Expensive and unrealistic EU plan to stop the import of Russian energy
The European Commission has now issued information on how it intends to stop the import of energy from Russia. Among other things, they want to produce more "renewable" electricity and biogas in the EU countries, increase the number of heat pumps and increase energy efficiency in general. Nuclear power is not included in the plan.
Published: June 11, 2022, 1:54 pm
Olle Felten, a former member of the Swedish Riksdag’s tax committee and the Riksbank’s General Council, remains unconvinced that the EU has a realistic vision for energy. He explains in detail why the EU is shortsighted.
The proposal also contains preparations for rationing natural gas, but has been given the “positive” name “REPowerEU”. The Commission claims that the measures will make energy cheaper in Europe, which has been met with great skepticism. The schedule has also generally been ruled unrealistic.
On 18 May, the European Commission presented a proposal for a project to end the EU’s dependence on Russian energy, with the aim of the EU becoming independent of Russian natural gas by 2030. The aim of the project is to create “joint European measures for safer and more sustainable energy at a more affordable price”.
The measures in “REPowerEU” are about:
• saving energy
• producing clean energy
• diversifying the energy supply
They simply want to build a new energy infrastructure at record speed, “The new energy system that Europe needs”. It is believed that the plan is a response to “The difficulties and the global energy market disruption caused by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine”. However, it is not possible to show how the alternative will be “more affordable in price” than cheap Russian gas.
As many of the EU countries have built large parts of their energy supply on natural gas, stopping imports is a major challenge. In 2021, about 155 billion cubic meters of gas were imported from Russia. The most extreme measure in the project is to reduce it by two thirds, or 100 billion cubic meters, in just one year. This will be done through the Member States of the Union being expected to invest in replacement production, streamline and reduce consumption, and find new suppliers of large quantities of natural gas, which normally means price increases.
In addition, there are already major commitments that require a comprehensive expansion of electricity production, such as fossil-free steel, the cement industry’s carbon dioxide plan, electrification of the transport sector and other energy-consuming projects.
The mix of intended measures in “REPowerEU” is presented overall, with seven different blocks that deal with different measures and how much money to spend on each part. The text emphasizes that it must go fast – EUR 210 billion must be spent before 2027. The fact that it is the citizens of the EU Member States who have to pay the final bill is not a big issue in the Commission’s project advertisement either.
Nuclear power is not included in the current plans at all. It would have been possible for the European Commission to point the whole hand at Germany to force them to use the nuclear power they have to achieve their goal. But even this pointer is missing in the information about the Commission’s plans, which is a surprising fact because Germany is one of the EU countries that has the greatest need for, for example, Russian gas.
In the short term, i.e. in this current year, the European Commission proposes joint purchases of gas and rapid expansion of solar and wind energy with the goal of saving about 50 billion cubic meters of gas imports.
It wants to increase biomethane production to replace 17 billion cubic meters of gas imports. Savings and efficiency will save 13 billion cubic meters.
At the same time, a first EU-wide hydrogen project will be launched, which in itself requires a lot of energy. Hydrogen is produced by breaking down water molecules into oxygen and hydrogen using electricity.
It also aims to replenish European natural gas stocks quickly before the autumn, before phasing out Russia’s imports – at least 80 percent by 1 November. Another measure, described as “EU-coordinated plans to reduce demand in the event of a gas supply disruption”, involves planning for a situation that can not be described in any other way than rationing natural gas, albeit orderly.
The production of biomethane requires energy
A large part of the investment, EUR 37 billion by 2030, will be spent on new production of biogas, “biomethane”. Methane is produced from residual products from mainly agriculture (for example manure from livestock farming), forestry, treatment plants and slaughterhouses as a basic raw material. Increasingly high production targets tend to instead require a larger share of raw material on cultivated land.
The industry believes that this can happen “without conflict with food production”. Analysts believe, however, that it is not possible to achieve the set goal for production without using arable land to produce energy crops for gas production. Large areas are also already used for the production of raw materials for biodiesel.
An interesting aspect of biomethane production, however, is that one can get a lot of gas out of livestock manure. This would mean that it would be possible to increase the breeding of meat animals considerably and use the manure for gas production. The criticism from a globalist point of view of animal husbandry as a major producer of “climate gases” would be turned into a positive factor for energy production. However, this reasoning is not included in the European Commission’s project description. Instead, the plans for a drastic reduction of Europe’s animal population “for the sake of the climate” remain.
The European Commission writes in its presentation of the ambitious plan that the goal of reducing the use of natural gas in the EU to 155 billion cubic meters should be reached by 2030. Then they have also merged a previously extremely ambitious plan, which goes under the name “Fit for 55” with a number of new measures within “REPowerEU”. At the same time, it is said that savings and other energy sources must be able to reach as much as two thirds of that goal, or 100 billion cubic meters, within a year, i.e. 2023.
