Skip to Content

Chamber of the Swiss National Council. Wikipedia
Bern

After failed referendum Swiss anti-immigration party fears EU takeover

After a failed sovereignist referendum in Switzerland on the encroaching powers of Brussels, the largest party in the Swiss parliament warns that the country is now facing a "massive erosion" of their unique democracy.

Published: December 2, 2018, 6:48 am

    Read more

    A long-running dispute over the EU’s “Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons” have been brewing between Switzerland and the EU. The agreement, signed in June 1999, allows EU citizens to live and work in Switzerland, and vice versa.

    In November 2010 Swiss voters approved a referendum to deport foreigners who commit serious crimes in Switzerland.

    Switzerland has more than 120 bilateral agreements that govern its relations with the European Union. It has gained access to the European single market by inking various such agreements that include control over its boundaries and immigration.

    But according to the EU, deporting EU citizens for any reason – even crime – is seen to be a violation of Switzerland’s treaty obligations. The Swiss parliament, seeking to avoid economic reprisals, then watered down their law to please the EU.

    Thus, in February 2014, when Swiss voters approved a referendum to reintroduce quotas for immigration from EU countries, the EU warned that any restrictions on access to the Swiss labor market would violate the agreement on the freedom of movement of persons, and threatened “serious consequences”.

    Supporters of the quotas for foreigners argued that foreign workers were driving down wages and inflating demand for housing, health, education and transport, but the Swiss parliament eventually ignored voters’ concerns after being pressured by Brussels.

    The EU has been increasing their demands on Switzerland to keep its borders open, making the recognition of Switzerland’s SIX Swiss Exchange, the fourth-largest stock market in Europe, contingent on Swiss acceptance of the EU framework agreement on free movement.

    Switzerland’s current stock exchange agreement with the EU expires at the end of the year and failure to renew it would deprive the Swiss exchange of EU-based business that generates more than half its volume.

    Bloomberg News noted the dilemma facing Swiss business leaders: “The Swiss government now faces the prospect of choosing between two evils: agree to the EU framework deal only to have it torpedoed by voters in a referendum, or renege on the treaty and risk reprisals from Brussels that hurt the economy.”

    The EU has also been insisting on an even more comprehensive “framework agreement”, including greater powers for the European Court of Justice (ECJ). If Switzerland agrees, the ECJ would outrank the Swiss Supreme Court as the final arbiter of legal disputes in the country.

    The Swiss People’s Party (SVP) is worried about the encroaching EU meddling: “The SVP rejects a one-sided submission to EU institutions, aimed at establishing an institutional connection of Switzerland to the EU apparatus, with a dynamic EU legal takeover and, ultimately, the subordination of Switzerland to the EU Court of Justice. A dynamic adoption of EU law would be another massive erosion of our direct democracy.”

    In February 2018, Swiss public television SRF reported that the European Commission handed over a 19-page “sin list” of “Swiss violations of EU law” to the government.

    But despite EU pressure or perhaps because of it, Swiss voters rejected the recent referendum on the “self-determination” initiative, put forward by the eurosceptic SVP, the largest party in the Swiss parliament. Two-thirds (66.2 percent) of voters in the November 25 referendum opposed the SVP initiative.

    SVP leaders had argued that the new law was necessary to safeguard national sovereignty from further encroachment by supranational organisations such as the European Union and the United Nations, but the measure was attacked by a coalition of Swiss business groups.

    According to them, access to international markets for the export-dependent country is paramount. “Ultimately, it is about maintaining prosperity in Switzerland and keeping the companies and jobs here,” said Monika Rühl, director of the business group Economiesuisse.

    The proposal’s defeat comes ahead of pending decisions by the Swiss government over whether to sign the controversial UN Migration Compact.

    The sponsor of the sovereignist referendum proposal, SVP MP Hans-Ueli Vogt, expressed surprise at the scale of the defeat — a rare setback for the SVP, one of the most successful anti-EU parties in Europe — but said he would continue to fight against “creeping EU accession”.

    SVP MP Adrian Amstutz has warned that the Swiss parliament’s new deportation law would become worthless if the country signs away its independence to the Brussels. “According to the parliament’s implementation of the law for the deportation initiative, courts would have the possibility to put aside a deportation — even in the case of the most serious offenses — via the hardship clause. Current legal practices show that judges would frequently make use of this option. As a consequence, hardly any foreign criminals would be deported.”

    Christoph Blocher in 2010 as an honorary guest at the Swiss National Trachtenfest (folk costume festival) in Schwyz. Wikipedia

    In November 2014 already, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) prohibited Switzerland from sending Afghan asylum seekers back to Italy. Although Italian authorities had agreed to take them back, the ECHR ruled that doing so would violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Prohibition of Inhuman and Degrading Treatments) because of overcrowding and poor conditions at Italian asylum facilities.

