Skip to Content

Chamber of the Swiss National Council. Wikipedia
Bern

After failed referendum Swiss anti-immigration party fears EU takeover

After a failed sovereignist referendum in Switzerland on the encroaching powers of Brussels, the largest party in the Swiss parliament warns that the country is now facing a "massive erosion" of their unique democracy.

Published: December 2, 2018, 6:48 am

    Read more

    A long-running dispute over the EU’s “Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons” have been brewing between Switzerland and the EU. The agreement, signed in June 1999, allows EU citizens to live and work in Switzerland, and vice versa.

    In November 2010 Swiss voters approved a referendum to deport foreigners who commit serious crimes in Switzerland.

    Switzerland has more than 120 bilateral agreements that govern its relations with the European Union. It has gained access to the European single market by inking various such agreements that include control over its boundaries and immigration.

    But according to the EU, deporting EU citizens for any reason – even crime – is seen to be a violation of Switzerland’s treaty obligations. The Swiss parliament, seeking to avoid economic reprisals, then watered down their law to please the EU.

    Thus, in February 2014, when Swiss voters approved a referendum to reintroduce quotas for immigration from EU countries, the EU warned that any restrictions on access to the Swiss labor market would violate the agreement on the freedom of movement of persons, and threatened “serious consequences”.

    Supporters of the quotas for foreigners argued that foreign workers were driving down wages and inflating demand for housing, health, education and transport, but the Swiss parliament eventually ignored voters’ concerns after being pressured by Brussels.

    The EU has been increasing their demands on Switzerland to keep its borders open, making the recognition of Switzerland’s SIX Swiss Exchange, the fourth-largest stock market in Europe, contingent on Swiss acceptance of the EU framework agreement on free movement.

    Switzerland’s current stock exchange agreement with the EU expires at the end of the year and failure to renew it would deprive the Swiss exchange of EU-based business that generates more than half its volume.

    Bloomberg News noted the dilemma facing Swiss business leaders: “The Swiss government now faces the prospect of choosing between two evils: agree to the EU framework deal only to have it torpedoed by voters in a referendum, or renege on the treaty and risk reprisals from Brussels that hurt the economy.”

    The EU has also been insisting on an even more comprehensive “framework agreement”, including greater powers for the European Court of Justice (ECJ). If Switzerland agrees, the ECJ would outrank the Swiss Supreme Court as the final arbiter of legal disputes in the country.

    The Swiss People’s Party (SVP) is worried about the encroaching EU meddling: “The SVP rejects a one-sided submission to EU institutions, aimed at establishing an institutional connection of Switzerland to the EU apparatus, with a dynamic EU legal takeover and, ultimately, the subordination of Switzerland to the EU Court of Justice. A dynamic adoption of EU law would be another massive erosion of our direct democracy.”

    In February 2018, Swiss public television SRF reported that the European Commission handed over a 19-page “sin list” of “Swiss violations of EU law” to the government.

    But despite EU pressure or perhaps because of it, Swiss voters rejected the recent referendum on the “self-determination” initiative, put forward by the eurosceptic SVP, the largest party in the Swiss parliament. Two-thirds (66.2 percent) of voters in the November 25 referendum opposed the SVP initiative.

    SVP leaders had argued that the new law was necessary to safeguard national sovereignty from further encroachment by supranational organisations such as the European Union and the United Nations, but the measure was attacked by a coalition of Swiss business groups.

    According to them, access to international markets for the export-dependent country is paramount. “Ultimately, it is about maintaining prosperity in Switzerland and keeping the companies and jobs here,” said Monika Rühl, director of the business group Economiesuisse.

    The proposal’s defeat comes ahead of pending decisions by the Swiss government over whether to sign the controversial UN Migration Compact.

    The sponsor of the sovereignist referendum proposal, SVP MP Hans-Ueli Vogt, expressed surprise at the scale of the defeat — a rare setback for the SVP, one of the most successful anti-EU parties in Europe — but said he would continue to fight against “creeping EU accession”.

    SVP MP Adrian Amstutz has warned that the Swiss parliament’s new deportation law would become worthless if the country signs away its independence to the Brussels. “According to the parliament’s implementation of the law for the deportation initiative, courts would have the possibility to put aside a deportation — even in the case of the most serious offenses — via the hardship clause. Current legal practices show that judges would frequently make use of this option. As a consequence, hardly any foreign criminals would be deported.”

    Christoph Blocher in 2010 as an honorary guest at the Swiss National Trachtenfest (folk costume festival) in Schwyz. Wikipedia

    In November 2014 already, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) prohibited Switzerland from sending Afghan asylum seekers back to Italy. Although Italian authorities had agreed to take them back, the ECHR ruled that doing so would violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Prohibition of Inhuman and Degrading Treatments) because of overcrowding and poor conditions at Italian asylum facilities.

    SVP leader Christoph Blocher criticized the ECHR for ignoring the principle of subsidiarity, which holds that decisions should be taken, if possible, at the local level: “Don’t we trust federal judges to decide on human rights issues? We had those principles written into our constitution well before the ECHR. The problem with the convention is that it decides things from far away. The consequences, what happens next, don’t concern the judges.”