However, the whole presentation of “REPowerEU” is very incoherent. A document entitled “Financing REPowerEU” foresees projects funded to the tune of €210 billion by 2027. In the same presentation, lined-up projects are estimated at €288 billion by 2030 and in another part of the jumbled description, the amount mentioned is €225 billion. The previously launched “Recovery Fund (RRF)” will be available to Member States. It had been set up to help boost the economy following the Corona pandemic’s restrictions and closures.
Obviously, there is money left in the planned “fund”, which is not needed for the original purpose and thus can be used for other purposes.
The strange thing about that reasoning is that the more than 800 billion euros that the RRF covers were marketed as absolutely crucial for the EU countries to be able to avoid collapsing after the Covid pandemic. The fact that it is now claimed that there is just over 200 billion euros, or about a quarter, left to advance the independence of EU countries from Russian energy, should make the most ardent EU supporter wonder about how the Commission handles citizens’ money.
It is not very clear how much it will actually cost the peoples of the EU countries to avoid Russian energy. There are no clear figures in the hastily put forward plans to reduce natural gas imports to just one third of imports by 2021 within a year. This may be because they themselves do not believe it is possible.
It could become particularly difficult when the consequences of such a strategy become apparent to the populations of the various Member States and when politicians begin to fully realize what the economic aftermath will be.
All rights reserved. You have permission to quote freely from the articles provided that the source (www.freewestmedia.com) is given. Photos may not be used without our consent.
Consider donating to support our work
Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.
Keep your language polite. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in, for example, Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.
If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violations of any law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.
If your comments are subject to preview by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.
We reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.
CLIMATEThe United States' government scientific organization, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), predicts zero sunspots from 2031 to 2040. This is an extreme situation that has not occurred in as long as humanity has been counting sunspots, and it leads us into uncharted territory in terms of our solar system. However, this prediction aligns with the warnings of the world-renowned solar researcher Valentina Zharkova for many years, who indicated in 2019 various signs of this catastrophic phenomenon, including the extreme hailstorms we have seen in Europe and the world this summer. The forecast and various observations this year give cause for very significant concern. In this unique analysis, Free West Media explains why.
EUROPEAN ELECTIONSOn Saturday, August 26, representatives of six European nationalist parties gathered in Budapest. The meeting was initiated by the Hungarian party Mi Hazánk and took place in the national parliament. Representatives of the parties signed a joint declaration that not only reaffirms the parties' friendship but also their unity on a range of complex political issues. A surprisingly clear and radical manifesto was established. The hope is that this cooperation will lead to success in the EU elections and eventually result in the formation of a group in the European Parliament. For Swedish nationalism, this meeting marks a success as Sweden, for the first time, has a party represented in a leading nationalist cooperation in Europe. Free West Media was present at this historic event.
Sweden will have to wait a bit longer for NATO membership, according to Turkey's Justice Minister Jilmaz Tunc. First, Sweden must extradite the "terrorists" Turkey wants and stop the desecration of the Quran.
The Russian attack helicopter Ka-52 is considered one of the world's best and has struck fear in Ukraine, where it has hunted down tanks and other armored vehicles, often beyond the range of many light anti-aircraft systems. However, it has met its match in the Swedish air defense missile system RBS 70, which has quickly led to significant losses for the Russian helicopter forces.
Alternative for Germany (AfD) held a party conference on July 29-30 to select candidates for the upcoming EU election next year. EU Parliament member Maximilian Krah, belonging to the party's more radical, ethnonationalist faction, was appointed as the top candidate. The party's two spokespersons delivered powerful speeches criticizing the EU's failed migration policy and trade sanctions that isolate Europe and Germany from the rest of the world. They argued that it's time for the EU to return a significant portion of its power to national parliaments. However, they have dropped the demand for Germany to exit the EU.
The rising popularity of AfD has raised strong concerns within the establishment. Despite lies and demonization in the media and isolation from the overall political establishment, the party continues to grow. Certain representatives of the party are accused of becoming increasingly "extreme," and in an unusual move, the influential weekly newspaper Der Spiegel demanded that AfD be "banned."
What is happening in the Netherlands? It is often difficult to follow events in other countries, especially when distorted by system media. We give Forum for Democracy (FvD) the opportunity to speak out on the political situation in the Netherlands and the staunch resistance they face in trying to save the country.
After a criminal complaint in Belgium against the President of the European Commission, the so-called SMS-case, now takes a new turn. The judge responsible for the investigation will likely gain access to the secret messages exchanged between Ursula von der Leyen and Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, at least if they haven't been deleted.
Arktos has distinguished itself by publishing groundbreaking philosophers and social critics. Now, the publisher's international distributor has abruptly terminated the cooperation, and more than 400 already printed titles cannot reach their audience. There is strong evidence that the distributor has been under pressure, something that has also happened in Sweden. We have spoken with Arktos founder Daniel Friberg about the ongoing struggle for freedom of speech in a shrinking cultural corridor.
The Catholic bishops of the Scandinavian countries presented an open five-page letter criticizing transgender ideology on March 21, just before Easter. The document primarily expresses care and advice and was read aloud in Catholic churches in Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland. Cardinal Anders Arborelius, Bishop of Stockholm, is one of the signatories of the document.