A gene vaccine with nanoparticles? Many are starting to have doubts

The conditional approval is valid for one year and allows vaccinations to be started before the full clinical trial is complete. The new vaccine contains the genetic information for a protein that sits on the surface of Sars-CoV-2 and docks with the host cells of the vaccinated person.

This genetic information serves as a blueprint with which the cells of the vaccinated are supposed to produce the virus protein, a product of a foreign organism. The immune system is then supposed to recognize the foreign proteins produced by the body as “not endogenous” and to form antibodies and memory T-cells that destroy these proteins and immunize them against “Corona”.

For this to work, the mRNA contained in the vaccine has to be packed into lipid nanoparticles. After the vaccine is administered, the lipid envelope fuses with the cell membrane and releases the mRNA.

Mass genetic experiment with uncertain outcome

The intended “vaccination” of the population is nothing more than a mass gene test, “spiced” with nanoparticles, the effects of which on the organism have not yet been conclusively clarified.

In the clinical tests carried out so far with the novel vaccine, the 43 538 test subjects did not experience any serious side effects, the mainstream media announced a few days ago.

Yesterday, however, the German ÄrzteZeitung reported that several people vaccinated in Great Britain had an allergic reaction to the vaccine. Such a reaction can go as far as anaphylactic shock, which is life-threatening.

In addition, some side effects are often only discovered after a long time. In Sweden, after vaccination against swine flu in 2009/2010 with the vaccine Pandemrix, which the Swedish government had called for, at least 475 patients developed the incurable sleeping sickness narcolepsy. There were also 81 suspected cases in Germany. The connection with the vaccination was not established until years later.

There are doctors who fear that mRNA vaccines could trigger autoimmune processes, and the rate of certain types of cancer may also increase.

Swissmedic has so far refused authorization

“We are not yet able to grant approval,” Claus Bolte, Head of Approval at the Swiss Medicines Agency, Swissmedic , told the federal media on December 1, regarding the vaccines against the Coronavirus. Rapid access is important, but not at the expense of care. The present interim results from the various manufacturers would not yet allow a benefit-risk decision, Bolte said. There was still a lack of data on safety, effectiveness and quality.

The Swiss Medicines Agency is of course independent from the European Union. It is strange that the Swiss have so far classified the data situation as insufficient for approval of the vaccine, while the vaccinations in the EU will start shortly.

German toxicologist warns about the vaccine

The statements by Professor Stefan Hockertz about the Corona vaccine at the 30th meeting of the so-called Corona Committee are also very informative. From 2003 to the end of 2004, Hockertz was director and professor of the Institute for Experimental and Clinical Toxicology at the University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf. His statements to the Corona Committee are summarized in the statement: “We are doing human experiments without knowing about the safety of the product.”

For anyone considering getting vaccinated, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also has a message: Don’t do it!

The nephew of former president John F. Kennedy recently issued a public statement urging people everywhere to avoid the new jab at all costs because it contains an untested new technology known as mRNA, the long-term side effects of which are completely unknown.

“This intervention can be compared to genetically modified foods, which are also very controversial,” Kennedy said. Unlike all other vaccines, the genetic damage of which is not necessarily permanent, mRNA genetic damage is “irreversible and irreparable,” Kennedy highlighted.

“Even though the media and politicians are currently trivializing the problem and even foolishly calling for a new type of vaccine to return to normality, this vaccination is problematic in terms of health, morality and ethics, but also in terms of genetic damage,” according to Kennedy.

“You will have to live with the consequences because you will no longer be able to be cured simply by removing toxins from the human body,” Kennedy explained. He compared the genetic damage to the type that causes Down syndrome or cystic fibrosis.

“This clearly means: if a vaccination symptom develops after an mRNA vaccination, neither I nor any other therapist will be able to help you, as the damage caused by this vaccination will be genetically irreversible,” Kennedy warned.

He said they represented a “crime against humanity that has never been committed in such a significant way in history”.

Other public figures denounce the mass experiment on humans

Experienced physician Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg noted that the vaccine should be banned because it was essentially “genetic engineering”.

The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)  – $21 billion nonprofit organization – also will not require its health care employees to take the Corona vaccine, according to PennLive.

UPMC’s medical director of infection prevention and epidemiology, Dr. Graham Snyder, said even though the 89 000 people employed are subject to a mandatory flu vaccination, it is “based on decades of experience with the influenza vaccine”.

“Until we learn more and build our own experience with this vaccine, plus, until we see the uptake of vaccine in our communities, and have an understanding about the role that vaccination has in ending this pandemic, it’s not the right thing to make it mandatory,” Snyder said.

Dr. Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Act, said forcing the untested mRNA vaccine on the public violated the Nuremberg ruling against medical experimentation on humans.