    SVP leader Christoph Blocher criticized the ECHR for ignoring the principle of subsidiarity, which holds that decisions should be taken, if possible, at the local level: “Don’t we trust federal judges to decide on human rights issues? We had those principles written into our constitution well before the ECHR. The problem with the convention is that it decides things from far away. The consequences, what happens next, don’t concern the judges.”

    Martin Schubarth, a former Swiss federal judge, said the ECHR had acted in an undemocratic way. “It is unacceptable that a small panel of [ECHR] judges, who generally lack the expert knowledge about the [Swiss] legislative authority, handle matters in an undemocratic way instead of the [Swiss] authority itself.”

    La Liberté, a newspaper based in Fribourg echoed his concerns: “The object of the initiative was very legitimate: it was about national sovereignty and its relationship with international law in a globalized world.”

    The Geneva-based L’Express reported that the failure of the SVP referendum does not bode well for future legal wrangles: “The SVP suffered a defeat because it failed to mobilize and convince beyond its base. The voters wanted a pragmatic assessment between international law and national law. Depending on the situation, one or the other should apply. The definitive prevalence of one over the other, on the other hand, is not shared by the majority.”

    La Tribune de Genève commented: “What the Swiss have supported this Sunday is a pragmatic, negotiated, piecemeal approach to our national interests. Voting is in no way a declaration of love to a European Union in crisis.”

    The Swiss People’s Party said that despite the loss, the referendum “brought a welcome and suppressed debate about the relationship between Swiss law and international law and the importance of direct democracy.

    “First of all, the SVP demands that Switzerland not join the UN migration pact. We are counting on the pledges of the representatives of the other parties, that at the very least it is presented to the parliament with the aim of holding a referendum on the matter, so that Swiss voters can have their say about such a far-reaching pact.

    “Secondly, the SVP rejects a one-sided submission to EU institutions, aimed at establishing an institutional connection of Switzerland to the EU apparatus, with a dynamic EU legal takeover and, ultimately, the subordination of Switzerland to the EU Court of Justice. A dynamic adoption of EU law would be another massive erosion of our direct democracy.”

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    Europe

    Spain: Law allows geoengineering experiments

    MadridOver 50 countries are currently carrying out "activities to artificially change the weather", explained the Spanish weather agency AEMET and speaks of "chemical contrails" or "chemtrails".

    Dutch farmers plan fresh protests as nitrogen ‘science’ is called into question

    ColomboThe Dutch farmers' movement Agractie has called on its supporters to stage new protest actions. Erik Luiten, one of the leaders of the movement, said in a video message that such actions could include organising standstills at busy places. The farmers' movement is massively supported by citizens.

    German media ignore the growing AfD elephant in the room

    BerlinThe current reporting in the German mainstream press is surprisingly calm if one looks at the current poll numbers of the various parties. If any loss of percentage points is otherwise celebrated when it concerns the AfD, there is now total silence from mainstream parties.

    Soros turns to Austria to prepare regime change in Belarus

    ViennaBelarusian exiles are being trained at the Diplomatic Academy in Vienna – quietly and secretly. The dubious programme is funded by Alexander Schallenberg (ÖVP) from the Austrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    ‘Western elites will not survive the Ukraine conflict’

    MoscowIn a recent interview, the Russian geopolitician and long-time presidential adviser Sergei Karaganov made a comprehensive assessment of the Ukraine conflict and also spoke about possible future scenarios.

    German AfD politician believes Alternative for Sweden has great future potential

    StockholmStefan Korte, active in the nationalist party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in the state of Brandenburg, participated as a guest speaker at the AfS' election campaign on August 6.

    Giorgia Meloni calls for a naval blockade off Libya

    RomeLike every summer, a massive influx of asylum seekers is spurring on the political discussion in Italy. And the issue is once again grist to the mills of the right-wing opposition. Just a few years ago, Matteo Salvini, then Interior Minister of the Lega, was able to count on the approval of an overwhelming majority of Italians for his rigid measures against illegal immigration.

    Ukrainian human trafficking ring with newborns exposed

    PragueA Czech media portal has uncovered further mafia structures linked to Ukraine. This case is about human trafficking of newborns and outright surrogacy slavery. At least 30 babies have been illegally sold to foreigners in the Czech Republic since 2019 after they were born in Prague by Ukrainian surrogate mothers.

    French PM announces appointment of ‘ambassador for LGBT + rights’

    ParisThe French Prime Minister has warned: "The battle of mentalities is not yet won." Élisabeth Borne announced on Thursday, August 4 that an "ambassador for LGBT + rights" would be appointed "before the end of the year" and that a fund of 3 million euros would be created to finance new LGBT + centers.

    Monsanto and BlackRock are buying up Ukraine

    KievUkraine is being sold off. The mendacious Western struggle for the "soul of Ukraine" is actually for the monopolies, Monsanto, Vanguard and BlackRock - to pick the country apart.

    Go to archive