Skip to Content

Stock photo from Pixabay

Covid-19 vaccines: Saving three lives while putting two at risk

The mRNA vaccinations against Covid-19 are seen worldwide as the ultimate saviour to overcome the health crisis. So far, the surprisingly quick approvals by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have been provisional and are only so-called “conditional approvals”, as there is still too little data on the safety of this vaccine.

Published: June 28, 2021, 10:00 am

    Read more

    A peer-reviewed study published online in the journal Vaccines on June 24, 2021 sheds light on this.

    Harald Walach, visiting professor at the University of Witten /Herdecke and professor at the children’s clinic at the Medical University of Poznan, Rainer Klement, medical physicist from the Leopoldina Hospital in Schweinfurt, and Wouter Aukema, an independent data analyst from Holland, took the data from the EMA and the Dutch Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb under the microscope.

    They offset this against the results of a large Israeli field study that examined the effectiveness of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in more than one million people, as well as the results of the approval studies. According to this, the potential for side effects of the vaccinations is alarmingly high: The Dutch health authorities registered 4,11 deaths with every 100 000 vaccinations, around 700 people suffered side effects for every 100 000 vaccinations, 16 of which were severe.

    “That might be high, but acceptable costs, if the vaccinations could save a lot more lives, but the problem is that the high effectiveness of the vaccination, which has undoubtedly been proven, is only a relative effectiveness,” says Wallach. Nobody looks at the absolute effectiveness, i.e. the clinical effectiveness, according to the doctor. What is meant is the so-called “absolute difference in effectiveness”.

    This is very low with this vaccination for two reasons: The prevalence of the infection is very low, namely around three percent in the control group of the Israeli field study. In Germany, for example, the prevalence of the infection was never higher than eight percent, even at the peak of the wave of infections. The technical term prevalence stands for the rate of people suffering from a certain disease at a certain point in time or in a certain period of time (in relation to the number of those examined).

    The “infection fatality rate”, i.e. the number of people who are infected and die of the disease, is also low at around 0,5 percent. “These two facts taken together mean that the absolute effectiveness of the vaccination is very low, so that you have to vaccinate many people in order to be able to see a real benefit,” emphasized Rainer Klement, who carried out the comparative calculations.

    Since the vaccinations are associated with side effects, a relatively large number of people who have been vaccinated will also suffer such side effects, and the ratio increases compared to the advantages. From the Israeli field study, in which more than half a million people in the control group remained unvaccinated for six weeks, Klement deduced: “You have to vaccinate between 9000 and 50 000 people to prevent death. A good estimate is around 16 000 people. If you extrapolate that to 100 000 vaccinations, we will prevent around six deaths.”

    To compare this with the side effects of the Dutch data, analyst Wouter Aukema examined the side effect database of EMA. “The European countries report very differently,” says Aukema. “The European average is 127 side effects per 100 000 vaccinations. Holland leads the way with 701 cases per 100 000 vaccinations, Poland is last with 15 side effects per 100 000 vaccinations. Germany reports only 38 cases, or 30 percent of the EU average.”

    Based on the Dutch data as an approximation for this, according to the trio of authors, the ratio of deaths that can be expected in connection with the vaccination and that can be prevented by the vaccination is around 2:3. In other words: in order to prevent three deaths, one will have to accept two deaths as a result of the side effects. There are also 700 side effects, 16 of them severe.

    If the data from the approval studies is added, which show slightly better clinical effectiveness, then the ratio is at best 1:8, i.e. one death related to the vaccination and eight prevented deaths due to the vaccination.

    “These numbers can of course change,” says Wallach. “They depend on the sensitivity of the vaccinated groups. Because first the old and sick were vaccinated. One can hope that the relationship will improve if one observes for a longer period of time.”

    It is also unclear whether the data from a field study of the BioNTech vaccine is applicable to the other vaccines. This is because the AstraZeneca vaccine was not included in this analysis because there was no corresponding data on it.

    “At the national level, groups of independent scientists should investigate these side effect reports carefully,” according to Walach. “Because the data from the registers is unsystematic. They can represent an overestimation, but they are more likely an underestimation. Because we know from other studies that up to 95 percent of the side effects are not recorded in these registers.”

    According to Walach, it is difficult to say whether the results of this study are reliable. “We used the best data available at the moment. But they are actually not good enough. However, the fact that a similar study in the US comes to an estimate of 3,4 deaths for every 100 000 vaccinations – a number that is very close to the number we found of 4,11 – shows that our estimate is probably closer in reality.”

    “In any case, we shouldn’t start vaccination campaigns on children,” warned both Wallach and Klement. “Because the risk that a child becomes seriously ill with Covid-19 is very low – less than that of being killed in a traffic accident. Given these risks, vaccinating children is irresponsible.”

