

    They suggest that natural mechanisms play well more than a negligible role as claimed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the net changes in the climate system, which includes temperature variations, precipitation patterns, weather events, etc.

    The IPCC is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change. It was established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in 1988 to provide the world with a clear scientific view.

    The IPCC position is that natural mechanisms would have caused a slight cooling in the recent past. Instead it warmed significantly. The best current explanation is the forcing from GHGs such as CO2, but this doesn’t mean that the Sun has no influence.

    The IPCC claimed that the Himalayan glaciers would “disappear” by 2035.  The reality is that a recent study indicated they were predominantly stable with very little melting.

    The influence of increased CO2 concentrations on climatic changes, they maintain, are less pronounced than currently imagined.

    Warming, sea levels, glacier movement and sea ice retreat or hurricane and drought intensities are neither unprecedented or remarkable, nor do they fall outside the range of natural variability.

    Computer climate models are not reliable or consistently accurate, and projections of future climate states are little more than speculation as the uncertainty and error ranges are enormous in a non-linear climate system.

    There may be an actual consensus on the existence of the greenhouse gas effect, something that can be experimentally demonstrated, but elevated CO2 and a warmer climate provide unheralded benefits to the biosphere, including for enhanced crop yields.

    Current emissions-mitigation policies, especially related to the advocacy for renewables, are often ineffective and even harmful to the environment, some argue.

    Large regions of the Earth, including much of the Southern Hemisphere, has not warmed in decades, and this should not be happening with well-mixed greenhouse gases.

    The Southern Ocean been cooling since 1979, and not one of the “consensus” climate scientists has named the mechanism for the cooling and increased sea ice extent, Richard has noted.

    “Most of the Southern Hemisphere and even almost half of the Northern Hemisphere have been cooling for the last few decades. The warming has not been global in scale,” he pointed out.

    The “consensus” positions are that close to or over 100 percent of the warming since 1950 has been caused by increases in anthropogenic CO2 emissions, leaving natural attribution at something close to zero.

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    Americas

    Majority of Americans believe Biden is just a frontman

    WashingtonWho is really in charge of the United States? Most believe the geriatric leader President Joe Biden is not really the Commander in Chief of his country.

    G7 summit: Doddering Biden confuses Syria and Libya three times

    NewquayJoe Biden's latest painful slip of the tongue is again eliciting much speculation about his mental health. In a speech at the G7 summit, he confused the countries Syria and Libya. Before that he aimlessly wandered into a café appearing disorientated before his wife arrived and dragged him off.

    Third night of unrest in Minneapolis after black fugitive’s death

    Minneapolis A young black man named Winston “Boogie” Smith was shot and killed during an attempt by US Marshals to arrest him on a felony firearms warrant in a parking garage in the Uptown district of Minneapolis. No Minneapolis police were involved in the incident, yet rioters took to the streets, looting and demanding "justice" and attacking whites. Slogans to kill the police were spotted on the streets.

    Pfizer/BioNTech animal trials show dangerous concentrations of nano-particles in organs

    BerlinIn Japan, upon request under the Freedom of Information Act, the licensing authority published previously inaccessible animal test data on the mRNA vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech. The data show that the mRNA nanoparticles do not remain at the point of injection in the muscle tissue, as claimed by the manufacturers, but in many cases reach the organs in high concentrations. RT DE asked the German Ministry of Health about its assessment at the federal press conference.

    Covid ‘vaccine’ exposed as huge risk at major health conference in US

    CaliforniaDoctor Christiane Northrup is adamant: The so-called anti-Covid injections are not vaccines. On April 16-17, a very well-attended two-day conference was held in the USA called the Health & Freedom Conference 2021, in which several well-known people participated. The mainstream media has not reproduced a single word that was said.

    US employers may be held liable for vaccine damage if they mandate Covid jabs

    The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has warned American employers that they may be held liable for "any adverse reactions" if they force employees to take Covid-19 vaccines "as a condition of their employment".

    Biden Executive Order strips Americans of all rights if they ‘get involved’ with Russia

    WashingtonPresident Biden signed an executive order in April to allow his administration to "deprive American citizens and organizations of their rights and property by arbitrarily linking those persons to real, imagined, or vaguely defined activities of the Russian government," according to a report in a conservative American publication.

    Majority of US voters believe the 2020 presidential election was rigged

    President Joe Biden cheated to get elected to the White House: a Rassmussen poll revealed that 51 percent of American voters share the belief that the election was rigged.

    Swiss epidemiologist warns against US Covid vaccination strategy as only option

    GenevaSwiss epidemiologist Antoine Flahault warned of the risks of the strategy focused on vaccination with current vaccines alone as a solution. He cited the example of the United States.

    WEF involved in non-white manufacturers displaying new shelf labelling

    It seems to be part of the globalist agenda where the World Economic Forum once again appears in the background after a large food chain in the United States joined the Woke movement, now rolling over the declining superpower like an unstoppable steamroller. Labels such as "black-owned", "Latin-owned", "LGBTQ-owned" and so on is being displayed to encourage customers to buy these at the expense of "white-owned" companies.

    Go to archive