    Martin Schubarth, a former Swiss federal judge, said the ECHR had acted in an undemocratic way. “It is unacceptable that a small panel of [ECHR] judges, who generally lack the expert knowledge about the [Swiss] legislative authority, handle matters in an undemocratic way instead of the [Swiss] authority itself.”

    La Liberté, a newspaper based in Fribourg echoed his concerns: “The object of the initiative was very legitimate: it was about national sovereignty and its relationship with international law in a globalized world.”

    The Geneva-based L’Express reported that the failure of the SVP referendum does not bode well for future legal wrangles: “The SVP suffered a defeat because it failed to mobilize and convince beyond its base. The voters wanted a pragmatic assessment between international law and national law. Depending on the situation, one or the other should apply. The definitive prevalence of one over the other, on the other hand, is not shared by the majority.”

    La Tribune de Genève commented: “What the Swiss have supported this Sunday is a pragmatic, negotiated, piecemeal approach to our national interests. Voting is in no way a declaration of love to a European Union in crisis.”

    The Swiss People’s Party said that despite the loss, the referendum “brought a welcome and suppressed debate about the relationship between Swiss law and international law and the importance of direct democracy.

    “First of all, the SVP demands that Switzerland not join the UN migration pact. We are counting on the pledges of the representatives of the other parties, that at the very least it is presented to the parliament with the aim of holding a referendum on the matter, so that Swiss voters can have their say about such a far-reaching pact.

    “Secondly, the SVP rejects a one-sided submission to EU institutions, aimed at establishing an institutional connection of Switzerland to the EU apparatus, with a dynamic EU legal takeover and, ultimately, the subordination of Switzerland to the EU Court of Justice. A dynamic adoption of EU law would be another massive erosion of our direct democracy.”

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    • Dave Player

      The EU is a cancer. Switzerland is a wonderful place. Keep it that way.

    Europe

    Donbass: ‘The world needs to hear all sides’

    WashingtonFormer US diplomat Michael Springmann addressed the situation in Ukraine and Wednesday's online session of the UN Security Council where the foreign ministers of the two unrecognized republics of Donetsk and Lugansk got the opportunity to speak.

    FWM Live: UN Session with Donbass breakaway republics

    New YorkToday, an unprecedented event will be taking place at the site of the UN Security Council. For the first time since the start of the conflict in 2014, representatives of the breakaway republics of Donbass (Eastern Ukraine) will speak out directly to an audience of United Nations members.

    Sweden: Green EU candidate gets suspended sentence in worst school violence case ever

    SaltsjöbadenIn May last year, students at Samskolan in Saltsjöbaden, Sweden, were shocked when a black teacher assaulted a student, hitting him in the face and according to several witnesses even strangled him when he was on the ground. The teacher, from Africa, was a member of the municipal council for the Green Party as well as a candidate for the EU election in 2014.

    Unrecognized diplomacy: Donbass republics to speak at UN for the first time

    New YorkGermany is well known for its diplomatic work not just within the European Union but also as a mediator and coordinator in solving conflict and discord in other countries. German involvement in negotiations on the conflict in East Ukraine is of special interest, since Ukraine is a country which is located in the geographical center of Europe. It acts as the main official point of dissent between Russian and the West.

    Vienna jihadist targeted youth group

    ViennaAccording to the latest news from the investigation into the November 2 terrorist attack in Vienna, Kujtim Fejzulai, the ISIS jihadist who had carried out the attack, intended (but failed) to cause carnage during the prayer service of a youth group in a Catholic church.

    Everything in the EU is being done for the benefit of migrants

    BrusselsIn a speech given in the European Parliament by Silvia Sardone, an Italian MEP for the League Party, she said Europe’s priority remains focused on migrants: Housing and jobs for those who illegally disembark in the EU.

    The elephant in the room: The deadly flu epidemic of 2017/2018

    Covid-19 is undoubtedly a dangerous virus from which the aged with previous illnesses as well as younger people can die in exceptional cases. But the coercive measures ordered by globalist politicians in Europe override the basic rights of citizens, ruin the economy and by extension the livelihoods of large swathes of the population.

    ‘Identitarians are patriots who defend their country in a very hostile environment’

    ParisOn a daily news analysis programme of the French television channel CNews, commentator Eric Zemmour described the Identitarian movement as a heroic patriotic group. "The Identitarians are patriots who defend their country valiantly and in a very hostile environment." FWM provides some background on the raging debates in the country.

    Protests against strict new Covid measures seen across Europe

    CopenhagenThe Danish parliament was besieged by protesters for nine days in opposition to the proposed “vaccination law”, which would allow the police to “physically coerce vaccination through detainment”. These new “emergency powers” alongside new lockdown measures, have led to various protests across Europe.

    Two French Catholic schools on high alert after jihadist threats

    Le BouscatSeveral colleges in the small town of Bouscat in Gironde have been the target of jihadist threats, for the second time in a week.

    Go to archive