    Consider donating to support our work

    Help us to produce more articles like this. FreeWestMedia is depending on donations from our readers to keep going. With your help, we expose the mainstream fake news agenda.

    Keep ​your language polite​. Readers from many different countries visit and contribute to Free West Media and we must therefore obey the rules in​,​ for example​, ​Germany. Illegal content will be deleted.

    If you have been approved to post comments without preview from FWM, you are responsible for violation​s​ of​ any​ law. This means that FWM may be forced to cooperate with authorities in a possible crime investigation.

    If your comments are subject to preview ​by FWM, please be patient. We continually review comments but depending on the time of day it can take up to several hours before your comment is reviewed.

    We reserve the right to del​ete​ comments that are offensive, contain slander or foul language, or are irrelevant to the discussion.

    Europe
    Cardinal Anders Arborelius, Bishop of Stockholm, is one of the Catholic bishops who signed the letter, which was read out in churches throughout Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland over the Easter weekend. Photo: The Catholic Church

    Care prompts bishops to criticize transgender ideology

    The Catholic bishops of the Scandinavian countries presented an open five-page letter criticizing transgender ideology on March 21, just before Easter. The document primarily expresses care and advice and was read aloud in Catholic churches in Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland. Cardinal Anders Arborelius, Bishop of Stockholm, is one of the signatories of the document.

    FREEZING IN THEIR HOMES is the new grim reality for many Brits and Northern Europeans. Margaret is 92 years old and has just come in from the winter cold, but no warmth awaits her at home. She fears her own home more than the icy streets. Next to her are four thick blankets, and on the shelf above the fireplace, which she can no longer afford to buy wood for, is a meter showing the daily cost of electricity (inset). It shows £1.03, about 13 SEK. When it reaches £3, about 38 SEK, she is forced to turn off the little heat she has to afford it. Still image: ITW News

    Brits Forced to Live in Darkness and Cold

    Food prices are rising at a furious pace, fastest in Scotland in almost half a century. At the same time, energy prices are at record highs. People are forced to choose between freezing or going hungry, and a majority of Scots are forced to live in cold and darkness to cope with bills. Old generations' tricks for saving and keeping warm are returning. Nevertheless, it is feared that 10,000 Brits will die of cold homes this winter. We present the Swedish Public Health Agency's guidelines on indoor temperature. Governments in Europe are introducing rationing and monitoring of food purchases. Net-zero emissions are a lie that, in practice, de-industrializes the West and dramatically lowers our standard of living.

    Thousands of Flemish farmers block roads in Brussels against nitrogen policy

    BrusselsMore than 2500 farmers from Belgium's Dutch-speaking Flanders region gathered at Brussels' central Arts-Loi street and blocked roads with tractors toward Brussels to protest the regional government's plan to limit nitrogen emissions.

    Orban: EU energy sanctions costing citizens billions

    BudapestHungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has warned that some western states could soon send troops to Ukraine. He also criticized the fact that the EU sanctions against Russia had cost Hungarian taxpayers tens of billions of euros.

    Italy: New leader of the Social Democrats is one of Soros’ ‘preferred politicians’

    RomeDuring the election campaign, Elly Schlein presented herself as the standard-bearer of the poorest. However, her background and previous work raise doubts about her honesty.

    UK greenhouses shut down due to high energy costs

    LondonIn Great Britain, a particularly depressing facet of the crisis is now showing its first contours - and thus anticipating what is likely to happen in other European countries in the near future: because of the exploding energy prices, agriculture is being strangled and fresh produce has to be rationed.

    Lisbon opens borders to all Portuguese speakers

    LisbonNot only the German and Italian governments keep opening new paths for immigration. Portugal, too, has opened a Pandora's box and is paving the way for possibly millions of non-European immigrants to the EU – something which is not mentioned by the mainstream media.

    Illegal immigration to Italy has reached its highest level ever

    RomeIn Italy, despite the overwhelming right-wing electoral success in September, there is still nothing to be seen of the promised asylum turnaround – on the contrary. Giorgia Meloni has been in office for five months, but the arrivals of migrants in Italy have doubled compared to the previous year.

    Dismantling diplomacy with ‘feminist foreign policy’

    BudapestGerman Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock (Greens) wants to counter German security issues abroad with feminist politics. Gender training, LGBTQ events and quotas are now part of their new guidelines, which are intended to bring about "cultural change". The German ambassador to Hungary, Julia Gross, provided an embarrassing example.

    Germans demand investigation of Nord Stream sabotage

    BerlinAfter the sensational revelations by US investigative reporter Seymour Hersh about the perpetrators of the Nord Stream attacks on September 26, 2022, the German government has remained silent. It does not want to comment on Hersh's research results, according to which the pipelines were blown up by Americans and Norwegians.

    Go to archive